• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

Cold Air intake Q's waiting for A's

  • Thread starter Thread starter Kronos
  • Start date Start date Apr 25, 2008
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

Winters98GT

Whoop...whoop-whoop-whoop-whoop...GANGNAM STYLE!!!
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
5,520
1,291
224
H Town
Apr 27, 2008
#21
  • Apr 27, 2008
  • #21
we need to put down the magazines.
 

EPIK

Member
Jul 3, 2004
796
1
16
LEFT COAST
Apr 28, 2008
#22
  • Apr 28, 2008
  • #22
Winters98GT said:
we need to put down the magazines.
Click to expand...

??? Whats that supposed to mean???
 

Winters98GT

Whoop...whoop-whoop-whoop-whoop...GANGNAM STYLE!!!
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
5,520
1,291
224
H Town
Apr 28, 2008
#23
  • Apr 28, 2008
  • #23
its in reference to the hp claims in this thread, nothing personal.
 

98V6 K.I.T.T.

Founding Member
Mar 6, 2001
2,049
0
46
Everett, Washington
Apr 28, 2008
#24
  • Apr 28, 2008
  • #24
Well, either go with a JLT or K&N CAI. The CAI will help alittle bit more with a T/B and intake plenum. However....one thing that nobody says is that if you get the K&N or the JLT short ram intake when you go to the drag strip you can take off your passenger side headlight and it will act as a ram air system....helps alittle bit too. The fenderwell ones seem pointless to me.
 
J

Jbauer

New Member
Jan 20, 2008
506
0
0
Apr 28, 2008
#25
  • Apr 28, 2008
  • #25
Winters98GT said:
its in reference to the hp claims in this thread, nothing personal.
Click to expand...

I don't understang, my HP claims are not magazine..they're pretty realistic figures.
 

Winters98GT

Whoop...whoop-whoop-whoop-whoop...GANGNAM STYLE!!!
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
5,520
1,291
224
H Town
Apr 28, 2008
#26
  • Apr 28, 2008
  • #26
Jbauer said:
I don't understang, my HP claims are not magazine..they're pretty realistic figures.
Click to expand...

maybe to you they are, as for me, they are not.

Ive personally tested the bbk cold air kit in 2001(yes, fenderwell kit with a bend). We had a 800DA at Navasota Raceway, and swapped a stock airbox with kn to the bbk cold air kit, and it hurt perfomance. My best run came with the stock airbox and kn(9.18 in my sig) that night. I made 3 runs with each. 60fts all were in the 1.98-2.02 range. MPH did not increase. I dont feel that the newer kits offer much gain, if any over the stock elbow and airbox.

I tested a 70mmtb at CXI in 2001 on my ported PI headswap car. Gain? NADDA. .5hp I believe, nothing under the curve.

You might have your own experiences at the track and on the dyno swapping these parts. My experience is they do nothing.

The gain from a cold air kit and catback is going to come from the better flowing air filter and better flowing mufflers on a stock or bolt on car. Not the elbow, or the pipes. The mandrel bends really only help when you start moving more air through the car.
 
J

Jbauer

New Member
Jan 20, 2008
506
0
0
Apr 28, 2008
#27
  • Apr 28, 2008
  • #27
yea..which is why i don't use BBK crap on my car. I can see how a CHROME intake with a BEND will cause you to lose power..
My kn came with a dyno sheet..same time of day, both with the engine at the same temp. shows i think it was a 10HPgain, but i knocked 5 down. Realistically- i think 5 hp is possible with an intake. its not noticable- but very possible.
 

Winters98GT

Whoop...whoop-whoop-whoop-whoop...GANGNAM STYLE!!!
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
5,520
1,291
224
H Town
Apr 28, 2008
#28
  • Apr 28, 2008
  • #28
yea..which is why i don't use BBK crap on my car. I can see how a CHROME intake with a BEND will cause you to lose power..
My kn came with a dyno sheet..same time of day, both with the engine at the same temp. shows i think it was a 10HPgain, but i knocked 5 down. Realistically- i think 5 hp is possible with an intake. its not noticable- but very possible.
Click to expand...

please dont believe what a company sends you, or even make up your own logic as to what you "think" it makes. Mods dont work that way. Thats misinformation. Once you strap your car to a dyno and make multiple runs, or have track info to back it up, then I would start making HP claims.

Im just not one for throwing out claims without evidence to back it up. Thats why I personally test all the stuff I put on my car, and try to keep the variables to a minimum to get real world results.
 
