• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

Couple Suspension questions

  • Thread starter Thread starter scolon
  • Start date Start date Aug 21, 2007
S

scolon

New Member
Jul 23, 2007
16
0
0
Aug 21, 2007
#1
  • Aug 21, 2007
  • #1
I have a 95 Gt Vert.. What is the difference in the eibach springs..
I see them lsted as for Convert and also just standard coupe?
Whats consiquence of buying ones for a coupe instead? (since ther is a set on ebay really cheap)

Next question similar to above.. Tripple guage pillar... Is there a special part number for a convertible or should i be able to just buy a standar tripple pillar?
 

94CobraPace

Founding Member
Aug 30, 2000
907
1
0
Houston, Tx.
Aug 22, 2007
#2
  • Aug 22, 2007
  • #2
Not sure of the exact differences between the vert and coupe springs, but I have the coupe springs on my vert. Better ride than the Bullit springs.
They don't make a 3 gauge pod for the verts, not the full length ones. The coupes are different than verts. You can get the double ones then add a single?
 

toyman

10 Year Member
Jul 19, 2007
1,944
54
79
Vernon BC
Aug 22, 2007
#3
  • Aug 22, 2007
  • #3
scolon said:
I have a 95 Gt Vert.. What is the difference in the eibach springs..
I see them lsted as for Convert and also just standard coupe?
Whats consiquence of buying ones for a coupe instead? (since ther is a set on ebay really cheap)

Next question similar to above.. Tripple guage pillar... Is there a special part number for a convertible or should i be able to just buy a standar tripple pillar?
Click to expand...
The springs may not matter. When I purchased the FRPP system it didn't matter whether it was a coupe or a convertible. I had asked because I had also noticed that certain brands were making a distinction.

I have been told unequivocately that the pillar pods for a coupe are not interchangable with a convertible. If you discover otherwise please let me know.
 
B

baglock1

The Bartender
Founding Member
Aug 25, 2001
6,612
1
78
Space Coast, FL
Sep 2, 2007
#4
  • Sep 2, 2007
  • #4
Convertibles are heavier cars requiring higher rate springs for the same increase in perceived rate.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

T
Convertible A-pillar weatherstrip issues
  • thiefofcheese
  • Oct 24, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
329
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Nov 20, 2025
AeroCoupe
S
Upgrade Advice on an 89 GT Convertible NJ
  • SteakDad
  • Apr 17, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
10
Views
856
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 18, 2025
limp
2
Suspension SetUp
  • 23Newb
  • Jul 29, 2023
  • 2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
50
Views
6K
2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech Sep 4, 2023
23Newb
2
K
Suspension troubleshooting - where to begin
  • KansasPaul
  • Sep 30, 2023
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
14
Views
3K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 2, 2023
Warhorse Racing
Kind of stiff feel in front suspension
  • from6to8
  • Mar 29, 2023
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
3
Views
1K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Mar 30, 2023
from6to8
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?