• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

coil over questions (need options)

  • Thread starter Thread starter hognutz
  • Start date Start date Jun 3, 2004

hognutz

New Member
Nov 12, 2002
1,940
0
0
albany, oregon
Jun 3, 2004
#1
  • Jun 3, 2004
  • #1
right now I have bilsteins with h&r springs. it is a bit harsh for my taste. I am thinking of switching to coilovers.

now what is the best combo. keep the bilsteins and run maximum motorsports kit? or should I look to other companies? should I consider ajustable shocks as well?
 

Aaron 4.6

Founding Member
Apr 10, 2001
2,695
0
0
Georgia
Jun 3, 2004
#2
  • Jun 3, 2004
  • #2
You can't beat the MM quality. Your need for adjustable shocks will depend on what you intend to do with the car. Street use with the occasional AutoX or OT event will not require adjustables. A track whore would probably benefit tremendously.

The people at MM should be able to set you up with a comfortable riding coilover combo.
 

hognutz

New Member
Nov 12, 2002
1,940
0
0
albany, oregon
Jun 3, 2004
#3
  • Jun 3, 2004
  • #3
yeah it is funny how much some of the coilover kits differ in price. I do like MM's reputation. I don't really want to ajust the suspention I am just paranoid of not being able to dial it in to my liking so to speak. in reality the right spring combo should put me where I need to be.
 

Qrazy02GT

Founding Member
Jun 10, 2002
319
0
0
Groton, CT
Jun 4, 2004
#4
  • Jun 4, 2004
  • #4
Take a look at Eibach....They JUST came out with an all adjustable coilover package for our stangs. Adjustable ride height is a nice benefit....
 

hognutz

New Member
Nov 12, 2002
1,940
0
0
albany, oregon
Jun 4, 2004
#5
  • Jun 4, 2004
  • #5
hmm I have not seen those yet. guess I will take a look.
 

hognutz

New Member
Nov 12, 2002
1,940
0
0
albany, oregon
Jun 6, 2004
#6
  • Jun 6, 2004
  • #6
anyone else haven any info on the eibach coilover kit. can't find much on the net. must be fairly new.
 

Trublu01

SPRAYMAN
Founding Member
Mar 11, 2001
6,673
0
0
Loxahatchee, FL
Jun 6, 2004
#7
  • Jun 6, 2004
  • #7
Coilovers offer a much rougher ride over a regular setup.
 

hognutz

New Member
Nov 12, 2002
1,940
0
0
albany, oregon
Jun 6, 2004
#8
  • Jun 6, 2004
  • #8
Trublu01 said:
Coilovers offer a much rougher ride over a regular setup.
Click to expand...

and what gives you that idea. coilovers have a spring rate just like anything else. the sping is located in more effecint position as well. a 200lb coilover spring is roughly equivelent to a 800lb normal spring. hence you get a less harsh ride.
 

Trublu01

SPRAYMAN
Founding Member
Mar 11, 2001
6,673
0
0
Loxahatchee, FL
Jun 6, 2004
#9
  • Jun 6, 2004
  • #9
What gives me that idea? I run QA1 coilovers with a 14" 175# spring (recommended) and I feel the difference and so do most others who have a similar setup and when you thow a set of skinnies on, you really notice it.
 

1fast03pony

Member
Jul 1, 2003
749
0
17
New york
Jun 6, 2004
#10
  • Jun 6, 2004
  • #10
Griggs racing makes nice coilover kits.. im running one right now, with a 350lb spring. not harsh at all.

my struts on the other hand.. used mach 1 pieces of ****ing ****... now theyre garbage. be sure to upgrade to decent struts.
 

Turbo92PGT

Member
Feb 17, 2003
746
0
16
Auburn Washington
Jun 6, 2004
#11
  • Jun 6, 2004
  • #11
I think I should've gone with some kind of coilover setup. I'm not really happy with the drop my sportlines gave me. I still have like 2-3 finger gap between tires and fender. Any car I've ridden in with coilovers is a bouncy jarring ride. A mustang may be different. I've never been in any car with lowering springs or c/o's and a performance shock. I know my car kinda sucks at handling with the stock shocks. The back end like jumps in the air when i go over a bump.
 

hognutz

New Member
Nov 12, 2002
1,940
0
0
albany, oregon
Jun 7, 2004
#12
  • Jun 7, 2004
  • #12
Trublu01 said:
What gives me that idea? I run QA1 coilovers with a 14" 175# spring (recommended) and I feel the difference and so do most others who have a similar setup and when you thow a set of skinnies on, you really notice it.
Click to expand...

I just wonder if you have it set up right. or you are lowered to far. I am not picking on you but maybe you need to play with you valving and spring rate. I guess I will put it this way I have riden in many stock cars with coilovers that were not bouncy. newer camaro's are coilover they don't ride bouncy. so the right shock, strut, springrate, ride height combo is going to give you a good ride that is hard to argue. now finding that combo may take some tweeking. I think that is why I have a problem now I just have to stiff a srpring with to much drop and stiff struts. I have heard from a few that MM coil over kit with bilstines was a way better ride than a convetional spring that is hearsay though. the physics of it make sence to me though. I guess I will find out and post results.

I am also considering the eibach kit because I bet that eibach engineered it to have a better ride quality that qa1 one did thier kit. that is just a guess though.
 

01GT eibach

Active Member
Nov 18, 2002
1,075
0
36
Pittsburgh, PA
Jun 7, 2004
#13
  • Jun 7, 2004
  • #13
If it is all about ride harshness, you may want to consider dumping the Bilsteins in favor of some Tokico Illuminas. That is what I did and ride quality when up dramatically ... although that is with Pro Kit springs, not H&R.
 

hognutz

New Member
Nov 12, 2002
1,940
0
0
albany, oregon
Jun 7, 2004
#14
  • Jun 7, 2004
  • #14
well I have thought about that. I am just a bit torn. I don't really want ajustable suspention I just want a good handling good riding suspention. stock road ok handled like crap. now it handles great but rides like crap. what setting do you have them on. I have read the premimus are like 2-3 setting on the illuminias. did run the fox body or regualr tockico's. I think it was white99gt or someone who said they broke two rear normal shocks and then switched to the fox body.
 

zgarske1038

Member
Dec 7, 2003
222
0
17
Hilton Head Island, South Carolina
Jun 7, 2004
#15
  • Jun 7, 2004
  • #15
harsh ride quality? suppose thats why they put coilovers in Lamborghini's and other supercars suppose their rides suck too
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

A definitive answer to the question of how much height Energy Suspension isolators add
  • 2000xp8
  • May 20, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
257
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 20, 2025
2000xp8
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
735
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
New to me 98 Cobra
  • bird_dog0347
  • Feb 25, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
26
Views
1K
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Mar 24, 2026
FastDriver
F
Coil Over Kit
  • Fri Guy
  • Aug 24, 2022
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
25
Views
3K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Aug 26, 2022
Mustang5L5
Tightening upper control arm bushings at ride height dilemma… need some help
  • AnthonyA1234
  • Dec 27, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
51
Views
5K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Feb 27, 2025
General karthief
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?