• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

DIYWB help!

  • Thread starter Thread starter tjh566
  • Start date Start date Mar 3, 2007
T

tjh566

New Member
May 22, 2004
608
0
0
Northern Va
Mar 3, 2007
#1
  • Mar 3, 2007
  • #1
When data loging tweecer is seeing 10.00 AFR flat at WOT, my gauge is reading 11.3-11.9, I lean it out some and my gauge shows the change but in tweecer its still 10.00 flat, I wanna know what to do, cus i dont wanna keep leaning it out for the value in tweecer and damge my engine, cus im already at the point (on my gauge) where I dont wanna go any leaner.
 
T

tjh566

New Member
May 22, 2004
608
0
0
Northern Va
Mar 3, 2007
#2
  • Mar 3, 2007
  • #2
switch the settings to the AEM one on calcon and now it reads like 9.8 but the gauge is still reading around 11.5, was on the DIYWB setting on calcon. need to know which to tune by or if i have a setting wrong or what??
 

m0l0

Member
Nov 20, 2005
178
0
17
Mar 3, 2007
#3
  • Mar 3, 2007
  • #3
You have to edit your wideband Database according to the voltage vs. AFR , for example for the LC-1 i used as base the INNOVATE.DB located on the installation directory "C:\Program Files\STKR 1.30A\Data" as a base and used the sensor "Warming Voltage" as a reference. You have to doit with excel, or in the best case if you have EA you can doit there. , and save it as DBF version IV. I will post my table if it´s useful to you:

VOLTS AF
0.000 7.350
0.117 7.700
0.233 8.052
0.350 8.403
0.467 8.754
0.583 9.105
0.700 9.456
0.817 9.806
0.933 10.157
1.050 10.508
1.167 10.859
1.283 11.210
1.400 11.561
1.517 11.912
1.633 12.263
1.750 12.614
1.867 12.965
1.983 13.316
2.100 13.667
2.217 14.018
2.333 14.369
2.450 14.720
2.567 15.071
2.683 15.421
2.800 15.772
2.917 16.123
3.033 16.474
3.150 16.825
3.200 17.176
3.325 17.527
3.500 17.878
3.617 18.229
3.733 18.580
3.850 18.931
3.970 19.282
4.083 19.633
4.200 19.983
4.317 20.335
4.433 20.686
4.500 21.036
4.667 21.387
4.783 21.738
4.900 22.089
5.000 22.390


Its not that complicated but a little time consuming and in most cases it will be diferent since your wiring will have some diference in the resistance. so its always better to fine tune this table to your readings.
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Mar 3, 2007
#4
  • Mar 3, 2007
  • #4
Let me raise a red flag of caution right here and now

I want to stress
You're in an area here where you really want to ............
keep your head clear
AND
if you have ANY doubts ANY doubts at all

Make small changes ... and ... verify with datalogging

m0l0 ... did you not find you had issues A F T E R you had
leaned back your curve ... a good bit

It might behoove you to put your curve back to stock
and start from fresh

Usually, your factory curve is not gonna be all that far off

Also, I wanna point out another important issue with these WB's

Peeps in the past have had issues of inaccuracy when
working dual outputs

Or in other words ... Having their digital display working
simultaneously with their analog output feeding the
Tweecer interface.

I noticed a slight difference with my OLD FJO wb
sooooo
The digital display has been discoed now for a couple of years

No biggie as its just a bunch of numbers jumpin around

anyway ... go over to the .org site and you'll find lots
of info about this dual display hosed reading issue.

Just a friendly heads up for ya

Grady
 
T

tjh566

New Member
May 22, 2004
608
0
0
Northern Va
Mar 3, 2007
#5
  • Mar 3, 2007
  • #5
Thanks, Looking at the files this appears to be the problem! When I did this I kinda thought how does it know afr, then I just though all of them were the same or something, found the real numbers for my setup, gonna test it out in a few!
 

m0l0

Member
Nov 20, 2005
178
0
17
Mar 3, 2007
#6
  • Mar 3, 2007
  • #6
final5-0 said:
Just a friendly heads up for ya

Grady
Click to expand...
Yep maybe there are some cases you will have some diferent numbers across the use on dual ouputs , but however in my case since i am not working with dual output feed just a single output , i use the serial output (gauge calcons reading from th EVP and direct serial connection to the LC-1 , so whatever i check first is the direct feed from the LC-1 and then the calcon reading , now i have a correctly calibrated AFR vs. volt on my DB wideband setup. and yes i had some problems on the past but as you stated my WB needed a recalibration and now is reading pretty much accurate , also you are right the stock MAF transfer curve was not that off from the original 10% more rich aprox.
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Mar 4, 2007
#7
  • Mar 4, 2007
  • #7
m0l0 said:
Yep maybe there are some cases you will have some diferent numbers across the use on dual ouputs , but however in my case since i am not working with dual output feed just a single output , i use the serial output (gauge calcons reading from th EVP and direct serial connection to the LC-1 , so whatever i check first is the direct feed from the LC-1 and then the calcon reading , now i have a correctly calibrated AFR vs. volt on my DB wideband setup. and yes i had some problems on the past but as you stated my WB needed a recalibration and now is reading pretty much accurate , also you are right the stock MAF transfer curve was not that off from the original 10% more rich aprox.
Click to expand...

I had no idea whatsoever what could be driving those values
to a reading of 7 to 1

I just knew you could not REALLY be as fat as that

With something that fat in place

You could watch the gas gauge fall as the tach climbs

Grady
 
T

tjh566

New Member
May 22, 2004
608
0
0
Northern Va
Mar 4, 2007
#8
  • Mar 4, 2007
  • #8
works now, it was the file, needed my numbers thanks guys! helpful as always
 

m0l0

Member
Nov 20, 2005
178
0
17
Mar 4, 2007
#9
  • Mar 4, 2007
  • #9
final5-0 said:
I had no idea whatsoever what could be driving those values
to a reading of 7 to 1

I just knew you could not REALLY be as fat as that

With something that fat in place

You could watch the gas gauge fall as the tach climbs

Grady
Click to expand...

Lol Yes indeed!


tjh566 said:
works now, it was the file, needed my numbers thanks guys! helpful as always
Click to expand...

good to hear that
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Tips for WUE and ASE tuning
  • Mustang5L5
  • Oct 9, 2025
  • Digital Self-tuning Forum
Replies
1
Views
568
Digital Self-tuning Forum Oct 10, 2025
gkomo
X
Free VE Table Corrections — Drop Your MSQ and a Datalog, I'll Do the Rest
  • X-cam34
  • Apr 12, 2026
  • Digital Self-tuning Forum
  • 2
Replies
32
Views
886
Digital Self-tuning Forum Yesterday at 12:38 AM
X-cam34
X
F
Trouble Shooting Sudden Shift of AFR at low RPM
  • Farva_84
  • Jun 6, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
8
Views
497
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Jun 8, 2025
Farva_84
F
X
VE Table Not Dialed? Send Me Your Datalog.
  • X-cam34
  • Feb 8, 2026
  • Digital Self-tuning Forum
  • 2 3
Replies
49
Views
1K
Digital Self-tuning Forum May 1, 2026
X-cam34
X
Tuning help! - HEGO 2 @ 64 volts!!!
  • VenomousISA
  • Feb 20, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
277
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Feb 26, 2025
VenomousISA
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?