COLD AIR KIT=HOTAIR KIT

97predator said:
yes an intercooler/radiator is much different than a hollow tube. the fins increase the surface area through which heat can transfer, giving a higher transfer rate and while keeping pressure up. a hollow tube has parabolic velocity profile. the air near the inner wall will be hotter than the air in the center. the hotter tha intake tube is, the hotter the air charge becomes throughout. once the car is moving the underhood air draws heat of the tube, cooling the intake flow. this in effect with drawing air from outside the engine compartment will create some power. but i htink the greater beneffit is the smoothness of the air flow of a metal tube vs the stock squiggly plastic.
yeah, best bet is the plastic style ones like the FIPK with a surround on the filter. plus those bends do suck
 
Well can we at least agree that most popular CAI don't do much of anything except on boosted applications ie 03+Cobras and other blown Stangs? On N/A bolt on SOHC 4.6s (probably DOHCs as well) I think they're good for mostly cleaning up the engine bay at best.
 
RysRed96GT said:
actually, aluminum is a much higher conductor of heat ;)
Much higher than ??? Well, you are right that it does conduct at a relatively high level, that's true. Actually what I meant to say was that aluminum is great at dissapating heat. So it may absorb heat pretty easily, but it also looses it very quickly. ;) :nice:
 
the problem is that at the metal/air interface, the air velocity is zero. So yes, the air will get hot, but its not flowing either. 90% of the air flows though the centermost 75% of the diameter approximately. I could go into formulas and graphs, but if you really want to know, go to the library and read a book on heat transfer. Why the factory heats the throttle body- that I have no idea, maybe its to improve cold weather idle quality, as the air would be moving slowly enough to actually be heated. Once air gets flowing, it couldn't care less what temperature the pipe is that its flowing through-unless its really long and really hot. Anyway, under normal circumstances it doesn't make a difference.
 
302 coupe said:
90% of the air flows though the centermost 75% of the diameter approximately.

similiar to the reversion principle of large exhaust pipes

302 coupe said:
Why the factory heats the throttle body- that I have no idea, maybe its to improve cold weather idle quality, as the air would be moving slowly enough to actually be heated.

they heat the throttle body? im confused...
 
CatmanJJ said:
Well can we at least agree that most popular CAI don't do much of anything except on boosted applications ie 03+Cobras and other blown Stangs? On N/A bolt on SOHC 4.6s I think they're good for mostly cleaning up the engine bay at best.


:cheers: :stupid:

Man, I didnt mean to start a theory and principle war here. This is very useful info anyway
 
CrimsonCobra_01 said:
so you guys are sayin that a new cold air kit aint worth it then? cause if so then thats 150 bucks i dont need to spend
i would personally never buy something for 150 bucks that can only give me about 3 hp maybe...even risk losing some power from bends
 
302 coupe said:
the problem is that at the metal/air interface, the air velocity is zero. So yes, the air will get hot, but its not flowing either. 90% of the air flows though the centermost 75% of the diameter approximately. I could go into formulas and graphs, but if you really want to know, go to the library and read a book on heat transfer. Why the factory heats the throttle body- that I have no idea, maybe its to improve cold weather idle quality, as the air would be moving slowly enough to actually be heated. Once air gets flowing, it couldn't care less what temperature the pipe is that its flowing through-unless its really long and really hot. Anyway, under normal circumstances it doesn't make a difference.

no slip condition my man at the boundary layer. but i do believe off idle there is a heating of the air charge, just from observation and seat of the pants feel. the underhood air has gotten hot and is no longer absorbing heat from the tube, but actually heating it. heat transfers from warm to cold so there ya go. at idle=initial bog, at speed = benefits
 
RysRed96GT said:
similiar to the reversion principle of large exhaust pipes



they heat the throttle body? im confused...


One of my other cars is a 90 IROC. it had engine coolant routed to the TB stock. One free mod on those cars is to bypass this lowering the intake temp of the air coming into the engine.

I agree that the faster the air goes the less affect it will have. I guess my whole point is not to try to argue as much as just say I would not buy one of those metal air intakes. IMO they are kind of worthless. we could get out the calculator (or in my case take my shoes off) and go on all day. until you actually measure intake temps physically it is all talk. I mean wer are only talking a few hp N/A.
 
hognutz said:
your right an intercooler is differnet I am just saying I don't buy you velocity theory... ...Now if you can show me actual intake temps I will shut up. I have a feeling you are just running on your own logic.

