• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

Degreeing a cam

  • Thread starter Thread starter Pops Fun
  • Start date Start date Dec 25, 2004

Pops Fun

10 Year Member
Feb 15, 2003
961
14
59
Cincinnati, Ohio
Dec 25, 2004
#1
  • Dec 25, 2004
  • #1
Hi,

Just installed a 347 with a steeda 19 cam. Thread http://forums.stangnet.com/showthread.php?t=527588
Degreed the cam and found centerline 2.5 degrees off the o mark. So installed the cam 2 degrees advanced..
Question 1 will that have any effect on performance. Someone told me that you need to make a 5 degree change to see a difference??

Question 2 if you can see a difference will it affect the bottom or give me a few more revs at the top, the top is the way I reckon it.

Old dyno sheet http://members.nuvox.net/~zt.steveh/mustang/dyno2.html
New later this week I hope.

Steve
 

Joes95GT

New Member
Jan 23, 2003
3,132
1
0
Delaware
Dec 25, 2004
#2
  • Dec 25, 2004
  • #2
Ideally you want a cam that is installed within 2* of it's straight-up centerline. If you are degreeing a cam more than that (especially when retarding it) you are laming it out and doing more harm than good.

The centerline of the camshaft has the largest affect on performance than any other part or combination of parts. The centerline of a camshaft can mean anything from zero horsepower to "lotsa" horsepower. With a quality timing set you can degree a camshaft in 2* increments and 2* makes a VERY large difference in performance. So to answer Question 1: Yes, there is a difference in performance, and generally, most cams perform well advanced, hence the reason Comp grinds their cams with +4* built into them.

When a camshaft is advanced, the power curve of the motor is shifted down a few hundred RPM (generally speaking). When it is retarded, the power curve of the motor is shifted up a few hundred RPM. Since the Steeda 19 is such a mild cam, I don't think you would notice too much lost RPM up top. You should have tons of low-speed torque though.

Joe
 

Pops Fun

10 Year Member
Feb 15, 2003
961
14
59
Cincinnati, Ohio
Dec 25, 2004
#3
  • Dec 25, 2004
  • #3
Hi,
Thanks for the information,

Steve
 

Killercanary

The car that set the bar.
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
5,676
1
76
Altoona, PA
Dec 25, 2004
#4
  • Dec 25, 2004
  • #4
Steve (and Joe correct me if I am wrong) I think with your intake and cam combo, your car may have actually performed better with it retarded a few degrees since the added cubes of the stroker (given all else being equal to your 302 setup) would have sucked a few hundred rpm out of the peaks. The retarding of the cam, like Joe said, will typically shift your powerband up a little higher in the rpm range which in this case could be beneficial with the added cubes, but ultimately it may be limited by the cobra intake.

JFYI- when you get an FTI cam it comes with two intake centerlines dependent on the weight of the car. In my dad's NA 91GT he was borderline on the weight and IC recommendations so we installed it at the RETARDED setting. At the track the car just didn't perform right, so we advanced it 2* and BAM the car immediately responded with a gain of 2-3mph in trap speeds... but on the dyno it lost 10rwhp at the peak! All I can say is that you should run and dyno it where its at now, and if it runs out of steam too early, retarding it "may" help move the rpm band up but as I said the intake might limit any changes in the rpm range of the powerband made here due to the runner length and volume.
 

Pops Fun

10 Year Member
Feb 15, 2003
961
14
59
Cincinnati, Ohio
Dec 26, 2004
#5
  • Dec 26, 2004
  • #5
Hi,
Thanks for the info Paul still trying to figure things out. Probably will do a cam this summer. Well moving the cam is prpbably only a weekend so we will see what happeans if it needs to be moved it might wait for the new one. More torque down low will probably push me to suspension upgrades..... I hear you are getting into that now. Haven't done anything there but HP mega-bite upper and lowers.
Well thanks for the info

Steve
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
1K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Oct 19, 2026
mattcrp1
M
A
Fox Planning on building my foxbody and was wondering if I can get any tips or anything to watch out for!
  • Angelq1028
  • Oct 31, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3 4
Replies
76
Views
6K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 29, 2025
Robman8028
R
Throttle cut out at 3500 rpm
  • Piranahbite
  • Jul 8, 2023
  • 2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech
Replies
16
Views
4K
2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech Nov 9, 2023
AeroCoupe
C
Cam question
  • ClayBelt
  • Oct 8, 2021
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
6
Views
1K
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Nov 16, 2022
Yel2002GTAuto
Y
SN Mustang Magnum T56 swap
  • revhead347
  • May 24, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
15
Views
7K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jun 28, 2026
GearHeadGuy
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?