• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Compression and Spark Plugs

  • Thread starter Thread starter 7upstang91
  • Start date Start date Feb 3, 2010
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

7upstang91

10 Year Member
May 30, 2008
936
124
74
Florida
Feb 3, 2010
#1
  • Feb 3, 2010
  • #1
As some of you may know, I had received a bad tune for from a horrible tuner who lied to me. I found this out last month. I'm pissed. Anyway I am going to do a compression test before anything else to see where I stand from the bad tune. What compression should I be looking for in each cylinder for my 331? Also why I am there what spark plugs would you guys recommend if they are bad and what gap should they be?


Thank you for your help!
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,368
18,115
224
Massachusetts
Feb 3, 2010
#2
  • Feb 3, 2010
  • #2
I think consistency between cylinders is more important than actual numbers. But from what i've seen, healthy motors are usually in the 150psi+ range I believe?? I could be wrong as it's been a while since i've dealt with comp tests.

I'd get your numbers and post them up and ask opinions.

As for plugs...depends on combo and ignition. Boosted car? I'd go iridium plugs.
 

SpartaPerformance

10 Year Member
Nov 5, 2006
2,517
61
89
Long Island NY
Feb 3, 2010
#3
  • Feb 3, 2010
  • #3
Compression can range from 120 - 170 but Mustang5L5 is correct consistency is key!! 10% variance between cylinders is optimal.
 

7upstang91

10 Year Member
May 30, 2008
936
124
74
Florida
Feb 4, 2010
#4
  • Feb 4, 2010
  • #4
SpartaPerformance said:
Compression can range from 120 - 170 but Mustang5L5 is correct consistency is key!! 10% variance between cylinders is optimal.
Click to expand...

I figured consistency was key, just wasn't 100% sure about the range. 120 seems rather low to me, as well as 170 is rather high. 150 is a good number to go off??
 
P

project67

New Member
Feb 26, 2006
116
0
0
Feb 4, 2010
#5
  • Feb 4, 2010
  • #5
Mustang5L5 said:
get your numbers and post them up and ask opinions.
Click to expand...
 

Repostyle

Member
Jun 11, 2005
538
0
16
Portland, OR
Feb 5, 2010
#6
  • Feb 5, 2010
  • #6
The numbers you get depend on a couple of things, you can't just go by motor size. It depends on heads, stroke, bore, rockers, cam. All those things can change the numbers it "should" have. At this point any numbers are just guesses. The most important thing is that they are all within about 10psi. If they are off by more than that, try and get them to the highest number, since problems like valves not seated properly or bad rings, or leaking head gasket drop compression.
 

90mustangGT

I felt sorry for girls because
Founding Member
Jan 15, 2002
2,773
17
89
Dallas, GA
Feb 5, 2010
#7
  • Feb 5, 2010
  • #7
Get the engine warm. The difference in temp can make a difference.

Pull all spark plugs. This allows the engine to spin at a higher RPM and gets a better reading, also easier on your starter and battery. Just the proper way by the book as well.

Either disconnect the power to the fuel and spark, or better yet, turn the motor over by jumping the solonoid. Ignition systems don't like to be ungrounded, you don't want to be the ground yourself, nor do you want to start any fires, so disconnect the ignition. If the injectors are spraying fuel, it may alter the test results by the fuel buildup and/or the fuel washing down the rings. If you just jump the solonoid, neither one of these will be active and you will get the best results.

Have something hold the throttle wide open, so the air supply doesn't alter the results.

When spinning the engine over, note the time it takes to build compression. 70psi is minimum for combustion. I've noticed that engines with worn rings tend to take a while to get usable compression. If some cylinders are way down, that is a good indicator you have a problem with that cylinder.

Then there is the leakdown test. There is a tool for this, but you can also hook up a compressed air supply to the cylinder on it's compression stroke and listen to see where the air is going and how much is leaking from the cylinders.
 

