• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Compression Check

  • Thread starter Thread starter jspagna1
  • Start date Start date Apr 10, 2009

jspagna1

Member
Jan 23, 2007
53
0
6
Connecticut
Apr 10, 2009
#1
  • Apr 10, 2009
  • #1
I have a question about compression ratio.
If the Ford Racing 5.0L Crate Motor with the GT40(Iron Heads) + (B303) Cam has a compression ratio of 9.0:1, than what or would the compression ratio change with the following changes:

1.7 Roller Rockers
Trick Flow Twisted Wedge Aluminum Heads(out of the box)

Thinking about adding a Supercharger. That's why I'm asking.
Thanks
 
Z

zigmont

Member
Mar 2, 2009
81
0
6
Apr 10, 2009
#2
  • Apr 10, 2009
  • #2
compression

The compression ratio (C/R) is the ratio between the area in the cylinder and the area remaining when the piston is at top dead center (TDC) to arrive at the C/R you would devide the cylinder volume by the combustion chamber volume.
An example would be: if the cylinder volume was 625 cc's and the combustion chamber was 64 cc's, you would devide 625 by 64 and would have a 9.76 to 1 compression ratio.
Problem is.... you can't just go by the volume of the combustion chambers. Keep in mind that if your pistons are dished or notched for valve clearance you would have to add the volume of that to the combustion chamber. There are other issuses like head gasket thickness and deck clearance to consider, as this could further lower the compression ratio.
So.....If the total volume of the dish/notches/head gasket was 5 cc's your total combustion chamber volume would now be 69 cc's (64 + 5). Now devide 625 by 69 and your actual C/R would be 9.05 to 1. with a 64 cc head.
Since changing your rocker arms wouldn't affect your combustion chamber volume it would not change your C/R.
On the other hand, changing the cylinder head could either raise or lower the C/R depending on what size the combustion chambers were.
If your GT 40 heads have 64 cc chambers, and the TW heads also have 64 cc chambers, your C/R would not change.
If the TW chambers were larger, the C/R would be lower. If the TW chambers were smaller, the C/R would be higher. Hope this helps.

Zig
 

blown65

Founding Member
Jul 7, 1999
1,938
4
39
Queen Creek Arizona
Apr 10, 2009
#3
  • Apr 10, 2009
  • #3
Pretty much what zig said, what is the CC of the chamber of the old vs new heads? The TW looks to come in 61-65cc variety and the GT40 in 64. TW205s I think are 65 cc so you would be the same compression.

9-1 compression is no big deal, just cant go crazy with boost/timing or ya gotta run some race gas.

What are you thinking of running?
 
S

stonecoldtx

Member
Aug 4, 2007
214
2
18
Dallas, TX
Apr 10, 2009
#4
  • Apr 10, 2009
  • #4
zigmont said:
The compression ratio (C/R) is the ratio between the area in the cylinder and the area remaining when the piston is at top dead center (TDC) to arrive at the C/R you would devide the cylinder volume by the combustion chamber volume.
An example would be: if the cylinder volume was 625 cc's and the combustion chamber was 64 cc's, you would devide 625 by 64 and would have a 9.76 to 1 compression ratio.
Problem is.... you can't just go by the volume of the combustion chambers. Keep in mind that if your pistons are dished or notched for valve clearance you would have to add the volume of that to the combustion chamber. There are other issuses like head gasket thickness and deck clearance to consider, as this could further lower the compression ratio.
So.....If the total volume of the dish/notches/head gasket was 5 cc's your total combustion chamber volume would now be 69 cc's (64 + 5). Now devide 625 by 69 and your actual C/R would be 9.05 to 1. with a 64 cc head.
Since changing your rocker arms wouldn't affect your combustion chamber volume it would not change your C/R.
On the other hand, changing the cylinder head could either raise or lower the C/R depending on what size the combustion chambers were.
If your GT 40 heads have 64 cc chambers, and the TW heads also have 64 cc chambers, your C/R would not change.
If the TW chambers were larger, the C/R would be lower. If the TW chambers were smaller, the C/R would be higher. Hope this helps.

Zig
Click to expand...


Well, that's a close description . . . the actual volume you would consider would include the volume of the cylinder at bottom dead center, the volume of the head gasket and the volume of the combustion chamber added all together to arrive at the total you would divide when the cylinder is at TDC.

For example, a 302 has a 4.0" bore and a 3.0" stroke; that means that you would take 4 divided by 2 squared, multiplied by 3.1416 to get the area of a circle, times 3 to get the volume of the cylinder, then times 16.387 to convert to CC's (it comes out to 617.78 cc's; there are metric conversion calculators all over the internet you can use though).

Next, you would find the volume of the head gasket; most of the oneswe would use would have a diameter of 4.125" and a compressed thickness of .040", so you would use the same formula as you did with the cylinder--Pi*r-squared (in this case it would be 4.125 divided by 2 times itself, which equals 4.25, and then multiply that by 3.1416, and then multiply that figure by .040, and finally, multiply that by 16.387; the total in this case would be a volume of 8.76 cc's).

The cc volume of a standard 302 piston is something like 8cc's (for the Speed Pro H273CP Hypereutectic piston).

Add them together:

617.78 - cylinder volume
8.76 - head gasket volume
8.00 - piston dish/valve relief volume
64.00 - combustion chamber volume
-----------
698.54 - total of all volumes

Then, you would divide that by the total volume that would be above the piston crown at TDC:

8.76 - head gasket volume
8.00 - piston dish/valve relief volume
64.00 - combustion chamber volume
-----------
80.76

Therefore, the compression ratio would be: 698.54 divided by 80.76, or 8.65:1

I just did a quick search on Google, and found this handy little compression calculator:

Engine Compression Ratio (CR) Calculator

as you can see, there are quite a few things to consider besides just the cylinder head combustion chamber volume . . .
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Need some advice on upgrading GT-40-X303 heads
  • 93gtmustang
  • Sep 1, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
16
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 5, 2024
Noobz347
S
Holley High-ram tuning settings
  • spencergt66
  • Apr 1, 2026
  • Digital Self-tuning Forum
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
363
Digital Self-tuning Forum May 12, 2026
spencergt66
S
M
Engine Unexplainable Exhaust Pop and Gurgle
  • Mrnissen122
  • Feb 14, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
12
Views
459
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Feb 18, 2026
Noobz347
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
640
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 28, 2026
Noobz347
9
Forced Induction Prepping for supercharger on non-stock build
  • 91fox427
  • Nov 25, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
366
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jan 5, 2026
Qtrhrse23
Q
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?