• Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech

Concept vs. Production photos

  • Thread starter Thread starter 66Satellite
  • Start date Start date Dec 30, 2003
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
Next
First Prev 2 of 4 Next Last

MrBobMarley

Founding Member
Oct 7, 2002
460
0
16
Ft Myers, FL
Jan 2, 2004
#21
  • Jan 2, 2004
  • #21
Is there something wrong with wanting the fb above over the 05? Must be cause I'm a die-hard classic fan. But the 05 stang is very impressive for a redesign. I'll just be waiting to see how ford and the aftermarket take care of it.
 
M

mk2001c

New Member
Sep 26, 2003
37
0
0
Jan 2, 2004
#22
  • Jan 2, 2004
  • #22
RICKS said:
Also, there's alot more rear overhang on the production car, which probably is to ensure that the trunk serves as more than a glorified duffle-bag.
Click to expand...

That's the one thing that bugs me about the production version - too much rear overhang. Makes it look a little stretched. Trunk space is not the reason I buy Mustangs. Otherwise, I like the looks of the 05.
 

SVTdriver

Founding Member
Sep 2, 2001
3,319
0
0
Seattle Wa
Jan 2, 2004
#23
  • Jan 2, 2004
  • #23
http://forums.bradbarnett.net/uploads/post-7-1072760416.jpg
Is it really all that much overhang?
 

pairofnines

New Member
Jun 8, 2003
80
0
0
Jan 2, 2004
#24
  • Jan 2, 2004
  • #24
SVTdriver said:
http://forums.bradbarnett.net/uploads/post-7-1072760416.jpg
Is it really all that much overhang?
Click to expand...

HA!, Yes, thank you for posting that, I was looking for that, I keep hearing how much overhang and how different the production is from the concept. That proves just how close the production was to the concept. I think this is the first time that a production model was so close to the concept. Rememeber the 63 Mustang? What about the Mach III concept? I'm not directing this towards you SVTdriver, just to all those doubters.


Ahhhh, feels so good to rant every once in a while.
 

SVTdriver

Founding Member
Sep 2, 2001
3,319
0
0
Seattle Wa
Jan 2, 2004
#25
  • Jan 2, 2004
  • #25
That's why I posted it.
 
N

Ned

New Member
Apr 30, 2003
80
0
0
s'land
Jan 2, 2004
#26
  • Jan 2, 2004
  • #26
I think the production version looks pretty similiar to the concept in terms of the lines of the car. The production car looks better with the wheels, the back end is nicer looking in my opinion too.
 
M

mk2001c

New Member
Sep 26, 2003
37
0
0
Jan 3, 2004
#27
  • Jan 3, 2004
  • #27
SVTdriver said:
http://forums.bradbarnett.net/uploads/post-7-1072760416.jpg
Is it really all that much overhang?
Click to expand...

Relatively, the overhang isn't excessive. But it is enough to make the car look not quite right.
 

Venkman

Founding Member
Mar 12, 2001
1,184
0
0
Austin, Tx
Jan 3, 2004
#28
  • Jan 3, 2004
  • #28
oh man, ford screwed up bad. The concept looked amazing and that looks like a total water down....
 

pairofnines

New Member
Jun 8, 2003
80
0
0
Jan 3, 2004
#29
  • Jan 3, 2004
  • #29
Venkman said:
oh man, ford screwed up bad. The concept looked amazing and that looks like a total water down....
Click to expand...


You really can't expect the production to be just like the concept, there are things like cost, practicality, and safety requirements. If you expected the concept, I think you pretty much deserve to be let down. I loved the concept, and I love the production, from what I see, I'm going to very happy to have one of these in my garage. Ford never said, "The production is the concept car." They said it would look similar, and it does.
 

SVTdriver

Founding Member
Sep 2, 2001
3,319
0
0
Seattle Wa
Jan 3, 2004
#30
  • Jan 3, 2004
  • #30
The really sad part is how many people actually believed. That Ford was actually going to build the concept. And never took into account all the factors that made it only a concept.
 

