Different dyno's ???? accurate results?

Ok guys, ease my mind w/this one. January I did a dyno on my car w/very minimal mods (UD pullies, mac shorties, mac hi flow cat h pipe, borla xhaust and k-n air filter.) and results were 216 HP. This was on a Dyno-Jet Dynamometer.

Fast fwd to last Sunday and I dyno'd again w/the same parts except for addition of CAI, UD pullies/short belt bypassing smog pump and off road H pipe. Results: 237 on first pull and 240 on second. Thats a +21-24 Hp jump.

BTW: This was on a Mustang Dynomometer (thats what it said at top of the sheet.) I know I should have gone back to the same place as last dyno instead of using two difft pieces of equipment. Are the addition of these parts REALLY worth that much? :bang:
 
A lot of times you see dyno results that came from a Mustang Dyno are lower than when done on a Dynojet.

Never the less, you should have gotten a gain from your new mods for sure.

Later
Grady
 
harley02 said:
. January I did a dyno on my car w/very minimal mods

Fast fwd to last Sunday and I dyno'd again w/the same parts except for addition of CAI, UD pullies/short belt bypassing smog pump and off road H pipe.\


Diffrent time of yr as well, tempature may have played a roll as well. Diffrence between Jan and end of April can swing alot. We have seen 80 this april and below zero in Jan. all depends upon your location