• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

cleveland parts

  • Thread starter Thread starter mercurycapri
  • Start date Start date Jun 30, 2007
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • …
  • 6
Next
1 of 6 Next Last
M

mercurycapri

Member
May 30, 2006
211
2
18
washington
Jun 30, 2007
#1
  • Jun 30, 2007
  • #1
I have a 302 Windsor and Im wanting to put on some cleveland 2V or modified heads on my 302. Is there a web site that has pistons and related parts for what I would need for this conversion?
 
M

mikethebike

Member
Jun 12, 2007
358
0
17
Greenville, SC
Jun 30, 2007
#2
  • Jun 30, 2007
  • #2
I'm a big believer in Cleveland motors. What you want to do is just not worth the trouble. I would just go with a 351'C' motor and be done with it. But it is your car.
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Jun 30, 2007
#3
  • Jun 30, 2007
  • #3
mercurycapri said:
I have a 302 Windsor and Im wanting to put on some cleveland 2V or modified heads on my 302. Is there a web site that has pistons and related parts for what I would need for this conversion?
Click to expand...

Here's what you'd need: Boss 302 pistons (cleveland valve layout with a 1.55 pin height), Boss 302 rods to use with the 1.55 pin height pistons ( 5.155" long) Cleveland heads with quench chambers ( to keep the compression up where it needs to be) choice here is 70-71 4 bbl heads or a set of the later "Aussie" 2 bbl heads (these come up on ebay all the time)When you get these heads, they'll need modification to alter the coolant path to route it out thru the intake rather than back into the block (intake face drilled at the end and block port beneath this plugged) Lastly you'll need either an orginal Boss 302 intake or a "Street Boss" or "Track Boss" intake made by a company in Ft. Smith Ar. twenty years back (ebay item too) I don't recall the mfg. name offhand for this one. When you finnaly get it together, you'll have an engine more easily made using aftermarket Windsor style heads at half the price. In short, you will have to REALLY will want this style engine to do it for the time and effort and money it'll cost.
 

rbohm

Founding Member
Apr 12, 2002
6,698
550
204
tucson,az
Jun 30, 2007
#4
  • Jun 30, 2007
  • #4
D.Hearne said:
Here's what you'd need: Boss 302 pistons (cleveland valve layout with a 1.55 pin height), Boss 302 rods to use with the 1.55 pin height pistons ( 5.155" long) Cleveland heads with quench chambers ( to keep the compression up where it needs to be) choice here is 70-71 4 bbl heads or a set of the later "Aussie" 2 bbl heads (these come up on ebay all the time)When you get these heads, they'll need modification to alter the coolant path to route it out thru the intake rather than back into the block (intake face drilled at the end and block port beneath this plugged) Lastly you'll need either an orginal Boss 302 intake or a "Street Boss" or "Track Boss" intake made by a company in Ft. Smith Ar. twenty years back (ebay item too) I don't recall the mfg. name offhand for this one. When you finnaly get it together, you'll have an engine more easily made using aftermarket Windsor style heads at half the price. In short, you will have to REALLY will want this style engine to do it for the time and effort and money it'll cost.
Click to expand...

the company that made the intakes was B&A perofrmance, and then later bush performance. price motorsports has intake adaptors to use a windsor intake with cleveland heads. one thing you forgot D. was the headers. they are going to be expensive for the fox body.
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Jun 30, 2007
#5
  • Jun 30, 2007
  • #5
rbohm said:
the company that made the intakes was B&A perofrmance, and then later bush performance. price motorsports has intake adaptors to use a windsor intake with cleveland heads. one thing you forgot D. was the headers. they are going to have to be custom built for a capri.
Click to expand...

Right you are I figured I was likely leaving something out I wonder if Cleveland headers would fill in here? Only an inch difference in deck height. 302 headers often work on 351W's in this case but not often the otherway around due to the starter boss clearance. Went thru that in modding a 351W swap header (for a 65-66 Stang) for my 89 Ranger's 302.
 
