• Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-

'Cuda concept

  • Thread starter Thread starter 226embarcadero
  • Start date Start date Mar 21, 2008

226embarcadero

New Member
Oct 13, 2007
10
0
0
San Francisco, CA
Mar 21, 2008
#1
  • Mar 21, 2008
  • #1
Saw this recently and think it looks pretty cool.

But i personally don't think there's a chance in hell it will make it into production.

It's basically the challenger with different front and rear fascias.

http://www.planetchallenger.com/concept-news/dodge-challenger-barracuda-concept-071030.html
 

DarkFireGT

Playing with my wife's really makes me want one.
10 Year Member
May 23, 2004
692
10
89
East Moline, IL
Mar 21, 2008
#2
  • Mar 21, 2008
  • #2
I doubt it will happen also. That said, aftermarket will probably make similar parts available. Here's a version that Doug "Burningman" Schramm created that is being built by a company, and he's planning on building one for himself, too.
 

226embarcadero

New Member
Oct 13, 2007
10
0
0
San Francisco, CA
Mar 21, 2008
#3
  • Mar 21, 2008
  • #3
That is interesting.

I'm guessing the retro "musclecars" might have reached their saturation limit. Esp with gas getting so expensive.

I kind of have a feeling that the Challenger and Camaro will both be limited run productions (maybe 3 or 4 years... like the GTO was recently). Especially given their high price tags.

But Mustang I think will continue to go on... since they are very affordable.
 

DarkFireGT

Playing with my wife's really makes me want one.
10 Year Member
May 23, 2004
692
10
89
East Moline, IL
Mar 21, 2008
#4
  • Mar 21, 2008
  • #4
Not to mention the fact that Chevy is going to be pricing the Camaro similarly to the Challenger. They always try to compare their horsepower and features to the GT, but price it like the GT500.

I honestly don't think the gas crunch will do much for the Mustang, besides giving us an optional turbo or twin turbo V6. The V8 is here to stay. And you're right. The pony car winner will again be the Mustang. Just judging by the information that's already known, the pony car battle is already won. Pony cars are supposed to be affordable by the blue collared worker. $38K+ is not affordable by the blue collared worker.
 

226embarcadero

New Member
Oct 13, 2007
10
0
0
San Francisco, CA
Mar 21, 2008
#5
  • Mar 21, 2008
  • #5
You are right on point.
 
T

The Fang

Member
Sep 11, 2005
602
0
16
Tallahassee Fl
Mar 21, 2008
#6
  • Mar 21, 2008
  • #6
They need to put out some more muscle cars. so a cuda would be nice, I am bout sick of all the pimp chargers and 300's out there. chevy would make a killing with a v6 camaro IMO.
 

226embarcadero

New Member
Oct 13, 2007
10
0
0
San Francisco, CA
Mar 21, 2008
#7
  • Mar 21, 2008
  • #7
Heck, yes! Chevy would instantly become a major player if they offered a V6 Camaro that was affordable.

Instead, they will go the GTO-Challenger-Thunderbird route and set up a short term run for a bunch of rich yuppies to throw money at them for a while and then get out of the game.

When you compare that to the intent of Chev-Ford-Dodge back in the 60s, it's blasphemous. Back then, the Mustangs, Camaros and Challengers (not to mention other muscle) were priced for regular working Americans. They were affordable and they were not economic status items.

Now, Dodge and Chevy are taking the high road and literally cashing in on the musclecar trend of the moment. Their vision is very short-term capital gain, while Ford has (and has always had) longevity in mind with the Mustang.

It won't happen... but I really wish the Camaro and Challenger were massive failures so Chevy and Dodge would have to pay for making such stupid decisions.
 

bigcat

start with the upper hole, and if more traction is
May 1, 2005
3,015
1
79
7200 feet
Mar 21, 2008
#8
  • Mar 21, 2008
  • #8
did you guys hear that the camaro is getting a turbo 4 cylinder and a V6???

wtf is chevy thinking??
 
S

stanmckinney

10 Year Member
Mar 30, 2005
1,188
5
49
Mar 21, 2008
#9
  • Mar 21, 2008
  • #9
I have a V8 Mustang and love it. But it is the 6 cylinder that has kept the car alive. Remember that the next time you want to knock someone who has one.
 

boardroomjimmy

New Member
Jan 31, 2008
4
0
0
Mar 21, 2008
#10
  • Mar 21, 2008
  • #10
That 'cuda looks awesome, I must say I'm not all that thrilled with the initial pics of the camaro.(camaro5.com) The lines seem muted and the proportions look off. At this point I'd say I'll be keeping the c6. This should get interesting in the next year, hope ford knows what they are doing with the mustang re-body....
 
H

Hoboattacker

New Member
Sep 7, 2005
542
0
0
Baton Rouge (LSU) / Houston, TX
Mar 22, 2008
#11
  • Mar 22, 2008
  • #11
stanmckinney said:
I have a V8 Mustang and love it. But it is the 6 cylinder that has kept the car alive. Remember that the next time you want to knock someone who has one.
Click to expand...