J

Jbauer

New Member
Jan 20, 2008
506
0
0
Apr 28, 2008
#29
  • Apr 28, 2008
  • #29
i dunno, i mean..it is a dyno sheet for a stock 99 GT..and i think 4 or 5 horses are possible, especially with an exhaust.
 

98V6 K.I.T.T.

Founding Member
Mar 6, 2001
2,049
0
46
Everett, Washington
Apr 29, 2008
#30
  • Apr 29, 2008
  • #30
The thing is, logically it makes more horsepower. More air/colder air increases hp. Now, the thing is, how much more air flow does this give over the stock piece? Maybe not a ton, but some. Honestly I don't believe that a CAI really makes it's peak power until it's actually moving, thus this can't really be proven on a dyno. However something most everyone says is that the throttle response is alittle quicker which is nice. The reason why most people don't get one is because for 200+ dollars it's biggest pro is that it looks cooler, and the only people that will notice are at a car show, and IMO a CAI doesn't have anywhere near the same appeal as seeing a blower in the engine. An exhaust may not yield much more hp then a CAI, but atleast you are getting a noticeable sound and sometimes a better looking exhaust out back. CAI's are definately not a bad mod, but not going to give the instant gratification like for instance a gear swap would.
 
J

Jbauer

New Member
Jan 20, 2008
506
0
0
Apr 29, 2008
#31
  • Apr 29, 2008
  • #31
i completley agree. My KN intake didn't do jack. But it sounds cool. and it whistles. and it looks cool.
After i put it on, i was like "welp, thats a waste of money"...but if i had to do it again- i'd still buy it. That filter on the KN..its just so.. Huge. like, ya know?
 
R

Roos85

New Member
Mar 29, 2008
125
0
0
Maryland
Apr 29, 2008
#32
  • Apr 29, 2008
  • #32
I agree, it makes a cool noise looks good and it may only add a few horsepower but I would do it again as well
 

Winters98GT

Whoop...whoop-whoop-whoop-whoop...GANGNAM STYLE!!!
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
5,520
1,291
224
H Town
Apr 29, 2008
#33
  • Apr 29, 2008
  • #33
my 3rd 2v mustang. I wont put one near my car again.

If you want to drop money for a "swoosh" effect, cool, or you can just remove the stock silencer for free.
 

georgio440

Member
Nov 22, 2007
195
0
17
Walnut Creek, CA
Apr 29, 2008
#34
  • Apr 29, 2008
  • #34
I've got a C&L on mine:



The pipe is pretty huge, as is the air filter (which is in dire need of a cleaning). It sounds pretty cool and looks good. I guess that's about it.

BTW - Is it true that C&Ls cause the A/F ratio to be a little lean?
 
D

Dragstr05

New Member
Dec 21, 2004
643
1
0
Stafford VA
Apr 30, 2008
#35
  • Apr 30, 2008
  • #35
Jbauer said:
yea..which is why i don't use BBK crap on my car. I can see how a CHROME intake with a BEND will cause you to lose power..
My kn came with a dyno sheet..same time of day, both with the engine at the same temp. shows i think it was a 10HPgain, but i knocked 5 down. Realistically- i think 5 hp is possible with an intake. its not noticable- but very possible.
Click to expand...

How do you know this "test" wasnt on a car with a stock air filter with 30,000 miles on it?

Sorry, but I agree with winters on this one. The stock tubing is more than capable of supplying needed airflow on a mostly stock engine. Maybe with full intake mods, heads and cams...but otherwise, no.

The stock inlet tubing is HUGE for stock. Manufacturer dyno sheets dont mean ****. Even if its from the same day. They are in this to sell, thats why the numbers look so good.

With that said, I would buy JLT over another brand.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

S
Fuel ‘88 GT Runs Rich Cold — Fixes Itself When I Unplug Sensors (ECT, MAF, O2, etc.)
  • Sufarry
  • Nov 6, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
12
Views
853
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Nov 9, 2025
Mustang5L5
Keeps dying with new cold air intake
  • Creomod
  • Oct 27, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
32
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Nov 30, 2024
Jarhead67
J
B
'03 GT Fuel Pump/Pressure/Delivery Issue
  • Brodach
  • Oct 21, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
8
Views
911
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Oct 31, 2025
gkomo
New Member with a 1992
  • Clutchfork
  • Oct 18, 2025
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
5
Views
304
The Welcome Wagon Oct 19, 2025
Clutchfork
R
What's it Worth? 1997 Cobra, a ton of mods and restoration
  • riored97snake
  • Jun 18, 2026
  • What is it Worth?!?!?
Replies
2
Views
165
What is it Worth?!?!? Jun 21, 2026
riored97snake
R
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?