tylers65 said:I camp at the base of Mt Rainier very regularly and do in fact crap in a hole and wipe with what you I can.
Just have to watch for the nettles![]()
![]()
Yea, but you don't do it every day.
Like you, I have a Lincoln LS for my daily driver. We are fortunate to be able to afford 2 cars. But if I could keep only 1 car, it's no contest, my Mustang would be gone in an instant and I'd keep the LS. Most Mustang customers are buying one as their only car. The lack of refinement and creature comforts is driving those consumers to Asian brand competition.
That's sort of the point of this thread.
The Mustang is missing creature comforts which is limiting it's sales to the average consumer who would use their Mustang as a daily driver. (see my thread on 4th consecutive month of lackluster 05 Mustang sales).
The bar is constantly moving. What was acceptable 5 years ago may be a "I won't buy a Mustang if it doesn't have it" decision today.
Don't give me any arguments about Mustangs being a performance car and none of these creature comforts are needed. If it wasn't for the 60% of Mustang sales to "average" consumers, there would be NO Mustangs for 40% who are gearheads. It has always been that way from the day the Mustang was introduced in 1964. Sales of softer Mustangs to the average consumer is what has kept the Mustang in production for 41 years.
( Now aint that sumptin') They get most of their profit money from their finance company and what they earn on cars is just a drop in the bucket.
I'm surprised someone would start a thread just mentioning a small detail that he wished could be changed (not DEMANDING it) and it would turn into bashing of anyone wishing to change the Mustang.