• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

Compression Test Q's

  • Thread starter Thread starter chirs
  • Start date Start date Jul 30, 2005
C

chirs

New Member
Oct 14, 2003
60
0
0
Georgia
Jul 30, 2005
#1
  • Jul 30, 2005
  • #1
I recently rebuilt my 302, bored 30 over, and used a factory summit piston and ring package. I ran a compression test on one cylinder, and it came up 130. This was slightly alarming but.........I have a few questions. I am at sea level and i believe that the standard pressure is 14.7. The stock replacement kit said the pistons would have 9:1 compression, but i am running gt-40 heads which, if im not mistaken, have a larger combustion chamber and thus would lower compression. The rings have not yet seated, less than 50 miles. I figure my compression ratio is around 8.5-8.8:1. So , i would take 14.7 X 8.8 = 129.36. Correct me if im wrong, but does this look right? Also, will my compression go up further when the rings are seated? I will test all the others tomorrow, was dark here, but should i be alarmed or as long as they are all the same then i should be ok right? Thanks,

Chris
 

abusedstang

New Member
Apr 10, 2005
103
0
0
East Hampton, CT
Jul 30, 2005
#2
  • Jul 30, 2005
  • #2
my 94 gt has 143k on the ticker and all 8 cylinders showed 125 psi plus or minus 3 psi. Wasn't sure if the pressure was good. I was just relieved that all 8 were even!!!
 

HISSIN50

"How long does it take to get help in here?
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
31,179
34
129
Jul 30, 2005
#3
  • Jul 30, 2005
  • #3
That test tells not too much since there are too many variables and not enough data. Comp testing is only decent for relative (cylinder to cylinder) comparison IMHO. There are too many methods and variances in testing to compare absolute numbers. And extreme cams can lower compression.

If the motor is not broken in, that is another variable. I would not sweat it myself. The compression can go up a bit once rings seat.

Good luck Chris.
 
C

chirs

New Member
Oct 14, 2003
60
0
0
Georgia
Jul 30, 2005
#4
  • Jul 30, 2005
  • #4
Thanks, upon further reseach, i messed up a few things. One the throttle body is supposed to be held open during the test and the engine is supposed to be a normal operating temp. Neither of which were done. According to the same website, without performing both of those steps, one would experience significantly lower numbers.
 

HISSIN50

"How long does it take to get help in here?
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
31,179
34
129
Jul 30, 2005
#5
  • Jul 30, 2005
  • #5
chirs said:
Thanks, upon further reseach, i messed up a few things. One the throttle body is supposed to be held open during the test and the engine is supposed to be a normal operating temp. Neither of which were done. According to the same website, without performing both of those steps, one would experience significantly lower numbers.
Click to expand...
Yep. Those are a couple of the variances I was talking about. Having the motor warm does help a good bit (not as much as with forged pistons, but still makes a difference). Also numbers can go up a hair from having all plugs pulled (starter can turn the motor over more efficiently for a given amount of cranking interval).

Relative numbers will be much more important.

Good luck.
 
C

chirs

New Member
Oct 14, 2003
60
0
0
Georgia
Jul 30, 2005
#6
  • Jul 30, 2005
  • #6
Thanks again, im not too worried now.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Engine Looking for suggestions and or ideas
  • PonyGTrider
  • Aug 25, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
17
Views
646
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Sep 7, 2026
PonyGTrider
F
Ford 460 swap
  • Ford460
  • Sep 13, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
6
Views
449
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Sep 14, 2026
Ford460
F
D
Engine Questions on compression test results
  • dqureshi06
  • Jan 6, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
5
Views
553
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jan 7, 2025
Noobz347
R
What's it Worth? 1997 Cobra, a ton of mods and restoration
  • riored97snake
  • Jun 18, 2026
  • What is it Worth?!?!?
Replies
2
Views
467
What is it Worth?!?!? Jun 21, 2026
riored97snake
R
D
Roller rockers with no compression
  • DPORTER0729
  • Jan 14, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 23, 2025
mobilly
M
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?