• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

Cobra gt-40 / explorer manifold...

  • Thread starter Thread starter Adam95GT
  • Start date Start date Oct 4, 2006
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

Adam95GT

New Member
Aug 14, 2006
2,564
3
0
Burlington, NJ
Oct 4, 2006
#1
  • Oct 4, 2006
  • #1
Just wondering expirences with the explorer manifolds... which ones are we able to use... how much gains... what year explorer ect... erg... all that good stufff.... lol
thanks,
adam
 

OrangeMustangGt

Founding Member
Mar 7, 2002
1,976
0
36
Cape Cod, MA
Oct 4, 2006
#2
  • Oct 4, 2006
  • #2
dont use the lower.
its better than stock but not much...

the upper is great
 

JJ95GTID

Active Member
Sep 22, 2003
1,141
4
49
Phoenix, AZ
Oct 4, 2006
#3
  • Oct 4, 2006
  • #3
The Explorer intake made my car go from 14.469sec to 14.103sec in the 1/4mile. It really pulls hard all the way to 6K rpm where the stocker fell on its face right at 5k rpm.

I am sure you can use any of the 5.0L Explorer intakes since the 94-95 Mustangs use an external EGR setup. Mine is from one of the later years ,98-01 I think, and has no internal EGR tube molded into the upper intake.
 

blksn955.o

Founding Member
Mar 15, 2002
3,263
0
66
st.louis mo 314
Oct 4, 2006
#4
  • Oct 4, 2006
  • #4
I dunno if you got a bad lemmon lower or what green but the lowers are about the exact same as any other gt40 lower (the EGR or non-EGR is the biggie). My lower was no were near what the stocker was...and the stock gt40 lower was about the same port opening as my ported gt lower.

Either internal or non-internal explorer gt40 will work. If its a v8 exploder then it has the gt40 sytle intake, its just if its internal EGR or non-internal EGR.

I have a non-EGR intake...I kinda wish it was an internal EGR one so I could to a fox t-body swap for cleaner looks. However, its not really that big of an issue.
 

Adam95GT

New Member
Aug 14, 2006
2,564
3
0
Burlington, NJ
Oct 4, 2006
#5
  • Oct 4, 2006
  • #5
so what can i just slap on EGR or no EGR
 

JJ95GTID

Active Member
Sep 22, 2003
1,141
4
49
Phoenix, AZ
Oct 4, 2006
#6
  • Oct 4, 2006
  • #6
Adam95GT said:
so what can i just slap on EGR or no EGR
Click to expand...

Either one will work fine with your car.

I guess the EGR version is slightly more desirable IF you plan to sell it in the future Or plan to convert to a Fox style throttle body and want to keep the EGR functioning. Otherwise get either version.

Also, you will need an elbow adapter to attach the throttle body in the stock location.
 

JJ95GTID

Active Member
Sep 22, 2003
1,141
4
49
Phoenix, AZ
Oct 4, 2006
#7
  • Oct 4, 2006
  • #7
Here is mine.
 

blksn955.o

Founding Member
Mar 15, 2002
3,263
0
66
st.louis mo 314
Oct 4, 2006
#8
  • Oct 4, 2006
  • #8
yep either will work...pics

here is mine I cleaned up and had powdercoated silver metalic. It was dark in the garage when I took the pics.





 

Adam95GT

New Member
Aug 14, 2006
2,564
3
0
Burlington, NJ
Oct 4, 2006
#9
  • Oct 4, 2006
  • #9
Looks good thanks for the info guys... SOOOOO the non EGR intake manifold will work on our cars and the EGR will still be functional because its external? im leaving the 95 tb set up probally... i just wanna hit 13's and this looks like almost more bang for the $ over headers + h Pipe...


So i figure.... 3.73's, CAI, explorer manifold, Headers, H pipe, Clutch, and some driving skills might get me there... at least low 14's untill summer when i have $ for heads n cam
 

Dagz

New Member
Dec 2, 2005
173
0
0
Quesnel Canada
Oct 5, 2006
#10
  • Oct 5, 2006
  • #10
Hey blksn955.0 just wondering exactly what year that upper came off of, can you use the stock lower intake, are you running your egr and if so how, and are you running you stock throttle body and throttle cable?

Sorry for asking the questions again just want to clairify.

Thanks

Dagz
 

blksn955.o

Founding Member
Mar 15, 2002
3,263
0
66
st.louis mo 314
Oct 5, 2006
#11
  • Oct 5, 2006
  • #11
I bought it off someone else so I dont know the exact year. It is a non-internal EGR.

I run an elbow to keep the stock external EGR setup and stock T-body (for now will be going polished 70mm). WIth the elbow you just bolt on everything that was stock back up.

You cannot just use the upper on a stock lower, the ports are WAY different. You can use any gt40 upper though.
 
S

Synned

took tubgirl on a date and got banned
Mar 31, 2005
991
1
0
Philly
Oct 5, 2006
#12
  • Oct 5, 2006
  • #12
When you guys say non-EGR, its still internal EGR right?
How does an internal EGR setup work?
Would you just plug your header opening?
If the intake really doesn't have egr isn't the car going to run crappy?
 
V

Voice of Reason

New Member
Jun 25, 2003
70
0
0
Spring, TX
Oct 5, 2006
#13
  • Oct 5, 2006
  • #13
Any clearance problems with the stock hood and STB? I'm not familiar with the size differences between the stock and other intakes. And what's a good price for one of these? Are most of you finding them for sale in classifieds or are you finding them in junkyards?
 

