• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

dad has worries about UD pullies

  • Thread starter Thread starter seany425
  • Start date Start date Oct 3, 2004
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
First Prev 2 of 3 Next Last

trinity_gt

10 Year Member
Jan 31, 2003
3,125
81
99
Canada
Oct 3, 2004
#21
  • Oct 3, 2004
  • #21
Gearbanger 101 said:
......and causing the oil pump gear to fail!?! WTF .....where do some of you get these ideas?
Click to expand...

From research and basic knowledge of engine function.

Are you one of those that erroneously calls the harmonic damper on the 4.6 a "balancer"? Do you understand the concept of torsional vibration in a crankshaft and the need to dampen it? Do you understand the concept of harmonics and resonance? Do you know where the oil pump drive gear is, in the engine, relation to the harmonic damper?

And even though I disagree with him calling it a "balancer", this is what Sean Hyland says in his book "How to Build Max Performance 4.6-litre Ford Engines":

"The harmonic balancer is essential in providing a trouble-free service life for the crankshaft. The oil pump failures on engines using stock oil pumps can be attributed to a harmonic problem that manifests itself by breaking the oil pump gears.

The first instances of oil pump failure we encountered were the result of trying a small crankshaft flange instead of a balancer. There also seems to be increased instances of oil pump failure when some brands of underdrive pulley kits are used. I believe this is due to inadequate damping with the reduced diameter harmonic damper provided. SHM recently developed an underdrive harmonic balancer that retains 92% of the original mass." - pg 19

I now await proof from you that torsional vibration in the crank cannot cause oil pump failure on these motors.
 

reenmachine

20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 27, 2004
1,258
2
38
Montrose, CA
Oct 3, 2004
#22
  • Oct 3, 2004
  • #22
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Oct 3, 2004
#23
  • Oct 3, 2004
  • #23
trinity_gt said:
From research and basic knowledge of engine function.

Are you one of those that erroneously calls the harmonic damper on the 4.6 a "balancer"? Do you understand the concept of torsional vibration in a crankshaft and the need to dampen it? Do you understand the concept of harmonics and resonance? Do you know where the oil pump drive gear is, in the engine, relation to the harmonic damper?

And even though I disagree with him calling it a "balancer", this is what Sean Hyland says in his book "How to Build Max Performance 4.6-litre Ford Engines":

"The harmonic balancer is essential in providing a trouble-free service life for the crankshaft. The oil pump failures on engines using stock oil pumps can be attributed to a harmonic problem that manifests itself by breaking the oil pump gears.

The first instances of oil pump failure we encountered were the result of trying a small crankshaft flange instead of a balancer. There also seems to be increased instances of oil pump failure when some brands of underdrive pulley kits are used. I believe this is due to inadequate damping with the reduced diameter harmonic damper provided. SHM recently developed an underdrive harmonic balancer that retains 92% of the original mass." - pg 19

I now await proof from you that torsional vibration in the crank cannot cause oil pump failure on these motors.
Click to expand...
Yes, I’m aware that the modular engines are internally balanced and to a certain extent I agree with you. But in the same instance the cases being referred to are stock engines being spun past their normal parameters with either the addition of excessive horsepower or RPM. I guess if you bought a lowball cheap set of piggy back U/D pulleys, then engine harmonics might be increased to a certain extent that over a looooong period of time could contribute to some form of driveline failure, but for your average Joe just looking to kick up another 100hp out of his 4.6L, it never seems to be a problem.

That being said, it’s interesting that Sean Hyland Mororsports claims to have revolutionized the theory of driveline harmonics by developing a balancer that magically cures this issue. A more accurate description of the company that is SHM brings the words “Hack Artists” to mind. I live not more than about 3 1/2hrs from them and they’ve screwed up more mod motors than every other specialty company combined. He’s probably one of the last people I’d be taking advice from in regards to the understanding of Fords line of Modular engines. It’s a good theory, and in extreme cases a correct one, but for every one person who says adding a set of U/D pulleys screwed their motor, I’ll show you 50 that have gone 100,000+ without so much as a hiccup!

reenmachine said:
Click to expand...
Hardly Newbie....and I recal you being one of the first ones to pipe up about it yourself. Back up that statement!
 

reenmachine

20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 27, 2004
1,258
2
38
Montrose, CA
Oct 3, 2004
#24
  • Oct 3, 2004
  • #24
OK, here's the backup you requested...

Hardly Newbie....and I recal you being one of the first ones to pipe up about it yourself. Back up that statement!
Click to expand...

