• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Differnces b/w 302W & 351W

  • Thread starter Thread starter snowball
  • Start date Start date Dec 24, 2004
S

snowball

New Member
Dec 10, 2004
44
0
0
Melbourne, Australia
Dec 24, 2004
#1
  • Dec 24, 2004
  • #1
I was having a chat with my brother yesterday and we were trying to identify the differences between a 302W and a 351W. What are the visual difference between these 2 engines? I understand the deck height on the 351 is about 1 in taller and the firing order is different than the 302. I am also lead to believe the intake manifold on the 302 has 12 bolts while the 351 has 16.

Is there anything else to look out for?

I've had a look at a few previous threads but they seem to focus on the internals.

Thanks for your help and Merry Christmas.
 

fvike

Member
Aug 24, 2004
335
0
16
Mosjøen, Norway
Dec 24, 2004
#2
  • Dec 24, 2004
  • #2
The 351 is just bigger. Wider "shoulders".
 

latamud

Founding Member
Oct 22, 2002
791
2
19
Tampa, FL
Dec 24, 2004
#3
  • Dec 24, 2004
  • #3
The 351 has as many intake bolts as a 302, if you think about it they use the same heads so the intake holes would be the same. The cam, which determines the firing order, is interchangable. The roller 302 cam uses 351w firing order. The oil pan, oil pump, oil pump shaft, distributor are different, 351w is wider. The timing chain and cover are the same. Some 302s are 28 oz imbalanced, some are 50oz. I'm not sure but I think all 351ws are 28oz. The balancers are interchangable as well as flywheel/flex plate.
I am swapping a 351w into my 66 soon. Not everything swaps over, have fun.
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Dec 25, 2004
#4
  • Dec 25, 2004
  • #4
The early 351W's have 16 intake bolts. The 78-up ones have the same number of intake bolts, because at that point, they used the same heads as the 302's.
 

brianj5600

Active Member
Sep 19, 2003
1,964
2
39
Middle TN
Dec 25, 2004
#5
  • Dec 25, 2004
  • #5
The easiest way for me to tell them apart is the deck in relation to the water pump passages. 302s the deck is barely above the water passages going into the block. 351s have bout an inch from the deck down to the water passages. As far as the intakes go, a 302 intake will bolt up to any 351w head. The extra holes make no difference. The water passages are shaped a little different, but seal fine with a 351w intake gasket.
 

Max Power

Active Member
Jul 31, 2003
1,774
1
36
St Paul
Dec 25, 2004
#6
  • Dec 25, 2004
  • #6
Easiest visual way to tell just looking under the hood is the width of the intake manifold. After looking at a bunch you will get good at it.
 

thehueypilot

Active Member
Feb 25, 2004
1,084
0
37
Medina,Tennessee
Dec 25, 2004
#7
  • Dec 25, 2004
  • #7
latamud said:
Some 302s are 28 oz imbalanced, some are 50oz. I'm not sure but I think all 351ws are 28oz.

In 1981 Ford changed all V8 engine balance going from 28.2 oz/in to a 50 oz/in specification.
Overall length= 27.5" for 302 and for 351W
Overall width = 18.75" for 302 vs. 21" for 351W
Overall height (oil pan to manifold) = 20.75 for 302 vs. 23.75" for 351W
Click to expand...
 

latamud

Founding Member
Oct 22, 2002
791
2
19
Tampa, FL
Dec 25, 2004
#8
  • Dec 25, 2004
  • #8
thehueypilot said:
latamud said:
Some 302s are 28 oz imbalanced, some are 50oz. I'm not sure but I think all 351ws are 28oz.

In 1981 Ford changed all V8 engine balance going from 28.2 oz/in to a 50 oz/in specification.
Overall length= 27.5" for 302 and for 351W
Overall width = 18.75" for 302 vs. 21" for 351W
Overall height (oil pan to manifold) = 20.75 for 302 vs. 23.75" for 351W
Click to expand...

Everyone I ask tells me my 89 351W is 28 oz. This is news to me, but it's good to know.
Click to expand...
 

latamud

Founding Member
Oct 22, 2002
791
2
19
Tampa, FL
Dec 25, 2004
#9
  • Dec 25, 2004
  • #9
And every search for 351W imbalance turns up 28oz for all years.
 

65fastback2+2

New Member
Aug 4, 2003
1,229
0
0
Louisville, KY
Dec 25, 2004
#10
  • Dec 25, 2004
  • #10
i remember hearing that a boss 302 was actually a big block just not bored as much or something like that???
 
8

86bluecobra

Advanced Member
Dec 20, 2004
4,265
12
69
B.C. Canada
Dec 25, 2004
#11
  • Dec 25, 2004
  • #11
all 351W are 28oz as far as intake bolt holes go i guess thats only differant if u r using an old set of 351 W heads. since the 5.0L craze why would anyone want to run stock 351 heads when afr and edelbrock and holley etc etc etc make such great heads. u can tell a 351 pretty easy by the sound it makes. way more throaty then a 302 well atleast with same exhaust installed. Im always getting 5.0L guys asking which exhaust sytem i have installed usally the same as them 40 series flowmasters its just mine sounds way better
 
8

86bluecobra

Advanced Member
Dec 20, 2004
4,265
12
69
B.C. Canada
Dec 25, 2004
#12
  • Dec 25, 2004
  • #12
a 351W has same firing order as a 302 H.O. but not that same as a regular 302 not sure if its same as a 289 H.O.
 

latamud

Founding Member
Oct 22, 2002
791
2
19
Tampa, FL
Dec 26, 2004
#13
  • Dec 26, 2004
  • #13
86bluecobra said:
a 351W has same firing order as a 302 H.O. but not that same as a regular 302 not sure if its same as a 289 H.O.
Click to expand...

The hipo 289 has same firing order as a 289. But you can put a 351w cam in any 289/302 and use the 351w firing order.
 

latamud

Founding Member
Oct 22, 2002
791
2
19
Tampa, FL
Dec 26, 2004
#14
  • Dec 26, 2004
  • #14
65fastback2+2 said:
i remember hearing that a boss 302 was actually a big block just not bored as much or something like that???
Click to expand...

BOSS 302 is a 302 block.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
H
SOLD Trick Flow 351w R series EFI manifold upper and lower NEW In BOX NEVER installed
  • Hizdudeness
  • Mar 6, 2024
  • Engine and Power Adder
Replies
2
Views
3K
Engine and Power Adder Mar 6, 2024
Hizdudeness
H
Which one of these 3 intakes make the most sense for my 331 combo
  • from6to8
  • Jul 25, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
7
Views
2K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jul 26, 2024
AeroCoupe
SN Mustang Magnum T56 swap
  • revhead347
  • May 24, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
15
Views
6K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jun 28, 2026
GearHeadGuy
A
94' Cobra Dies with AC is on
  • Acj2001_Fordman
  • Jul 2, 2019
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
41
Views
7K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Aug 24, 2019
Acj2001_Fordman
A
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?