• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

Compression check numbers

  • Thread starter Thread starter 1105
  • Start date Start date Dec 3, 2003

1105

I AM the random post master...bow down
May 3, 2003
3,841
0
0
Daytona Bch, FL
Dec 3, 2003
#1
  • Dec 3, 2003
  • #1
I removed my smog equipment and decided to do a compression check on my car at the same time and come up with these numbers.

1. 160
2. 155
3. 155
4. 160
5. 150
6. 150
7. 150
8. 150

are these goos numbers to be getting? My dad thought that I might have a bad piston ring and suggected that I do a check. Also, I took a picture of my spark plugs while they were out... tell me what you think about them. It seems to be the further back on the block they are, the leaner they become
 

TrueBlue95GT

Member
Sep 29, 2003
966
0
16
Connecticut
Dec 3, 2003
#2
  • Dec 3, 2003
  • #2
Those are good numbers. They're all about the same and at a normal pressure. My plugs are the same way.
 

Rootus

Officially Addicted
Feb 8, 2003
6,659
1
0
Portland, Oregon
Dec 3, 2003
#3
  • Dec 3, 2003
  • #3
Those compression numbers look good. But [a few of] those plugs look bad, yikes. Definitely lean towards the back. Stock intake?

Dave
 

GTJake

Founding Member
Oct 28, 2002
3,049
0
56
Ann Arbor, MI
Dec 3, 2003
#4
  • Dec 3, 2003
  • #4
Mine did that after the Eddy Preformer so I just cranked up the fuel pressure until they looked good.

Jake
 

1105

I AM the random post master...bow down
May 3, 2003
3,841
0
0
Daytona Bch, FL
Dec 3, 2003
#5
  • Dec 3, 2003
  • #5
I have the edelbrock performer intake... i dont have a fuel pressure reg so I cant crank it up unless I pull the vac hose... but then it'll just be at 40psi all the time
 

Rootus

Officially Addicted
Feb 8, 2003
6,659
1
0
Portland, Oregon
Dec 3, 2003
#6
  • Dec 3, 2003
  • #6
I'm surprised that you would see a lean condition with the Edelbrock intake -- the stock one is known for having flow discrepancies between cylinders, but the Edel is pretty dang good at evening all that out. My plugs are just uniformly black .

Dave
 

VibrantRedGT

"STANGNET'S PENGUIN SMACKER"
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
14,679
424
154
Boca Raton, Florida
Dec 3, 2003
#7
  • Dec 3, 2003
  • #7
Numbers are good but 3 of those plugs are really white. Could be just the picture quality though.
 
5

5.0GT-Neal

Founding Member
Sep 24, 2002
370
0
0
Dec 3, 2003
#8
  • Dec 3, 2003
  • #8
yah the numbers are good and consistent..

neal
 

OinkAodeOink

Founding Member
Jun 5, 2002
3,026
1
0
Daytona bch, Florida
Dec 4, 2003
#9
  • Dec 4, 2003
  • #9
good comp #'s.. doubt you have a bad piston/ring with those #'s.

Look at plug #1.. its pitch black, obivously runnin pretty rich on that cylinder. The rest look just like mine did when i had bolt ons. These cars run lean to begin with.

About the mis.....

*Quoted from another post*

"it might not be a missfire at all. it could be your balancer is going bad and causing a vibration thus acting like a missfire. that's what it sounds like to me. they usually go bad around 100k miles so i'd check to see if any rubber is sticking out the back of your harmonic balancer. if it is, then it's junk."

Last time we checked your balancer had a nice whobble to it, and i bet you the rubber has worked its way out. This would defintalty make the car shake like it has a mis. The balancer would be the first thing ide replace, if it were me. your engines at stake
 

1105

I AM the random post master...bow down
May 3, 2003
3,841
0
0
Daytona Bch, FL
Dec 4, 2003
#10
  • Dec 4, 2003
  • #10
I guess a balancer and some new o2's are next on my list of things to get for my car. Which balancer should I buy when I go to get one?
 

str8stang036

New Member
Dec 28, 2002
1,382
0
0
Miami
Dec 4, 2003
#11
  • Dec 4, 2003
  • #11
What would be some bad compression #`s? I plan on doing the test myself next week.
 
R

rockin_rick

Member
Oct 9, 2003
968
1
17
Dec 4, 2003
#12
  • Dec 4, 2003
  • #12
It's my understanding that the actual numbers are not that important (within reason), as long as they are all within 10% of each other. Perhaps someone else could confirm/deny this claim.

Rick
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

D
Engine Questions on compression test results
  • dqureshi06
  • Jan 6, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
5
Views
382
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jan 7, 2025
Noobz347
C
Engine Cylinder 5,,7, & 8 run significantly cooler than the other cylinders
  • Crisfixes
  • Sep 27, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
1
Views
213
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Sep 27, 2025
Noobz347
S
Fuel ‘88 GT Runs Rich Cold — Fixes Itself When I Unplug Sensors (ECT, MAF, O2, etc.)
  • Sufarry
  • Nov 6, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
12
Views
706
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Nov 9, 2025
Mustang5L5
R
1994 GT 5.0L crank no start
  • Red1994MustangGT
  • Apr 15, 2025
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
1K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Aug 19, 2025
Kurt_MO
K
D
Roller rockers with no compression
  • DPORTER0729
  • Jan 14, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
876
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 23, 2025
mobilly
M
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?