• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

difference between harmonic balancers?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mattrod70
  • Start date Start date Jun 17, 2005
M

mattrod70

New Member
Mar 31, 2005
54
0
0
Jun 17, 2005
#1
  • Jun 17, 2005
  • #1
so i replaced the old shot 302 in my 70 with a "new" thousand mile 289. it has been a litlle over a year since i swapped it and parts have come and gone. the harmonic balancer i just put on is the one for the 302 and i don't want to risk harming the engine. will it hurt it or is it ok?

matt
 

dennis112

15 Year Member
May 15, 2005
1,561
36
79
Amish Wonderland of Central PA.
Jun 17, 2005
#2
  • Jun 17, 2005
  • #2
mattrod70 said:
so i replaced the old shot 302 in my 70 with a "new" thousand mile 289. it has been a litlle over a year since i swapped it and parts have come and gone. the harmonic balancer i just put on is the one for the 302 and i don't want to risk harming the engine. will it hurt it or is it ok?

matt
Click to expand...

If the 302 is an original 70' model (not a 80's+) it will work fine on your 289 except the timing marks will be in a different place. You will need a pointer on the passenger side (use the one from the 70.) Also note that the 70' has a water pump that the lower hoses exit out on the driver's side. Although this pump is not necessary, it helps to see the passenger side timing marks. If this 289 is going in a 70' model, it will all work great.

Hope that's clear enough. . . . .
 
M

mattrod70

New Member
Mar 31, 2005
54
0
0
Jun 17, 2005
#3
  • Jun 17, 2005
  • #3
what i did was install the 302 timing cover and water pum p to alleviate any radiator hose issues (i had plenty with my radiator and the 289 front cover) and now i positioned the engine at top dead center and the marks are offset to the drivers side exactly where i cant see to put a pointer.

i could put a pointer on the passenger side but if it is not lined up when i aam at tdc would it not be uselss?

thanks matt
 

dennis112

15 Year Member
May 15, 2005
1,561
36
79
Amish Wonderland of Central PA.
Jun 17, 2005
#4
  • Jun 17, 2005
  • #4
mattrod70 said:
what i did was install the 302 timing cover and water pum p to alleviate any radiator hose issues (i had plenty with my radiator and the 289 front cover) and now i positioned the engine at top dead center and the marks are offset to the drivers side exactly where i cant see to put a pointer.

i could put a pointer on the passenger side but if it is not lined up when i aam at tdc would it not be uselss?

thanks matt
Click to expand...

Sorry if all this seems confusing. Maybe I should have said in the beginning that in order to use a 289 in place of a 70 model 302, you need to swap these items from the 302 and put them on the 289.

1. Timing chain cover
2. Harmonic balancer
3. 4 bolt crankshaft pulley
4. Water pump

If this is what you did and it didn't work, read on and then answer a few questions so we can solve it.

Which side of the car do you need the lower radiator hose--driver's or passengers? The 70 should be on the driver's side.

I thought you said you already installed the 70's balancer. If your true TDC is on the driver's side, then the harmonic balancer is from a 69' or earlier model 289/351/351w. Does the pulley mount with 3 bolts??

In 1970 Ford swapped stuff around on the 302&351 and put the TDC pointer on the passenger side, moved the TDC on the balancer, and put the lower waterpump outlet on the driver's side. They also went with a 4 bolt balancer pulley. Check for a casting # on the balancer that begins with a C or a D and post it.

So, if you need the balancer TDC to be the passenger side, you will either need to find a 70 model balancer (all of which require 4 bolt pulleys) OR determine TDC using a piston stop/timing degree wheel and then remark the balancer where the new TDC will be.

The good news is that engine balance will not be affected as it is the same until the 80's on the 302.

Hope this helped clear it up.

Good Luck!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Wanting to replace my BOSS 351C Engine Harmonic Balancer - Questions about 'Balance?'
  • 69machmike
  • Oct 31, 2024
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
553
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Nov 5, 2024
Realmongo
F
Difference between 83-86 EFI and 87-97 gas tanks?
  • ForeverDrivin
  • Mar 30, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
158
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 30, 2026
ForeverDrivin
F
J
2004 Mustang 3.8L V6 vibrations above 65 MPH and differential leaks
  • joeybuddy96
  • Mar 16, 2026
  • SN95 V6 Mustang Tech
Replies
12
Views
371
SN95 V6 Mustang Tech May 5, 2026
joeybuddy96
J
S
Drivetrain 8.8 Pinion and 302 rear main seal leaks after replacing. 93 5.0 with t-5
  • Steigy4827
  • Jun 23, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
10
Views
606
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Apr 1, 2026
Steigy4827
S
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?