B

bnickel

Founding Member
Aug 21, 2002
5,640
3
77
lubbock, texas
Jun 30, 2007
#6
  • Jun 30, 2007
  • #6
i've been told that Bush performance is still around and still makes the intakes do a search on the net and you should be able to find contact info. also original boss intakes are bringing super big money about $400 or so, so they aren't hugely expensive. D.Hearne is correct that you need the 5.155" rods but you don't need original boss 302 pieces, the 289 uses the same rods and in fact the boss 302 rods were just updated hi-po 289 castings with bigger rod bolts for the most part. there are also several aftermarket companies that make a 5.155 rod like Eagle, etc. and TRW still makes the boss 302 piston, or at least they did last time i checked anyway. you also have the option of using aftermarket aluminum cleveland heads these days, CHI, E'brock, Blue Thunder and MPG head services all have them. and lastly, i've heard that E'brock is going to start making an intake especially for the "clevor" style engines either this year or early next year. headers will still be a pain to find but i think you can use early mustang headers in a fox body just not the other way around, though you may have to some modifications, not sure what if any though.
 
M

mercurycapri

Member
May 30, 2006
211
2
18
washington
Jun 30, 2007
#7
  • Jun 30, 2007
  • #7
thank you guys you all helped me out allot again thanks
 
M

mikethebike

Member
Jun 12, 2007
358
0
17
Greenville, SC
Jun 30, 2007
#8
  • Jun 30, 2007
  • #8
D.Hearne said:
Here's what you'd need: Boss 302 pistons (cleveland valve layout with a 1.55 pin height), Boss 302 rods to use with the 1.55 pin height pistons ( 5.155" long) Cleveland heads with quench chambers ( to keep the compression up where it needs to be) choice here is 70-71 4 bbl heads or a set of the later "Aussie" 2 bbl heads (these come up on ebay all the time)When you get these heads, they'll need modification to alter the coolant path to route it out thru the intake rather than back into the block (intake face drilled at the end and block port beneath this plugged) Lastly you'll need either an orginal Boss 302 intake or a "Street Boss" or "Track Boss" intake made by a company in Ft. Smith Ar. twenty years back (ebay item too) I don't recall the mfg. name offhand for this one. When you finnaly get it together, you'll have an engine more easily made using aftermarket Windsor style heads at half the price. In short, you will have to REALLY will want this style engine to do it for the time and effort and money it'll cost.
Click to expand...

From what I remember about MY BOSS 302 the pistons would not interchange with a Cleveland motor because the BOSS was a pent-roof and the 'c' was not. But if he needs some BOSS 302 rods.....I have a set. They are not cheap. I may put them in my 289.
Everything else I'm in 100% agreement with. Just get a 351c.
 
M

mikethebike

Member
Jun 12, 2007
358
0
17
Greenville, SC
Jun 30, 2007
#9
  • Jun 30, 2007
  • #9
bnickel said:
i've been told that Bush performance is still around and still makes the intakes do a search on the net and you should be able to find contact info. also original boss intakes are bringing super big money about $400 or so, so they aren't hugely expensive. D.Hearne is correct that you need the 5.155" rods but you don't need original boss 302 pieces, the 289 uses the same rods and in fact the boss 302 rods were just updated hi-po 289 castings with bigger rod bolts for the most part. there are also several aftermarket companies that make a 5.155 rod like Eagle, etc. and TRW still makes the boss 302 piston, or at least they did last time i checked anyway. you also have the option of using aftermarket aluminum cleveland heads these days, CHI, E'brock, Blue Thunder and MPG head services all have them. and lastly, i've heard that E'brock is going to start making an intake especially for the "clevor" style engines either this year or early next year. headers will still be a pain to find but i think you can use early mustang headers in a fox body just not the other way around, though you may have to some modifications, not sure what if any though.
Click to expand...

The rods were forged.
 

rbohm

Founding Member
Apr 12, 2002
6,698
550
204
tucson,az
Jun 30, 2007
#10
  • Jun 30, 2007
  • #10
mikethebike said:
From what I remember about MY BOSS 302 the pistons would not interchange with a Cleveland motor because the BOSS was a pent-roof and the 'c' was not. But if he needs some BOSS 302 rods.....I have a set. They are not cheap. I may put them in my 289.
Everything else I'm in 100% agreement with. Just get a 351c.
Click to expand...

the only difference between the boss 302 piston and the 351c piston is the pin height. remember that the boss 302 used a slightly modified form of the 351c 4v head.
 