7upstang91

10 Year Member
May 30, 2008
936
124
74
Florida
Feb 6, 2010
#8
  • Feb 6, 2010
  • #8
90mustangGT said:
Get the engine warm. The difference in temp can make a difference.

Pull all spark plugs. This allows the engine to spin at a higher RPM and gets a better reading, also easier on your starter and battery. Just the proper way by the book as well.

Either disconnect the power to the fuel and spark, or better yet, turn the motor over by jumping the solonoid. Ignition systems don't like to be ungrounded, you don't want to be the ground yourself, nor do you want to start any fires, so disconnect the ignition. If the injectors are spraying fuel, it may alter the test results by the fuel buildup and/or the fuel washing down the rings. If you just jump the solonoid, neither one of these will be active and you will get the best results.

Have something hold the throttle wide open, so the air supply doesn't alter the results.

When spinning the engine over, note the time it takes to build compression. 70psi is minimum for combustion. I've noticed that engines with worn rings tend to take a while to get usable compression. If some cylinders are way down, that is a good indicator you have a problem with that cylinder.

Then there is the leakdown test. There is a tool for this, but you can also hook up a compressed air supply to the cylinder on it's compression stroke and listen to see where the air is going and how much is leaking from the cylinders.
Click to expand...

Thank you for the advice, I should be able to get the readings tonight. I have the kit ready to go. I also am going to do the test with two other guys whom have performed the test before.

Also Iridium plugs were recommend, anyone second that statement? Maybe have another opinion?

Any advice is more than welcome. Thank you for all advice so far!
 

90mustangGT

I felt sorry for girls because
Founding Member
Jan 15, 2002
2,773
17
89
Dallas, GA
Feb 6, 2010
#9
  • Feb 6, 2010
  • #9
7upstang91 said:
Thank you for the advice, I should be able to get the readings tonight. I have the kit ready to go. I also am going to do the test with two other guys whom have performed the test before.

Also Iridium plugs were recommend, anyone second that statement? Maybe have another opinion?

Any advice is more than welcome. Thank you for all advice so far!
Click to expand...

Anytime.

Copper plugs for our cars. My truck runs irridium plugs, expensive bastards that were designed for the truck, which has coil on plug, runs much more voltage, but goes 100K between tune-ups. You will probally only have poor performance and foul the iridiums on your motor.
 

7upstang91

10 Year Member
May 30, 2008
936
124
74
Florida
Feb 6, 2010
#10
  • Feb 6, 2010
  • #10
90mustangGT said:
Anytime.

Copper plugs for our cars. My truck runs irridium plugs, expensive bastards that were designed for the truck, which has coil on plug, runs much more voltage, but goes 100K between tune-ups. You will probally only have poor performance and foul the iridiums on your motor.
Click to expand...

thanks man! I need to go look into some decent plugs then, could you recommend any? Unless copper is the name and now I feel like an idiot.
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,368
18,115
224
Massachusetts
Feb 7, 2010
#11
  • Feb 7, 2010
  • #11
Stock Ford motorcraft copper plugs. Cheapest plug on the market, but for some reason the 5.0's love them.

Not like doing a plug change on a 5.0 is hard. No real reason to run anything else if you are N/A.

Now if you had a power adder, then i'd go NGK iridium's
 

7upstang91

10 Year Member
May 30, 2008
936
124
74
Florida
Feb 8, 2010
#12
  • Feb 8, 2010
  • #12
Mustang5L5 said:
Stock Ford motorcraft copper plugs. Cheapest plug on the market, but for some reason the 5.0's love them.

Not like doing a plug change on a 5.0 is hard. No real reason to run anything else if you are N/A.

Now if you had a power adder, then i'd go NGK iridium's
Click to expand...

NGK Iridiums it is. What should I gap them to on a 331 with a supercharger?
 

7upstang91

10 Year Member
May 30, 2008
936
124
74
Florida
Mar 19, 2010
#13
  • Mar 19, 2010
  • #13
Mustang5L5 said:
Stock Ford motorcraft copper plugs. Cheapest plug on the market, but for some reason the 5.0's love them.

