• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Confused. Ignition. Duraspark II or Pertronix.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Fuzzylogic
  • Start date Start date Feb 18, 2007
F

Fuzzylogic

New Member
May 8, 2005
42
0
0
Albany, OR
Feb 18, 2007
#1
  • Feb 18, 2007
  • #1
Bang for the buck, efficiency, easiest to install, "best" to use. What's the difference between these two and which should I be looking for to go with my Dad's 200ci Mustang?

Thanks - I'm a newbie trying to understand. He brought up Pertronix and wanting to do that, but I saw on Fordsix (a site recommended to me from here) that Duraspark II was the way to go.

Help! And thanks!


Thomas
 
1

10secgoal

Active Member
Dec 1, 2003
2,801
3
49
San Diego
Feb 18, 2007
#2
  • Feb 18, 2007
  • #2
Duraspark isn't as easy to install. But the only way i think. I've seen/had too many petronix burn out.
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Feb 18, 2007
#3
  • Feb 18, 2007
  • #3
I've used a Pertronix for years now with no burnout. If you've got a good distributor now, install the Pertronix or any other conversion module. I've used the Pertronix I & II and a Crane XR-1 and all are reliable. The difference between the I & II units I've noticed is the II unit doesn't develop a mis fire after a "hiccup" backfire thru the carb..
 

dbfarr

Member
Sep 17, 2005
191
0
17
Boise ID
Feb 19, 2007
#4
  • Feb 19, 2007
  • #4
I put my duraspark together for 55$. That included wiring, cap, rotor, fleabay distributor, module, etc. It took a while to get the parts together, but I was bored and patient.

I even made my own bushing to change the advance curve. Mechanical advance is now 22 degrees. Currently running 14 to 36.

Anyway, I had Pertronix one. Changed over to utilize female ignition wires.

With the Duraspark, the idle is better, otherwise, it performs the same as the Pertronix. It is, even if you buy new, cheaper.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

M
1966 289 Electronic Ignition
  • MrStangBoise
  • Jan 18, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
10
Views
2K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jan 23, 2025
Realmongo
J
Progress Thread Family member 1989 GT- Backstory and updates
  • JRC99
  • Apr 19, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
15
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 26, 2025
JRC99
J
Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
46
Views
2K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Yesterday at 9:44 PM
Noobz347
  • Locked
“Doing stuff the wrong way for the right reasons”: A related stupid story.
  • CarMichael Angelo
  • Apr 26, 2020
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 27, 2020
a91what
F
Engine Upgrades?
  • Fargo5.0
  • Jul 23, 2016
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
28
Views
3K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 26, 2016
A5literMan
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?