• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

compression test results. should i be worried??

  • Thread starter Thread starter Foxfan88
  • Start date Start date Jun 14, 2008

Foxfan88

My Grandpa has great wood.
Sep 13, 2004
2,487
4
0
Miami, Ok
Jun 14, 2008
#1
  • Jun 14, 2008
  • #1
been tinker on my car this weekend and last night it had a bad miss under high RPM. i suspected that it was the fact i am running the stock ignition i'm running on my combo.

i pulled all the plugs to close to gap up to see if that would help etc so i figured i would run a compression test while its easy....

engine was cold.... i cut off fuel, spark and hooked up the compression gauge to each hole and here are my results

cyl 4- 160 psi cyl 8- 170
cyl 3- 178 cyl 7- 180
cyl 2- 172 cyl 6- 175
cyl 1- 172 cyl 5- 175

all look to be good except for cyl 4 making 160, not a bad number just considerably lower than the rest.

i hooked up an air compressor to that cyl to see if could get some bubbling out the radiator if i had a bad head gasket, no bubbles.

the only thing i can think off that it might be.
when i had the engine apart all my lifters were pumped up TIGHT, when i tried to adjust my rockers it would just hold the valves open and would compress the lifter plunger. so i took them to work and make a little tool to compress the lifters with an arbor press so get all the oil out of them so they were free again.

when i did this i made the mistake of leaving one lifter at home and never smashed the oil out of it. i ended up assembling the engine anyways.

engine ran fine, less than a week later i had the engine apart again and i went to adjust rockers again and i notice the same lifter that i never bled out was still pumped up TIGHT, it never compressed after running the engine.

i went ahead and adjusted the rockers and that one lifter pushed the valve open a bit instead of preloading the lifter, i was hoping it would compress after a few heat cycles.

and this lifter is in the same cyl that i got the lower compression readings? but if the valve was still being help open i doubt it would even make that much pressure on during the test.. i put .030 preload on the lifters so if the valve was still being held open it would be .030 open, about 1/32 of and inch.

just looking for ideas... the engine runs smooth and all. should i be too worried about that one cyl being a tad lower than the rest...? i mean i can pull the VCs and see if the lifter still is pumped up to tight...

they say to have them within 10% of each other, highest was 180 and lowest was 160 so thats 12%, not much more....
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,220
17,902
224
Massachusetts
Jun 14, 2008
#2
  • Jun 14, 2008
  • #2
The numbers look acceptable to me


If i saw a 120 or 13o in there then i'd be worried
 
D

Deleted member 87397

Jun 15, 2008
#3
  • Jun 15, 2008
  • #3
As long as they are all within 10% of each other and no head gasket issues, you are good.
 

Foxfan88

My Grandpa has great wood.
Sep 13, 2004
2,487
4
0
Miami, Ok
Jun 15, 2008
#4
  • Jun 15, 2008
  • #4
well there is a 12% difference b/w the highest and lower numbers.... 160 is lowest and 180 is highest...

it runs good i will just run it and if something happens then its nothing i havent done before haha.
 

Fast63

New Member
Sep 20, 2007
717
0
0
Jun 15, 2008
#5
  • Jun 15, 2008
  • #5
Foxfan88 said:
when i had the engine apart all my lifters were pumped up TIGHT, when i tried to adjust my rockers it would just hold the valves open and would compress the lifter plunger. so i took them to work and make a little tool to compress the lifters with an arbor press so get all the oil out of them so they were free again.
Click to expand...

Normal for this to happen bud. Big no-no to screw around with lifter plungers IMO.

Compression results look fine though.

Since the engine runs smooth and all, there is no need to worry about anything.
 

SVT32VDOHC

waiting for the next hack atta
Founding Member
Nov 22, 2001
3,501
28
119
Motor City
Jun 16, 2008
#6
  • Jun 16, 2008
  • #6
Those are close enough. I've never performed a compression test, but just reading on here, as long as they are close like that, you're fine. I have read where guys were around 100 in a cylinder or two, and that is a little scary.
 

Ike83

Member
Sep 27, 2006
0
0
17
St. Louis, Missouri
Jun 16, 2008
#7
  • Jun 16, 2008
  • #7
What would be considered "normal" psi on a 302? Let's say the engine was brand new back in 1987? What psi would I be looking for on a new engine?
 

Fast63

New Member
Sep 20, 2007
717
0
0
Jun 16, 2008
#8
  • Jun 16, 2008
  • #8
I don't know, but my 85 GT with a carbed HO only had 110 psi stock and 135 after I increased the compression to 10.13:1 Maybe my gauge was off though, I dunno.

I have seen guys on here and elsewhere saying anywhere from 140 to 170 around your year stang.
 

gtss

Member
Apr 30, 2002
133
2
19
Airdrie,Alberta
Jun 16, 2008
#9
  • Jun 16, 2008
  • #9
There really is not a "normal psi" because there are too many variables, altitude, barometric pressure, the tester itself etc.
the official Ford spec is that the lowest be at least 75% of the highest, and you are well within that

so as others have said, it runs good, no worries

gtss
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

H
Ongoing Battle With Hydraulic Lifters
  • hailer06
  • Jun 8, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
205
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 9, 2026
Noobz347
G
Engine Pushrod Length Question
  • germain101
  • Sep 22, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
12
Views
525
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Sep 25, 2025
Noobz347
D
Engine Questions on compression test results
  • dqureshi06
  • Jan 6, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
5
Views
400
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jan 7, 2025
Noobz347
D
Rockers, lash adjusters and timing: help with parts (4.6 2v)
  • dvigAtel
  • Nov 1, 2025
  • Other Auto Tech
Replies
0
Views
219
Other Auto Tech Nov 1, 2025
dvigAtel
D
Engine 87 NA - Tune or no Tune needed?
  • R82148V
  • Sep 17, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
8
Views
321
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Sep 17, 2025
R82148V
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?