Not like doing a plug change on a 5.0 is hard. No real reason to run anything else if you are N/A.

Now if you had a power adder, then i'd go NGK iridium's
Click to expand...

Hopefully going to finally get the numbers tonight.
Any specific numbers (spark plug wise), I will replace them tonight, because they are fouled. I mean, I want a part number(I don't want to get the wrong one).
 

liljoe07

5 Year Member
Feb 18, 2009
1,622
363
124
Cartersville,Ga
Mar 19, 2010
#14
  • Mar 19, 2010
  • #14
Autolite 3925's
 

Cobra1741

Member
Mar 9, 2010
152
1
16
Mar 19, 2010
#15
  • Mar 19, 2010
  • #15
go with the ngk! make sure all the cylinders are pretty much within 5-10% of eachother when testing the compression. i guess that would be optimum
 

NIKwoaC

中國製造
15 Year Member
Oct 31, 2006
5,525
943
214
Chengdu Province
Mar 19, 2010
#16
  • Mar 19, 2010
  • #16
I've been running Autolite iridium plugs for years. No problems here.

Also, AFR may have a "suggested" plug for their heads. You should look into that.
 

7upstang91

10 Year Member
May 30, 2008
936
124
74
Florida
Mar 20, 2010
#17
  • Mar 20, 2010
  • #17
NikwoaC said:
I've been running Autolite iridium plugs for years. No problems here.

Also, AFR may have a "suggested" plug for their heads. You should look into that.
Click to expand...

I emailed NGk a month ago and they told me which ones to get, the only problem is I have to order them from NGK. No one cares them so I was looking for another one I could run for a couple weeks. Turns out Napa was out of those too. Just went with a basic copper plug and gapped them to 30 thousandths.

1: 175
2: 175
3: 175
4: 180
5: 175
6: 180
7: 175
8: 180

These are the numbers I got tonight from my 331. Give or take one psi.
Any thoughts? I thought they seems like very good numbers to me.
 

liljoe07

5 Year Member
Feb 18, 2009
1,622
363
124
Cartersville,Ga
Mar 20, 2010
#18
  • Mar 20, 2010
  • #18
Yes, they're perfectly fine. Quit sweating it. Raise that gap up about .005
 

7upstang91

10 Year Member
May 30, 2008
936
124
74
Florida
Mar 20, 2010
#19
  • Mar 20, 2010
  • #19
liljoe07 said:
Yes, they're perfectly fine. Quit sweating it. Raise that gap up about .005
Click to expand...

Ah, just my old tuner wasn't very good. In fact people have laughed in the past when I say who the tuner was. Anyway, another tuner who is a Ford only tuner told me .030, very well know guy who is booked two months in advance. Thank you for that advice. I'm gunna ask him today about raising the gapping then!
 

liljoe07

5 Year Member
Feb 18, 2009
1,622
363
124
Cartersville,Ga
Mar 20, 2010
#20
  • Mar 20, 2010
  • #20
I didn't read the supercharger part. Leave the gap where it is.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Electrical Spark Plugs
  • jimzzilla
  • Feb 24, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
42
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Feb 28, 2026
jimzzilla
3
393W Stroker with Boost - Need Spark Plug Recommendations
  • 387lx
  • Apr 29, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
363
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 30, 2026
HotFox
A
1987 5.0 speed density Foxbody crank no start
  • Alan2204
  • May 23, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
10
Views
559
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 30, 2026
Mcmahst
L
Engine Why won't the motor start if I have spark and fuel
  • LeviAnderson
  • Nov 20, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
554
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Nov 20, 2025
AeroCoupe
J
'04 3.8L V6 mineral deposits and oil on #3 cylinder. Does it need a rebuild or something simpler?
  • joeybuddy96
  • Mar 18, 2026
  • SN95 V6 Mustang Tech
Replies
15
Views
659
SN95 V6 Mustang Tech Sep 29, 2026
gkomo
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?