• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

convert to carb

  • Thread starter Thread starter Opposedodie
  • Start date Start date Nov 7, 2011

Opposedodie

New Member
Jul 31, 2011
121
0
0
Nov 7, 2011
#1
  • Nov 7, 2011
  • #1
What is it going to take to convert to Carb? I have a friend that is having a wiring nightmare, How easy it would be to just Carb his 89 Stang . I know he needs an Intake and Carb set up, But what about the wiring? What will have to be done?
 

betke76

20+ Year Stangneter
Oct 23, 2004
241
9
19
laurel, md.
Nov 7, 2011
#2
  • Nov 7, 2011
  • #2
it would be cheaper,faster to fix, and easier to fix the wiring harness and stay fuel injected
 

jrichker

StangNet's favorite TOOL
In Remembrance. Thank you for your contributions
Mar 10, 2000
27,512
2,811
234
Dublin GA
Nov 7, 2011
#3
  • Nov 7, 2011
  • #3
betke76 said:
it would be cheaper,faster to fix, and easier to fix the wiring harness and stay fuel injected
Click to expand...

He's absolutely right. Don't butcher a perfectly good 5.0 Mustang just because you are electrically challenged...

For free automotive electrical training, see Automotive Training and Resource Site . I have personally reviewed the material and it is very good.

A word of warning on EFI to carb swaps: don’t expect to pass emissions in any state that does comprehensive smog inspections, because it won’t happen. Some states will not title or issue license plates to cars that have been converted from EFI to carb. Be aware that you are violating several Federal laws concerning the removal of pollution control equipment. If you operate the vehicle on public highways and get caught by state or federal law enforcement (doubtful, but possible) you could be subject to fines and imprisonment. You won't get any more power from a carb than you will from EFI.

Some of the motivation of my negative comments about carb to EFI has to do with the quality of electrical workmanship. A lot of the wiring “repairs” that I have seen on the road and in the junkyard looks like road kill. The other part of my negative view stems from people who can’t grasp the operation and tuning of EFI. Carbs have their own set of requirements and some learning is required to get the best performance. Every car is different and each installation needs to be tuned to get the best performance. Putting an “out of the box carb” or one from someone else’s car isn’t the way to success. There is no auto compensation for small variations in carbs like there is for EFI. Just throwing a carb on a car because you won’t bother to learn how EFI works is a poor excuse.
 

LarsD

Founding Member
Jul 2, 2002
2,680
119
123
Texas
Nov 7, 2011
#4
  • Nov 7, 2011
  • #4
betke76 said:
it would be cheaper,faster to fix, and easier to fix the wiring harness and stay fuel injected
Click to expand...

I agree.
 
S

Stranjer

New Member
Nov 7, 2011
1
0
2
Nov 7, 2011
#5
  • Nov 7, 2011
  • #5
Incase you still want to got Carb

EFI to Carburetor Conversion

Gene
 

BlackGT89

Member
Dec 16, 2002
774
8
18
Huntsville, AL
Nov 7, 2011
#6
  • Nov 7, 2011
  • #6
For a street car, stay EFI. Search Ebay for the harness needed, there are several available for a lot less than new carb, new intake, etc. would cost:

http://www.ebay.com/itm/1989-1993-F...pt=Motors_Car_Truck_Parts_Accessories&vxp=mtr
 

ID89GT

10 Year Member
May 26, 2008
1,659
18
49
Spokane Valley, WA
Nov 7, 2011
#7
  • Nov 7, 2011
  • #7
Im all for stayin efi, but that is an awesome write up for doin the conversion haha
 

ID89GT

10 Year Member
May 26, 2008
1,659
18
49
Spokane Valley, WA
Nov 7, 2011
#8
  • Nov 7, 2011
  • #8
As for the wiring, I just pickedup a full body harness out of an 89 GT for 250 dollars, and I got the computer harness, 02 sensor harness, and injector harnessfor 75 shipped to my door.. so it would def be cheaper and a lot easier to just replace the wiring harness that is giving you troubles..
 

Opposedodie

New Member
Jul 31, 2011
121
0
0
Nov 8, 2011
#9
  • Nov 8, 2011
  • #9
We have 3 harnesses and this weekend we are going to take the Ecu harness out of my Stang and build one out of the 3 we have ... or try to ... I have been trying to get this guy up and running , but there is no parts in this part of Idaho,,,
 
W

wicked02

New Member
Jan 27, 2011
17
0
1
Nov 8, 2011
#10
  • Nov 8, 2011
  • #10
i went carbed and love it,but the again i like old school.That's just my 2 cents
 

Stever89

5 Year Member
Dec 14, 2009
536
9
39
Biloxi, MS
Nov 8, 2011
#11
  • Nov 8, 2011
  • #11
jrichker said:
He's absolutely right. Don't butcher a perfectly good 5.0 Mustang just because you are electrically challenged...
Click to expand...

Counterproductive.
 

ID89GT

10 Year Member
May 26, 2008
1,659
18
49
Spokane Valley, WA
Nov 8, 2011
#12
  • Nov 8, 2011
  • #12
Look online, if the ecu harness is all you need, you should be able to find one pretty easy
 

88-378

Member
Aug 10, 2007
14
2
16
Alpharetta, GA
Nov 8, 2011
#13
  • Nov 8, 2011
  • #13
I was toying about going carb, but chose in the end not to. The way i figure it is, either way it will have to be professionally tuned. The tuning systems are expensive and I am not going to waste a good motor trying to do it without a dyno. I do wish there was an affordable, easy efi software to use.
 

Opposedodie

New Member
Jul 31, 2011
121
0
0
Nov 9, 2011
#14
  • Nov 9, 2011
  • #14
We have 3 ECU harnesses and one of them the only difference is a green connector by the ECU mine has a grey one.. we are going to trace wires and see if we can make one this weekend.. We have another one with the grey connector but it is missing some other things..
 
3

331strokerstang

New Member
Jan 20, 2009
15
0
0
Nov 9, 2011
#15
  • Nov 9, 2011
  • #15
i agree with going carb bc its simpler cheaper and easier to fix, but all you need is intake carb 85 mustang 5.0ho carb distributor, and a duraspark box, and low pressure fuel pump its very simple, just pull the ecu and complete harness out, i went carb and never go back, you can do whatever you want to without a tune or anything, also you will need to drop your tank and pull out the intank pump, if your near va pm me for exact details, my engine bay looks so much cleaner now, but thats just my two cents as well.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

C
Bored with my 73
  • Curtis Harper
  • Apr 14, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
169
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Apr 23, 2026
RaggedGT
6
Help Me Build a 289
  • 66Stang1
  • Sep 18, 2025
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Replies
6
Views
319
Classic Mustang Specific Tech Sep 18, 2025
Noobz347
D
Fuel Erratic Fuel Pressure 1985 GT
  • DienstXIV
  • Jan 14, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
16
Views
627
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jan 16, 2026
AeroCoupe
H
Holley Carb Tuning Help
  • hassler
  • Oct 25, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
6
Views
292
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 29, 2025
85GTStangGuy
N
Edelbrock 1405 Setup
  • nathantaylor200
  • Nov 4, 2025
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Replies
3
Views
200
Classic Mustang Specific Tech Nov 5, 2025
nathantaylor200
N
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?