This is an excerpt from an old post I made here and on the Corral. I dug it up by 'Searching'. I love that tool.

Aaron 4.6 said:
Well I spent some time this week putting together my own simulation of air temperatures based on the analysis that GulfCoastMustang presented late last week. He may be the only person that cares about the blood and guts, so the rest might prefer to simply skip to the results below.

Method- I used a simple heat balance just like GCM did setting mCpdT = Q = UAdT

System assumptions were CAI diameter of 3” and length of 28”, air inlet temp of 75F and ambient engine compartment temp of 145F. Tube thickness of .12” (might be a little too thick but it doesn’t affect the results) and a thermal conductivity of 16 W/m*K for steel.

I took the relevant properties of air (thermal conductivity, viscosity, density, heat capacity, Prandlt number) and used cubic spline functions in MathCAD to interpolate values over a range from –10 to 260 F.

Natural convection is hard to figure for the engine compartment, because no one knows exactly how air moves in there. Typical h values for natural convection are around 5-6 W/m2*K however, but I assumed 25 W/m2*K just to be safe.

Calculating an overall heat transfer coefficient at 200 CFM (flow rate at 2500 RPM) gave us U=2.6 W/K, which is pretty small (I used Dittus-Boelter to get hin values for the inside of the pipe). The overall temperature rise at those conditions is about 1.6 degrees F. Now at a worst case assumption where convective heat transfer is SO robust that the wall temperature is steady at 145F, the overall temperature rise is 7 degrees F (hin, which becomes U, for the inside of the pipe is 70 W/m2*K).

If you look at the Densecharger, which is made of ABS plastic, the thermal conductivity drops to about 0.9 W/m*K and the overall heat transfer coefficient and overall temperature increase goes practically to zero.


What it all means. There is no significant temperature effect introduced by a CAI, no matter which brand you buy. Unless your filter is exposed to engine bay air, a stock airbox, steel CAI, or plastic CAI will all have approximately the same inlet temperature to the intake plenum. Thus the ONLY benefit you should expect to see from a CAI is the performance increase gained by having a smooth pipe instead of rough rubber as the conduit for inlet air.
 
This thread has gone kinda off-topic so this is probably no longer relevant, but I'll throw it in anyway. Just go to Lowes/Home Depot, get some ABS pipe, and build your own. I did, and it works better than the K&N FIPK I had previously. Plus, I got it to where there is not a single bend in the pipe. Now you can't say that is bad for performance.
 
Just don't bother with the chrome crap, got really hot really quick. I had one in my 99 and does nothing in comparison to the FIPK. Plus I don't have that whistling sound with the FIPK like I did with the MAC.

But yes, the MAC / BBK is 'bling bling' showy. Intimidates ricers, but I was at the track last night with my FIPK (black plastic) and it was like 'so what'. Not enough colors to keep them interested. :nice:
 
I don't know whats up with you u guys getting hot air, I was happy ever since I installed my cold air intake. felt like 20 hp. Me and my uncle installed it in about an hour and when we where done. I took it out for a test drive and he said he felt a big difference.
 
quiksilver98 said:
I don't know whats up with you u guys getting hot air, I was happy ever since I installed my cold air intake. felt like 20 hp. Me and my uncle installed it in about an hour and when we where done. I took it out for a test drive and he said he felt a big difference.

I have never seen a cold air give more than 5hp on a newer stang.
 
quiksilver98 said:
I don't know whats up with you u guys getting hot air, I was happy ever since I installed my cold air intake. felt like 20 hp. Me and my uncle installed it in about an hour and when we where done. I took it out for a test drive and he said he felt a big difference.
no way to get 20 hp, unless there was a gerbil stuck in ur stock air hose...


hoznutz - absolutely right man. we're arguing over a tube. CAI's are worthless. all i have is like a 1.5' metal tube going between my TB and maf. the filter housing is bolted on the other end. it's not long enough ot make a difference, even as that one post reflects.

metal CAI's aer absolutely worthless. even regular ones, you're only gonna prolly get like 4 hp max. the bends are even worse, and those have been proven to be bad for air flow.
 
A local shop called mustang magic added a chrome intake to their bolt-on project GT and when they dynoed it, they found it only added 1hp.....the metal attracts heat...i would go with a plastic one like FIPK