• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Disappointed....93 LX vs. 86 GT

  • Thread starter Thread starter casper98gt
  • Start date Start date Oct 7, 2007
C

casper98gt

Member
Jun 27, 2005
66
0
6
NH
Oct 7, 2007
#1
  • Oct 7, 2007
  • #1
So i finally got everything straight on my car and a buddy in his 86 GT wanted to cruise. So we did...then i asked him if he wanted to run it on the highway. So we were driving around and we got to the on ramp and as soon as i saw his brake lights go off i hopped on it in second gear and i blew by him about 4-5 cars on him. Then we slowed down and i slapped it in 3rd at around 3000rpms and we both went. Kinda dissipointed in my performance to say the least. We stayed side by side with my starting to pull very slightly.

Him: 1986 GT, 3.73's, 1993 Upper intake and TB/EGR , 14 degrees of timing, K&N filter, flowmaster catback.

Me: 1993 Lx, Trickflow upper/lower, 75mm TB and EGR, 12 degrees of timing, sn95 fuel rails with BBK regulator set at 40psi, JLT CAI, Underdrive pulleys, Flowmaster catback, gears unknown ( possibly 3.55's ), elect fan, a/c delete, and smog delete, msd cap/rotor, ford racing 8mm wires and fresh tune-up ( plugs, pcv, and fuel filter)
 

foxmustangman

Member
Jun 20, 2007
196
1
16
Idaho
Oct 7, 2007
#2
  • Oct 7, 2007
  • #2
I'd say it was his gears...but i dont know.
 

z2o_what

Member
Mar 31, 2005
309
1
19
princeton, WV
Oct 7, 2007
#3
  • Oct 7, 2007
  • #3
foxmustangman said:
I'd say it was his gears...but i dont know.
Click to expand...

it had to be the gears... or the driver
 

2000xp8

SN Certified Technician
Aug 8, 2003
8,024
1,616
194
NJ
Oct 7, 2007
#4
  • Oct 7, 2007
  • #4
The gears were probably a part of it.
You may have too much intake and TB for stock heads and cam, hurting your low end power.
 
D

Daggar

New Member
Jul 19, 2004
3,902
5
0
Oct 7, 2007
#5
  • Oct 7, 2007
  • #5
His gears helped, no doubt. I also think he shifted smartly and rode on-top of the torque curve of those E6 heads, 86 cam, and SD induction.
 
S

stump1001

New Member
Oct 7, 2007
1
0
0
Oct 7, 2007
#6
  • Oct 7, 2007
  • #6
You have a long list there, but most of that stuff adds little or no hp. You have an intake and pullies on him, but thats about it. His car could be lighter weight and he also has more gear. And you did pull him, so it seems about right to me.
 

BK_CAULEY

it's built for speed not longevity, woman
Dec 26, 2006
0
10
49
Thomasville, ga
Oct 7, 2007
#7
  • Oct 7, 2007
  • #7
his car is lighter. his gears is his definate advantage. and most of your parts arent really performance there just better stock stuff. the only reall performance you have is the trick flow intake and throttle body.
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,249
17,934
224
Massachusetts
Oct 7, 2007
#8
  • Oct 7, 2007
  • #8
2000xp8 said:
You may have too much intake and TB for stock heads and cam, hurting your low end power.
Click to expand...


+1


75mm TB and EGR are huge for stock heads and prob hurting you a bit
 
C

casper98gt

Member
Jun 27, 2005
66
0
6
NH
Oct 7, 2007
#9
  • Oct 7, 2007
  • #9
Cool thanks for the reply everyone. Im deff. the better driver and he i had to edge him on to even race me. BEcause he thought he would loose. The first time i ran him from 2nd gear higher up in the rpms i crushed him. I held out to about 6000rpms and let the intake do its job. But youre right maybe too much air and not enough motor to use it. I have a F-cam and X302 heads with 1.6's in the basement that will go on soon then shortly after a Vortech V2-SQ.

are the 86 GT's really that much lighter than my 93 Lx ? The gears did the job i guess...he shifted much quicker than I did, seeing how his shift light lit up both of our cars. haha

He runs a 14.4 in thw 1/4 so im assuming i would be about the same.
 