B

bnickel

Founding Member
Aug 21, 2002
5,640
3
77
lubbock, texas
Jun 30, 2007
#11
  • Jun 30, 2007
  • #11
mikethebike said:
The rods were forged.
Click to expand...


all Ford v8 connecting rods are forged, unless they are the newer powdered metal type as used in the 4.6 and 5.4.
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Jul 1, 2007
#12
  • Jul 1, 2007
  • #12
mikethebike said:
From what I remember about MY BOSS 302 the pistons would not interchange with a Cleveland motor because the BOSS was a pent-roof and the 'c' was not.
Click to expand...

 

ratio411

Founding Member
Apr 21, 2002
3,870
73
109
Pensacola FL
Jul 1, 2007
#13
  • Jul 1, 2007
  • #13
mikethebike said:
From what I remember about MY BOSS 302 the pistons would not interchange with a Cleveland motor because the BOSS was a pent-roof and the 'c' was not.
Click to expand...

Neither the C or B had pentroof chambers.

The Boss used slightly modded Cleveland heads.
Much will interchange, or at least was built on the same foundation.

Think of the Boss as a hybrid between 289/302 and 351c.
That's all it was...
 

Hack

15 Year Member
Mar 23, 2004
1,945
13
69
Minneapolis
Jul 1, 2007
#14
  • Jul 1, 2007
  • #14
CHI also makes intakes for your combo. If $s aren't the main consideration, I would say that CHI heads and intake are really good pieces that you should consider. CHI also has the coolant bypass you will need.

You can get reworked Aussie 302C heads from Powerheads, but they put the big 4V valves in, which seems a little big to me.

Also, you will need a relief cut in the top of the cylinders to clear the intake valves. At least you need it with 4Vs, you may also need it with 2Vs. Make sure you mock this stuff up or go with a good machine shop.

Mark McKeown is a good source for custom cams. He really knows the Cleveland engine.

Edit: this would require custom pistons, but I wouldn't put Cleveland 4V heads in a 302 displacement engine. I think you should do a stroker if you want 4V heads. The 4V heads really flow a LOT, even a lot for a 351 cube engine. They are well suited for a 408 ci motor.
 
M

mikethebike

Member
Jun 12, 2007
358
0
17
Greenville, SC
Jul 1, 2007
#15
  • Jul 1, 2007
  • #15
rbohm said:
the only difference between the boss 302 piston and the 351c piston is the pin height. remember that the boss 302 used a slightly modified form of the 351c 4v head.
Click to expand...
I remember the BOSS 302 came before the 351'c'. 1969/1970. And do you have a side by side picture with casting numbers visible of a BOSS-302 and 4 barrell 'c' head to show your point?
 
M

mikethebike

Member
Jun 12, 2007
358
0
17
Greenville, SC
Jul 1, 2007
#16
  • Jul 1, 2007
  • #16
ratio411 said:
Neither the C or B had pentroof chambers.

The Boss used slightly modded Cleveland heads.
Much will interchange, or at least was built on the same foundation.

Think of the Boss as a hybrid between 289/302 and 351c.
That's all it was...
Click to expand...

Well, I broke 7 pistons one night in 74 racing a 750 trident triumph and when we took the engine down they sure looked more pent-roof than wedge. But it ws just MY BOSS 302, not yours...maybe YOURS was different.
 

ratio411

Founding Member
Apr 21, 2002
3,870
73
109
Pensacola FL
Jul 1, 2007
#17
  • Jul 1, 2007
  • #17
mikethebike said:
I remember the BOSS 302 came before the 351'c'. 1969/1970. And do you have a side by side picture with casting numbers visible of a BOSS-302 and 4 barrell 'c' head to show your point?
Click to expand...

Okay son, here we go...
I am a veteran of this arguement!

The Cleveland began development around 67-68.
During that time, there was an unrelated engeering development going on that would become the Boss 302. At the time, it was dubbed "tunnelport 302". This engine was in the works for limited production homologation for the TransAm racing circuit.
Around 68, the TP302 was determined to be a big useless dud of an engine.
They found that the engineers on that project relied way too much on outdated FE TP427 technology and just tried to adapt it directy to a 302.
This project was now set several years back, however Ford was chomping at the bit to win some TA races.
When they realized their heads were going to roll if they didn't do something fast, they looked over at the Cleveland engineers, with their 4v heads. The first thing that was obvious was that the heads used the same bolt pattern and bore spacing as a 302.
The Cleveland development saved their a$$es and the TP302, now dubbed "Boss" won some TA races.