Yes, indeed! What I said was:

Gotta love it when someone makes a statement like that with no explanation...
Click to expand...

...which I stand by entirely. Popping in, making an alarmist broad statement:

dont do it underdrive pullies cause the oil pump gear to fail!
Click to expand...

...and offering no explanation is totally bogus.

Regardless of whatever reputation SHM may have, these are valid points about dampers. You are also, in my opinion, correct in observing that this problem generally occurs in engines that have been modified to run way outside of factory parameters.

Go to any forum for any type of car and you will see this same topic absolutely beaten to death.

These potentially harmful harmonic vibrations, by definition, occur at certain discrete RPM ranges (frequencies) and the more time spent dwelling at those frequencies, the more effect there is. For example, I've seen photos of catastrophic crankshaft failure on a small block Ford due to harmonic damper removal, but this was in an airplane in which one drones on for hours at the same RPM, which happened to be at or near a harmonic frequency in that poor sucker's engine.

In most automotive applications, there is enough variance in RPM (normal driving) that one quickly passes through these harmonic ranges without ill effect. However, if, for example, you do mainly highway driving at a set RPM for long periods of time you may want to consider these issues more carefully.
 

reenmachine

20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 27, 2004
1,258
2
38
Montrose, CA
Oct 3, 2004
#25
  • Oct 3, 2004
  • #25
if you're bored...

If you've got some time to burn, check out this thread:

http://www.my350z.com/forum/showthread.php?s=&threadid=30921

When the 350Z parts started to come out, there was a months-long debate over this very issue, mostly between a couple of people who knew what they were talking about and a million who were just repeating crap they had heard. It was rather entertaining, at times lapsing into discussions of religion and philosophy as they relate to harmonic dampers.
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Oct 3, 2004
#26
  • Oct 3, 2004
  • #26
 

Mr GT 02

New Member
Apr 8, 2004
548
0
0
Peabody, MA
Oct 3, 2004
#27
  • Oct 3, 2004
  • #27
I'm Surprised no one has mentioned the Steeda Timing Adjuster.

If your gonna get the Steeda Pullies. Then u SHOULD get the Timing adjuster also. I heard that it Complimets the pullies if u set the timing to 14* u should feel even better gains. knocking off some 2 tenths of a second.

Am I right?
 

NiteRydaGT

New Member
Feb 28, 2004
295
0
0
Long Island, NY
Oct 3, 2004
#28
  • Oct 3, 2004
  • #28
Mr GT 02 said:
I'm Surprised no one has mentioned the Steeda Timing Adjuster.

If your gonna get the Steeda Pullies. Then u SHOULD get the Timing adjuster also. I heard that it Complimets the pullies if u set the timing to 14* u should feel even better gains. knocking off some 2 tenths of a second.

Am I right?
Click to expand...
That's true that they do compliment each other but you can get the same effects of the timing adjuster from a custom tune or chip. I have heard that the t/a will sometimes bounce off the timing point originally set.
 
C

CottonBurnerz

Banned
May 10, 2003
1,554
0
0
Drink and Drive = Teh Lose
Oct 3, 2004
#29
  • Oct 3, 2004
  • #29
I also asked my dad about most of my mods that i've installed in the car. He think that my car is already fast and doesn't need to be modify. He thinks everything is a waste. So, I just said screw it and ordered the parts. Once the parts came, he looks happy and gladly helped me install them...

I have no problem with the u/d pullies so far. EXCEPT for that one time after I installed it. I forgot to plug back in the alternator charger wire to the battery... lol. I made a thread about it on here somewhere a while back :shy:
 
X

XStanger

Founding Member
Sep 1, 2002
383
0
16
Oct 3, 2004
#30
  • Oct 3, 2004
  • #30
I live here in Vegas and most of the guys out here do not recommend the pulley's either. They say that with the extreme heat of the summer, the pulley's turn the water pump too slow at low rpm's which could cause overheating issues.
 

tomustang

Psychotic Member
Founding Member
Jun 8, 2000
3,434
2
78
McLean Hospital
Oct 4, 2004
#31
  • Oct 4, 2004
  • #31
blkhorse said:
just tell your dad you need 4.10's to spin the motor faster
Click to expand...

haha, i second the motion.
 

