• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

comp cams 292h cam kit? how is performance?

  • Thread starter Thread starter blackstallion12
  • Start date Start date Dec 13, 2009
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Dec 16, 2009
#21
  • Dec 16, 2009
  • #21
rbohm said:
not true at all. given the same specs, the roller cam will make more power due to less friction.
Click to expand...

And also due to the faster ramp rates opening the valves sooner.
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Dec 16, 2009
#22
  • Dec 16, 2009
  • #22
blkfrd said:
what question?

I don't get it... This guy is not looking at roller cams.
Click to expand...

He's also not looking at solids either. And if you don't get it, that's a personal problem I can't help you with.
 

S-Car-Go

Member
Mar 25, 2003
332
0
16
San Jose, CA
Dec 16, 2009
#23
  • Dec 16, 2009
  • #23
You guys are arguing apples to oranges. This should be "solid vs hyd" and/or
"roller vs flat". Crossing the lines has to many variables.

Solid is gonna make more power and make a faster car over a hydraulic. A roller will outlast a flat lifter.

Whether a HR makes more power over a SFT depends on more than that. Springs come into play and ramp rates. Added pressure increases drag even if there is a roller. Speaking in generalizations a "small HFT" will make more power than a "small HR" and a "Large HR" will make more power than a "Large HFT".

ie an XE262H makes more power than a XE264HR and a XE284H makes less power than a XE282HR given the same engine (per Comp dyno sheets)

In a perfect world this application should be a solid roller, but if he had that money to spend he should be putting into better heads which is where he is going to find the power he wants.
 
H

htwheelz67

Member
May 18, 2007
444
0
16
mission viejo ca.
Dec 16, 2009
#24
  • Dec 16, 2009
  • #24
a hyd roller is perfectly capable of making big power and keeping drivability, solid rollers can make even more power and be street friendly a roller will always make more hp than a flat tappet and have better drivability. If you plan on a big azz cam then better add big azz compression and big azz gears with a 289.
If its mainly strip then a comp hyd flat tappet will work but I would look at a dual pattern cam if using ported stockers unless they are professionally ported and flowed you can make up for head shortcomings with proper cam timing, I'd look at comps cam spec catalog and for a slight charge they can grind you a custom cam with the proper LCA and int/ex duration/lift to fit your combo. Best bet would be call them (a couple different times) and see what they recommend, otherwise call Jay Allen (camshaft innovations) or some of the other cam gurus as they can grind you a cam to match your combo and usage and a custom cam is not much more than an OTS one and will usually always go faster and drive better. If you want to go fast at the strip, why not ditch the 289 for a 351w? theres an instant 60hp/60+ftlbs to start with and much stronger. Or better yet.......BOOOOOST it a turbo will add more hp than even the biggest cam can.
 
B

blackstallion12

New Member
Dec 13, 2009
40
0
0
Dec 17, 2009
#25
  • Dec 17, 2009
  • #25
guys guys guys!!!! im blushing awwww you guys are cute all fightin wit each odder! but on a serious note you guys are the bees knees.... so frickin helpful. i think im gonna choose the 282s on account of its stability at higher rpm unfortunately its about 50 bucks more than the 292.
 
B

blackstallion12

New Member
Dec 13, 2009
40
0
0
Dec 17, 2009
#26
  • Dec 17, 2009
  • #26
i am keeping the original engine on account of finances in the future a stroker 351w will be in my sights... also its the original block for the car so thats kinda why im keeping it around. but yes if i was doing a similar build on a 351w i would be blown away with power output compared to the lil 289. also i have considered a 100 shot of juice and that is the plan for the near future.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

D
First post 289 rebuild question!
  • Ddyer2868
  • Nov 24, 2025
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Replies
3
Views
261
Classic Mustang Specific Tech Dec 5, 2025
rednotch
My first post
  • myproGTv
  • May 31, 2026
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
2
Views
120
The Welcome Wagon May 31, 2026
myproGTv
H
Forced Induction On3 Turbo Kit- Parts list NEEDED - 302 Stock Motor
  • Hirothecool1
  • Feb 27, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 7, 2026
slow84lx
S
D
Engine HO cam in non HO roller block ‘93 f150
  • DanC1993f150
  • Mar 21, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
315
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 29, 2026
General karthief
M
comp cams 281hr
  • mobilly
  • Mar 20, 2025
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
18
Views
595
The Welcome Wagon Mar 23, 2025
89ripper
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?