JJ95GTID

Active Member
Sep 22, 2003
1,141
4
49
Phoenix, AZ
Oct 5, 2006
#14
  • Oct 5, 2006
  • #14
Synned said:
When you guys say non-EGR, its still internal EGR right?
How does an internal EGR setup work?
Would you just plug your header opening?
If the intake really doesn't have egr isn't the car going to run crappy?
Click to expand...

1. We didn't say non-EGR. We said external and internal EGR.
2. 87-93 Fox Mustangs use an internal EGR setup. This means that molded into the upper intake is a tube that the exhaust gas fumes go through. Explorers and 94-95 Mustangs utilize an external EGR setup. Instead of a tube molded into the upper intake the exhaust gas goes directly into the air path behind the throttle body in the "elbow" of the upper intake.
3. You can remove the EGR system and that would mean you would have to plug the hole in the passanger side header and fooling or tuning the EEC-IV so you don't get a check engine light.
4. If the intake really doesn't have an EGR then the car will not run like crap. Many people here run without the EGR hooked up.
 

JJ95GTID

Active Member
Sep 22, 2003
1,141
4
49
Phoenix, AZ
Oct 5, 2006
#15
  • Oct 5, 2006
  • #15
Voice of Reason said:
Any clearance problems with the stock hood and STB? I'm not familiar with the size differences between the stock and other intakes. And what's a good price for one of these? Are most of you finding them for sale in classifieds or are you finding them in junkyards?
Click to expand...

1. The stock hood does fit without problems. My hood blanket in getting a hole from one of the bolt heads but this is no big deal. The stock STB will not work. I just took my STB off as seen in the picture above.
2. For both upper and lower intakes between $100-$250 is about right.
3. Got mine off ebay. You can check local junkyards. Just ask for any Explorer running a 5.0L engine. 96-01 Explorers I think is the range of years they ran the 5.0L.
 

Adam95GT

New Member
Aug 14, 2006
2,564
3
0
Burlington, NJ
Oct 5, 2006
#16
  • Oct 5, 2006
  • #16
how can you tell weither or not its internal or external... Whats easiest to use and keep stock EGR set up im in NJ and need it for emissions... does the 97-98 esplorers have internal or external egr... if the manifold i buy has internal egr can you block the port and continue to use extrenal egr...
 

Dagz

New Member
Dec 2, 2005
173
0
0
Quesnel Canada
Oct 5, 2006
#17
  • Oct 5, 2006
  • #17
sorry comp screwed up didn't get the other posts.
 

JJ95GTID

Active Member
Sep 22, 2003
1,141
4
49
Phoenix, AZ
Oct 5, 2006
#18
  • Oct 5, 2006
  • #18
Adam95GT said:
how can you tell weither or not its internal or external... Whats easiest to use and keep stock EGR set up im in NJ and need it for emissions... does the 97-98 esplorers have internal or external egr... if the manifold i buy has internal egr can you block the port and continue to use extrenal egr...
Click to expand...


Doesn't matter which one you get. The elbow adapter that you have to get is where the EGR mounts to. The elbow adapter blocks the tube on all upper intakes that have the internal EGR tube. This includes all Ford and afterrmarket brand intakes. I passed emissions with no problems.
 

blksn955.o

Founding Member
Mar 15, 2002
3,263
0
66
st.louis mo 314
Oct 5, 2006
#19
  • Oct 5, 2006
  • #19
sorry, I think I may be to blame for the non-EGR confusion. I meant non-internal EGR.

The upper and lower both have EGR passages and the non-internal ones do not have the hole in the center of the lower intake that is the EGR passage.

Like said with the elbow you can run either internal or external, the elbow blocks off the internal passages on the uppers at the T-body mount location.

To tell quickly if its internal or not, on the face of the intake T-body opening you will see either a flat smooth surface with no "lines" or openings going around the t-body opening hole OR you will see these lines. Also the center hole in the lower.
 

blksn955.o

Founding Member
Mar 15, 2002
3,263
0
66
st.louis mo 314
Oct 5, 2006
#20
  • Oct 5, 2006
  • #20
Found this in the fox section...

http://www.allfordmustangs.com/Detailed/614.shtml

and were I got that link has ALOT of good info (remember its for fox people so some of the EGR stuff is diff.).

http://forums.stangnet.com/showthread.php?t=551505&highlight=intake+pics
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

1
Engine Motor swap from a 2003 Explorer
  • 1996mustang new
  • Oct 9, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
565
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Oct 16, 2025
squeak93
S
Fuel ‘88 GT Runs Rich Cold — Fixes Itself When I Unplug Sensors (ECT, MAF, O2, etc.)
  • Sufarry
  • Nov 6, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
12
Views
808
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Nov 9, 2025
Mustang5L5
Engine Felpro 9333 pt1 (with 8psi boost)
  • JD1964
  • Jan 14, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
18
Views
732
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Feb 1, 2026
Qtrhrse23
Q
C
03 Cobra Low Fuel Pressure
  • CTsnake_03
  • Mar 17, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
234
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Mar 24, 2026
CTsnake_03
C
T
What's it Worth? 2002 GT conv/auto
  • tonydetesta
  • Jan 7, 2026
  • What is it Worth?!?!?
Replies
3
Views
624
What is it Worth?!?!? Jan 21, 2026
Mustang5L5
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?