FallenPhoenix

New Member
Nov 22, 2003
911
0
0
Odessa Tx
Oct 4, 2004
#32
  • Oct 4, 2004
  • #32
my friend has a set on his '03 for a year at least with no problems. This is in the middle of West Texas too.
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Oct 4, 2004
#33
  • Oct 4, 2004
  • #33
CottonBurnerz said:
I also asked my dad about most of my mods that i've installed in the car. He think that my car is already fast and doesn't need to be modify. He thinks everything is a waste. So, I just said screw it and ordered the parts. Once the parts came, he looks happy and gladly helped me install them...
Click to expand...
Hahaha, that's funny. When I was younger my dad used to do the same thing. I used to get excuses like, "Oh, so and so said it will blow your engine up", or "I was told by so and so that it you've got any sort of modifications the insurance company won't cover you if you're in an accident". Meanwhile, it was just because dad knew that I'm be soaking up his garage for the next week installing it and he was trying to keep me out.

As a matter of fact, he tried to give the the insurance excuse just the other day when I told him I was springing for a Blower.
 
R

raph130

Founding Member
Mar 20, 2002
517
0
0
Nov 26, 2004
#34
  • Nov 26, 2004
  • #34
*
 

Go HoTO!

New Member
Apr 11, 2004
602
0
0
Mountaintop, PA
Nov 26, 2004
#35
  • Nov 26, 2004
  • #35
NiteRydaGT said:
I've had mine on for months. No charging problems, no cooling problems. Isn't it true that since the accessories aren't pulling as hard with the u/d pullies on it extends the life of the water pump? I thought I read that somewhere.
Click to expand...

That's what we call in the sales world...."a stretch".
 

Go HoTO!

New Member
Apr 11, 2004
602
0
0
Mountaintop, PA
Nov 26, 2004
#36
  • Nov 26, 2004
  • #36
Back to your original questions:

I think your father has some good reasons for concerns. If UDP's really did that much, I think he would be completely justified. But, they don't. With only 5 - 10 rwhp gains at the most, this is why there are so few complaints.

I have them on my car and have only noticed the steering to be tighter at or near idle speeds. You will never feel 5 - 10 rwhp with the SOTP, so don't expect much. Your wallet will feel them more than your arse.
 

Seraphitia102

will post boobie pics for a supercharger
Oct 11, 2004
737
1
16
California
Nov 26, 2004
#37
  • Nov 26, 2004
  • #37
i believe (in most cases) that stock cars last the longest.
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Nov 26, 2004
#38
  • Nov 26, 2004
  • #38
raph130 said:
wtf? the crank has nothing to do with the oil pump. the distributer is turned by the cam which in turn spins the oil pump. simple as that. the damper absorbs vibration and balances the motor. ud pulley does nothing but steal less power from the crank since the diameter is smaller.
Click to expand...
Ummmm, wrong motor dude.....we're talking 4.6's here.
 
R

raph130

Founding Member
Mar 20, 2002
517
0
0
Nov 26, 2004
#39
  • Nov 26, 2004
  • #39
*
 

trinity_gt

10 Year Member
Jan 31, 2003
3,125
81
99
Canada
Nov 26, 2004
#40
  • Nov 26, 2004
  • #40
raph130 said:
4.6, 5.0, 5.7, 1345.0, it makes no difference. a pulley wont "harm" and "break" stuff in your engine.
Click to expand...

Oh man...

The oil pump in the modular motor is located on the crank snout.



That hole in the middle slips over the crank snout and those little teeth in the middle engage mating parts on the crankshaft itself driving the pump gears within. On the crank snout...again. As such, the drive gear is in direct contact with the snout and subject to all the vibration and harmonics the snout sees.

Unless you're at least familiar with crankshaft torsional vibration and why it is that Ford builds every modular motor with a specifically engineered torsional vibration damper as part of the crank pulley, I respectfully suggest you not inject misleading nonsense into a thread like this. Jeez...the Mustang mod motors don't even have a "distributer {which} is turned by the cam which in turn spins the oil pump"
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
First Prev 2 of 3 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

H
Ongoing Battle With Hydraulic Lifters
  • hailer06
  • Jun 8, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
271
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 9, 2026
Noobz347
J
Switched to e85 on the 3v and now it won't run right.
  • jcowdough
  • Aug 24, 2025
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
160
2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk- Aug 24, 2025
Noobz347
O
Good all around perfornace-ish tires?
  • optionizerSS
  • Jan 25, 2026
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
327
2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk- Jun 15, 2026
TPony
B
2001 roush stage 3 - sat for 5 years
  • Brando_05
  • Aug 26, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
253
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Aug 26, 2025
Brando_05
B
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 1994 Cobra Supercharger install
  • from6to8
  • Sep 25, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 20 21 22
Replies
420
Views
9K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?