Couldn't have said it better myself.
 

226embarcadero

New Member
Oct 13, 2007
10
0
0
San Francisco, CA
Mar 22, 2008
#12
  • Mar 22, 2008
  • #12
bigcat said:
did you guys hear that the camaro is getting a turbo 4 cylinder and a V6???

wtf is chevy thinking??
Click to expand...

If that is true, they are thinking smart.
 

226embarcadero

New Member
Oct 13, 2007
10
0
0
San Francisco, CA
Mar 22, 2008
#13
  • Mar 22, 2008
  • #13
stanmckinney said:
I have a V8 Mustang and love it. But it is the 6 cylinder that has kept the car alive. Remember that the next time you want to knock someone who has one.
Click to expand...

Truer words have never been spoken.

The GT owes its continuing life to the V6. Otherwise, the pony would have been dead long ago.
 

Sparty92

Member
Jul 30, 2007
430
5
19
Detroit Burbs
Mar 22, 2008
#14
  • Mar 22, 2008
  • #14
226embarcadero said:
If that is true, they are thinking smart.
Click to expand...


It's probably the Solstice/Sky turbo motor...which makes 260hp(?) right now? Tweak that a bit and you're at 300....which is what we have now (stock).

Might not rumble like a muscle car should, but it might move out pretty quick, and sip gas along the way.
 

DarkFireGT

Playing with my wife's really makes me want one.
10 Year Member
May 23, 2004
692
10
89
East Moline, IL
Mar 22, 2008
#15
  • Mar 22, 2008
  • #15
When the car is in excess of 4000lbs, 300HP isn't going to do much. Look at the Magnum/Charger R/T. They have more HP than that and they're still slugs compared to the S197. 300HP and 4000lbs is not going to go very fast.
 

boardroomjimmy

New Member
Jan 31, 2008
4
0
0
Mar 22, 2008
#16
  • Mar 22, 2008
  • #16
Weight really is the killer these days, imagine a rs camaro, turbo 4cyl, stripped down to 3300lbs. at 300hp, it would perform very well. How much does that little ecotech 4 weigh? Personally I'm looking foreward to a ss427 to fight with the KR.
 
B

BLKNED

Member
Jan 27, 2008
67
1
9
Mar 23, 2008
#17
  • Mar 23, 2008
  • #17
There are supposed to be multiple trim levels for the Camaro. Starting with the base v-6 and rumor is two or even three different v-8's The v-6 is supposed to be around $20k and a base model v-8 around $25k with the top of the line car arond $40k+. They are acctually trying to mimic for as far as trim levels and pricing.
 

DarkFireGT

Playing with my wife's really makes me want one.
10 Year Member
May 23, 2004
692
10
89
East Moline, IL
Mar 23, 2008
#18
  • Mar 23, 2008
  • #18
BLKNED said:
There are supposed to be multiple trim levels for the Camaro. Starting with the base v-6 and rumor is two or even three different v-8's The v-6 is supposed to be around $20k and a base model v-8 around $25k with the top of the line car arond $40k+. They are acctually trying to mimic for as far as trim levels and pricing.
Click to expand...

According to Bob Lutz, they are "above the Mustang" and are not going to try to compete in price, citing a better interior and suspension.

http://www.planetcamaro.com/general-news/chevrolet-camaro-to-have-v6-and-a-turbo-i4-080320.html
 

226embarcadero

New Member
Oct 13, 2007
10
0
0
San Francisco, CA
Mar 24, 2008
#19
  • Mar 24, 2008
  • #19
Yes I concur with DarkFire...

Chevrolet and Chrysler have each in the past expressed frustration with trying to get the cost of producing their respective vehicles down to the Mustang's level. Therefore, they will both overprice.

Dodge has already done this by charging way too much for the Challenger, which will be a short-run vehicle. They are going to try and scoop up a lot of money in a short period of time... rather than investing in a long-term strategy like Ford has.

Chevrolet will go Dodge's route A) because there is already so much buzz surrounding the Camaro that they figure people will pay thru the nose to get one and B) because the geniuses at GM cannot figure out how to make an acceptable profit on a $21,000 car.

Therefore, I think the Camaro will also be short-run. Probably 3 or 4 years and Chev will dump it again and count their cash.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
46
Views
3K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jul 16, 2026
Noobz347
Fox Build ideas for the 'Hudson Heap' (87 GT)
  • MadSquirrelTech
  • Sep 19, 2023
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 27, 2023
MadSquirrelTech
J
Progress Thread Family member 1989 GT- Backstory and updates
  • JRC99
  • Apr 19, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
15
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 26, 2025
JRC99
J
SN Mustang Magnum T56 swap
  • revhead347
  • May 24, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
15
Views
6K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jun 28, 2026
GearHeadGuy
Stiffer front springs writeup from the old .net site
  • LILCBRA
  • Oct 24, 2022
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Replies
1
Views
1K
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech Oct 29, 2022
Enzio
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?