That is how the B302 came out with Cleveland heads one year before the official release of the Cleveland.

I can't stand folks that push 'owning' a Boss in your face to make you think they are experts on the subject.
I have never owned one and I know more about them than you do.

Open your mouth on the subject again if you want to keep going.
I got pics and all. It just ain't worth my PC time to produce them all for you when you can just open your mouth and show how much you don't know.

Btw:
Casting numbers will be different.
Anyone would realize that... the water passages are moved slightly to send the water through the intake of a Boss. Therefore the casting will be different.
Put the two heads side by side from any angle, the biggest difference is the water passage. Everything else is cast the same. A child could determine that without having to match numbers.
 

ratio411

Founding Member
Apr 21, 2002
3,870
73
109
Pensacola FL
Jul 1, 2007
#18
  • Jul 1, 2007
  • #18
For giggles, here is the original "Boss 302" head -circa 68-, before they called it Boss, of course.



Edit:
Riddle me this...
Which intake flange is the B302?
Which is the Cleveland?
Top or bottom...
 

Attachments

  • 302-351c intake flanges.webp
    6.4 KB · Views: 260

rbohm

Founding Member
Apr 12, 2002
6,698
550
204
tucson,az
Jul 1, 2007
#19
  • Jul 1, 2007
  • #19
ratio411 said:
For giggles, here is the original "Boss 302" head -circa 68-, before they called it Boss, of course.



Edit:
Riddle me this...
Which intake flange is the B302?
Which is the Cleveland?
Top or bottom...
Click to expand...

(raises hand immediately) OH OH I KNOW I KNOW the bottom one the the boss 302 intake. you can tell because it has the coolant passage.







or should i have let mike answer that one?
 

fasttback

New Member
Apr 16, 2005
471
0
0
Northern CA
Jul 1, 2007
#20
  • Jul 1, 2007
  • #20
D.Hearne said:
Here's what you'd need: Boss 302 pistons (cleveland valve layout with a 1.55 pin height), Boss 302 rods to use with the 1.55 pin height pistons ( 5.155" long) Cleveland heads with quench chambers ( to keep the compression up where it needs to be) choice here is 70-71 4 bbl heads or a set of the later "Aussie" 2 bbl heads (these come up on ebay all the time)When you get these heads, they'll need modification to alter the coolant path to route it out thru the intake rather than back into the block (intake face drilled at the end and block port beneath this plugged) Lastly you'll need either an orginal Boss 302 intake or a "Street Boss" or "Track Boss" intake made by a company in Ft. Smith Ar. twenty years back (ebay item too) I don't recall the mfg. name offhand for this one. When you finnaly get it together, you'll have an engine more easily made using aftermarket Windsor style heads at half the price. In short, you will have to REALLY will want this style engine to do it for the time and effort and money it'll cost.
Click to expand...


I wanted one of these motors back in the 1980's, but opted for the 351W heads on a 302. I still have the 80's advertisement for the track boss manifold. Nice combo 20 years ago, but as D.Hearne mentioned it's not worth the effort today because of the aftermarket products for the Windsor motors. If you want something a little different go for it.
 
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • …
  • 6
Next
1 of 6 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

P
67 Mustang, with the 302 want to convert auto back to the original manual
  • Pdunn
  • May 3, 2026
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Replies
2
Views
125
Classic Mustang Specific Tech May 7, 2026
Mcmahst
T
New Guy from Southeast Missouri
  • tcooke11
  • Jan 10, 2026
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
1
Views
263
The Welcome Wagon Jan 17, 2026
TomcatPC
S
Best place to source power steering parts for a '67? (control valve, ram, hoses)
  • SophiaTatum
  • Jun 15, 2026
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Replies
2
Views
73
Classic Mustang Specific Tech Jun 18, 2026
SophiaTatum
S
For Sale Ford 331 stroker engine for sale - with options!
  • TTSaleen
  • Jul 1, 2026
  • Engine and Power Adder
Replies
6
Views
218
Engine and Power Adder Jul 2, 2026
Noobz347
M
Please help me identify this.
  • MattyB77
  • Jul 2, 2026
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
3
Views
108
The Welcome Wagon Jul 4, 2026
gkomo
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?