MyStangGT

Member
Jun 21, 2003
77
1
8
Jan 3, 2004
#31
  • Jan 3, 2004
  • #31
Hmmmm.

 

jdstang66

Founding Member
Jul 29, 2002
553
0
0
Jan 3, 2004
#32
  • Jan 3, 2004
  • #32
by the comparison there it sure appears ford didn't drift too far from the 99-03 stangs.
 

jdstang66

Founding Member
Jul 29, 2002
553
0
0
Jan 4, 2004
#33
  • Jan 4, 2004
  • #33
new ones from autoweek.com



 

Attachments

  • 5Mustang29.webp
    65.1 KB · Views: 410
  • 5Mustang01.webp
    30.8 KB · Views: 409

jdstang66

Founding Member
Jul 29, 2002
553
0
0
Jan 4, 2004
#34
  • Jan 4, 2004
  • #34
jdstang66 said:
new ones from autoweek.com
Click to expand...

some more



 

Attachments

  • 5Mustang05.webp
    54.7 KB · Views: 393
  • 5Mustang28.webp
    68.3 KB · Views: 402

ill advised

Member
Apr 29, 2003
656
10
19
West L.A.
Jan 4, 2004
#35
  • Jan 4, 2004
  • #35
I'm not real big on the tiny quarter window, but other than that...man I can't wait to see that thing lowered with some aftermarket wheels.
 

66Satellite

Banned
Feb 6, 2003
649
0
17
Jan 4, 2004
#36
  • Jan 4, 2004
  • #36
this shows what camera angle can do...cars look even closer now.



 

yellow5.0cobra

Founding Member
Jul 25, 2002
2,849
0
0
In the garage, On the floor.
Jan 4, 2004
#37
  • Jan 4, 2004
  • #37
The production model does look SWEET.

I JUST wished the front end would have been a little more aerodynamic.

I doubt they even put this car in the wind tunnel.

I also THINK that little rear window will even pop open... possibility?

Well at least the door doesnt seem to be 6' long like 94-current models.
 

Route666

Active Member
Aug 16, 2003
1,652
6
39
Brisbane, Australia
Jan 4, 2004
#38
  • Jan 4, 2004
  • #38
Oh baby. Nice colour, is that a real photo?
 

mike keirstead

New Member
Aug 6, 2003
1,121
0
0
ROLLING A JOINT
Jan 4, 2004
#39
  • Jan 4, 2004
  • #39
I think they will look sinister with Draglites or Pro stars....skinnies and fatties. Wonder who will be the first to do that. How long do you think before someone has wheeltubs in one....soon i hope.
 

MyStangGT

Member
Jun 21, 2003
77
1
8
Jan 4, 2004
#40
  • Jan 4, 2004
  • #40
Personally I like the quarter window. Reminds me of the early Shelby and I'm sure that was the inspiration for that. The tire to fender clearence is much better looking than the 99-04. They finally put the gas cap on the correct side.

I don't like the front end on the concept or production but the production front looks the better of the two in appearence to me. Nostagia is okay to a point but that just looks like two steps backwards in aero. If they finally put the steering column in the car straight and paid some attention to pedal placements and seat comfort that'll be a plus. Those wheels are BUTT UGLY!

Do you reckon they used a tranny that will shift right? Will the IRS work for everyone? Time will tell so I'm stickin with my 99 GT till it does.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
Next
First Prev 2 of 4 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Resolved 93 Mustang 5.0 - Cranks but does not start
  • dan50
  • Jul 18, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
6
Views
128
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 18, 2026
dan50
For Sale 94 Cobra 408w AOD Project For Sale
  • Labora
  • Oct 11, 2024
  • SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04)
Replies
1
Views
1K
SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04) Apr 7, 2025
Labora
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
For Sale 3-owner 1987 Mustang GT, $18K obro, Lancaster CA
  • Bill Cool
  • Oct 6, 2024
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
4
Views
2K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Oct 13, 2024
nickyb
SN Mustang Magnum T56 swap
  • revhead347
  • May 24, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
15
Views
6K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jun 28, 2026
GearHeadGuy
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?