85_SS_302_Coupe

it sucks (I know) to be on the receiving end
15 Year Member
Nov 11, 2003
6,945
1,598
223
Northern KY
Oct 7, 2007
#10
  • Oct 7, 2007
  • #10
2000xp8 said:
The gears were probably a part of it.
You may have too much intake and TB for stock heads and cam, hurting your low end power.
Click to expand...


That and the gears.....by the time your intake and TB are waking up, your heads and cam are running out of breath. I had the same problem running a Victor Jr. intake on my stock long block...it's just overkill.
 

Aliate X

Member
May 9, 2005
602
1
18
Rockland NY
Oct 7, 2007
#11
  • Oct 7, 2007
  • #11
Gears shouldnt help from a roll unless youre amazing at shifting. With lower gears hes going to have to shift less obviously. The small benefit of gears from a roll is negated by the fact you have to shift, unless of course youre really good at shifting. From a stop is a completely different story.
 

clement

Founding Member
Feb 27, 2001
1,106
52
59
Oak Cliff
Oct 7, 2007
#12
  • Oct 7, 2007
  • #12
that 75mm tb is killing you with stock cam. put the stock tb back on and see how it does. even then, you still arent going to beat him by much.
 

ninety15.0

New Member
Mar 10, 2004
1,336
0
0
Oct 8, 2007
#13
  • Oct 8, 2007
  • #13
Sounds about right. It takes a big difference in power to really walk away from someone. You are probably making about 25 more HP than him...thats not going to make a big difference!

Jack up your rear end and count the number of driveshaft revs per one tire revolution. That will tell you exactly what gears you have in the car! 3.5 revs = 3.55s
 

87foxstang

Member
May 10, 2007
0
0
16
Cromwell, CT
Oct 8, 2007
#14
  • Oct 8, 2007
  • #14
Hey try this next time, this is how i usually get the jump on cars i race... You said you dropped it into third around 3K rpms, well next time, keep it in third at around that same rpm then when your about to go, downshift to second and put it to the floor...Not alot of people do this, they usually just stomp on it in whatever gear they are in. But im telling you, drop it into second hard, dump the clutch and hit it. Not sure if you guys already do this but i know nobody else i raced has done this, they always just punch it in the gear they're in.
 
C

casper98gt

Member
Jun 27, 2005
66
0
6
NH
Oct 8, 2007
#15
  • Oct 8, 2007
  • #15
yeah i spun the driveshaft in the air and it spun 3 and about 1/2 turns for one wheel revolution.

I dont think i would have dared ram it into 2nd at highway speeds. Not sure how much it would have helped especially if i was already close to redline, then i would just have to shift and take up more time. We stayed side by side from the punch up to the end of the rpm range i would pull up top. I'll run him again sometime down the line and let you know how it goes....In the process of tearing it down for a cam and heads with 1.6's.

With Ford Racing X303 heads, what is a good long tube to run. I was thinking BBK long tubes with a catted short mid pipe and who knows what catback i will run. Are there any cheap long tubes that still work good ?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

S
Progress Thread 1989 LX 5.0 convertible - mild project
  • Scott_S
  • Aug 18, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 4 5 6
Replies
107
Views
3K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 26, 2026
AeroCoupe
Interior and Upholstery 87-93 Mustang Metal Side Headliner Trim Clips Upper Hatchback Coupe Door OEM 524
  • Noobz347
  • May 25, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
0
Views
412
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 25, 2025
Noobz347
S
Fuel ‘88 GT Runs Rich Cold — Fixes Itself When I Unplug Sensors (ECT, MAF, O2, etc.)
  • Sufarry
  • Nov 6, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
12
Views
828
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Nov 9, 2025
Mustang5L5
J
Progress Thread Family member 1989 GT- Backstory and updates
  • JRC99
  • Apr 19, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
15
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 26, 2025
JRC99
J
New Member with a 1992
  • Clutchfork
  • Oct 18, 2025
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
5
Views
293
The Welcome Wagon Oct 19, 2025
Clutchfork
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?