• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

decided on mac shorties but which finish?

  • Thread starter Thread starter FiveO
  • Start date Start date May 18, 2004

FiveO

Founding Member
Jan 28, 2001
1,146
0
0
NJ
May 18, 2004
#1
  • May 18, 2004
  • #1
1 5/8 HTS coated or the 1 5/8 Industrial plated...both are the same price at www.macperformance.com

i'll assume the industrial is better...
 

ECU5.0

Banned
Jan 10, 2004
1,803
1
0
raleigh, nc
May 18, 2004
#2
  • May 18, 2004
  • #2
id go with ceramic. if you want something really good...buy them and send them off to get jethot coated...it lasts forever and is 10 times better than anything else
 

Ranchero5.0

The Voice of Reason
Jan 1, 1999
5,306
0
76
Hagerstown MD
May 18, 2004
#3
  • May 18, 2004
  • #3
You are making a big mistake... Form experience, get the BBK 1515's. They bolt in easier, look better and last longer. The MAC quality sucks, they will not bolt back on the head after being taken off and their ceramic flakes off like cheap paint.

Jamie
 

89MustangGX

I have nothing productive to add!
Jul 3, 2001
10,262
1
0
Mill Creek, WA
May 18, 2004
#4
  • May 18, 2004
  • #4
Ranchero5.0 said:
The MAC quality sucks, they will not bolt back on the head after being taken off and their ceramic flakes off like cheap paint.
Click to expand...

I agree 100%.
 

88stangmangt

Active Member
Nov 25, 2003
2,332
1
48
Stafford,VA
May 18, 2004
#5
  • May 18, 2004
  • #5
ya bbk uses a one peace flange which wont warp from the heat.
 

cardudeusa

Founding Member
Oct 22, 2002
1,744
5
48
Home of the Florida Gators!
May 18, 2004
#6
  • May 18, 2004
  • #6
Ranchero5.0 said:
The MAC quality sucks, they will not bolt back on the head after being taken off and their ceramic flakes off like cheap paint.

Jamie
Click to expand...

I just had my mac lt's off for a head change. They were on for about a year, and the flanges lined up perfect. Not that I think they are quality headers, just saying that I didn't have that problem.
 

04sleeper

Founding Member
Jun 22, 2002
2,674
14
89
Dallas, TX
May 18, 2004
#7
  • May 18, 2004
  • #7
Long Tubes line up easier because the tubes move easier. (longer tubes) Shorties are a pain! I wouldn't even get BBK's. Even though they are great quality, (light years ahead of MAC), they are mild steel with "Their Own" ceramic coating. I would get the FRPP Ceramic's. They are 409 Stainless Steel with "Jet Hot's" "Sterling" finish. They also come with a lifetime warranty on the coating and header from Jet Hot.
 

FiveO

Founding Member
Jan 28, 2001
1,146
0
0
NJ
May 18, 2004
#8
  • May 18, 2004
  • #8
well the reason i wanted to go with mac is because i don't want a wack dipstick which usually happens with the 1 peace flanges (im assuming 1piece flange means that metal piece that runs acrossed the headers). but if i should get that 1 piece flange, then i'm going with the cheap ass flowtech cause i am not worried about finish really. just need some headers with studs lol. cause i gotta cut my stock studs off.
 

89MustangGX

I have nothing productive to add!
Jul 3, 2001
10,262
1
0
Mill Creek, WA
May 19, 2004
#9
  • May 19, 2004
  • #9
I've never had a dipstick problem with aftermarket headers -- I usually just bend the tabs a little and stick them under one of the header bolts.
 
B

Bigstang1

Founding Member
Aug 28, 2002
415
0
16
Massachusettes
May 19, 2004
#10
  • May 19, 2004
  • #10
but if i should get that 1 piece flange, then i'm going with the cheap ass flowtech cause i am not worried about finish really. just need some headers with studs lol. cause i gotta cut my stock studs off.
Click to expand...

I got the flowtech 1 5/8 shorties for the same reason u want em. For the money i paid i have to say that hey fit very well and other than the crappy black coating turning white from hea i havnt had a problem. My dipstick is messed up now tho.
 
9

91StangLX

New Member
Mar 26, 2004
95
0
0
May 19, 2004
#11
  • May 19, 2004
  • #11
Ranchero5.0 said:
You are making a big mistake... Form experience, get the BBK 1515's. They bolt in easier, look better and last longer. The MAC quality sucks, they will not bolt back on the head after being taken off and their ceramic flakes off like cheap paint.

Jamie
Click to expand...

I have do disagree with you I have the MAC unequal length shorties HTS coated and they installed without any problem and they look as good today as the day I installed them over a year ago. Now I had the BBK shorties and they would not seal up to the heads. I returned them and I got another pair. This set sealed up was a pain to install and after about a month the finish started peeling. I yanked them and installed the MACs and have had no problem.
 

Mike86Stang

Advanced Member
Apr 11, 2000
10,296
0
77
Red Lion, PA
May 19, 2004
#12
  • May 19, 2004
  • #12
Well as you know I have the chrome ones & the HTS coated ones ussually a pry bar will make them go on fine lol...I mean after they've been on there awhile but knowing FiveO like I do I don't think he's going to want to take them off again anytime soon
 

Michael Yount

Mustang Master
Apr 10, 2002
9,039
6
79
Charlotte, NC
May 19, 2004
#13
  • May 19, 2004
  • #13
Five0 - my Ford Racing shorties - with a one piece flange - fit the stock dipstick location with no problems. The quality is superb, stainless steel construction.

There is no question that high quality carefully applied ceramic coatings are the best. Nothing else even comes close. They're virtually indestructible. They not only protect the header material, they are incredible insulators - reducing under-hood heat and allowing that heat to remain in the exhaust flow which helps flow. There are some companies that have great reputations - JetHot is one of them. Not the cheapest, but the quality is unsurpassed. There are many others out there - just do some research. I had a company local to Knoxville do mine -very happy with the results.

There's a lot that goes into the process - cleaning/cooking to degrease; blasting to gray metal inside and out; spray coating and baking the coating; buffing the exterior.

If it were me I'd get BBK (with single piece flange; they make individual flanged units too I believe) or Ford Racing shorties (simply too many 'bad' posts on the Mac's). I'd get them either in stainless, non-coated or with the cheap black paint they put on them. After I test fit them, I'd send them out to be ceramic coated. You're probably safe buying ceramic coated shorties (JetHot coats Ford Racing's); with long tubes, I think the test fit is important as sometimes a tube has to be "adjusted" (read - beat to hell and back with a hammer) to fit. You want that done before you coat them.

Edit - I would not do chrome (I think that's industrial 'plating'). I've never seen a set that didn't blue terribly, and because of the chemical plating process, it's more difficult for the ceramic coater to get the chrome off before they coat. And it must come off before they coat.
 

QDRHRSE

New Member
Dec 31, 2002
1,590
0
0
Palmdale, CA
May 19, 2004
#14
  • May 19, 2004
  • #14
I usually by Mac because they are cheap. They're not terrible, just not as good as a lot of other brands. I don't see a whole lot of quality difference between Mac and BBK. Every set of HTS coated Mac headers that I have ever had eventually starts to lose the coating. Every single set set of Industrial plated headers eventually start to rust. I still use them. From a performance standpoint I think that the HTS coating is the way to go but personally I always try to get the industrial plated ones. The industrial plating is easier to keep clean and seems to last longer.
 

Michael Yount

Mustang Master
Apr 10, 2002
9,039
6
79
Charlotte, NC
May 19, 2004
#15
  • May 19, 2004
  • #15
qdrhrse - thanks for that - I've often suspected that the "HTS" coatings offered by manufacturers aren't bona fide ceramic coatings. If they were, they simply wouldn't come off that way or they were misapplied.
 

cardudeusa

Founding Member
Oct 22, 2002
1,744
5
48
Home of the Florida Gators!
May 19, 2004
#16
  • May 19, 2004
  • #16
91StangLX said:
Now I had the BBK shorties and they would not seal up to the heads.
Click to expand...

I had the same exact problem with my BBK shorties. I tried 3 different gaskets, stock Mr Gasket Ultra Seal, stock Ford gaskets, and copper. The final time I took them off to try and figure out why they wouldnt seal, three of the studs that the H pipe hooked onto broke. Now they are a nice expensive set of wheel chocks.
 

FiveO

Founding Member
Jan 28, 2001
1,146
0
0
NJ
May 19, 2004
#17
  • May 19, 2004
  • #17
well after i was told that i could just pop the dipstick out, i decided to go with the bbk 1515's, cheap chromies. and summit has them cheaper then mac sells their cheepest
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

1973 Headers
  • Stang_1973
  • Mar 11, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
125
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Apr 1, 2025
Noobz347
D
Rockers, lash adjusters and timing: help with parts (4.6 2v)
  • dvigAtel
  • Nov 1, 2025
  • Other Auto Tech
Replies
0
Views
236
Other Auto Tech Nov 1, 2025
dvigAtel
D
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
848
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
R
What's it Worth? 1997 Cobra, a ton of mods and restoration
  • riored97snake
  • Jun 18, 2026
  • What is it Worth?!?!?
Replies
2
Views
149
What is it Worth?!?!? Jun 21, 2026
riored97snake
R
S
Drivetrain 8.8 Pinion and 302 rear main seal leaks after replacing. 93 5.0 with t-5
  • Steigy4827
  • Jun 23, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
10
Views
657
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Apr 1, 2026
Steigy4827
S
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?