• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Do all headers require a power steering drop bracket?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Stang_1973
  • Start date Start date Oct 13, 2005

Stang_1973

Founding Member
Jul 13, 2001
565
9
38
San Antonio, Tx.
Oct 13, 2005
#1
  • Oct 13, 2005
  • #1
I am going to get a set of headers for my '73. I have seen Hooker, Flowtech and Hedman. Flowtech and Hooker require a power steering bracket for clearance as listed on Jegs and Year one. However Hedmans Hedders on jegs does not say anything about a bracket when you click on the details. So will they just fit as is or will I have clearance issues? Any one used these headers before?
 
B

bnickel

Founding Member
Aug 21, 2002
5,640
3
77
lubbock, texas
Oct 13, 2005
#2
  • Oct 13, 2005
  • #2
i don't see why you would need a bracket with any of them on a 73 since the power steering is integral to the gearbox and not an add-on unit like the 65-70 cars had
 

mudbilly

Member
Jun 3, 2005
175
0
16
South County, Maryland
Oct 14, 2005
#3
  • Oct 14, 2005
  • #3
i've got hedman ceramic shorties on mine, goning into 2 1/2 collectors..........i couldn't really find a long tube that was guareenteed to fit.....plus i was afraid of ground clearance issues, i've got my nose dropped an inch...
 
G

Gud T.B. Blown

Member
Dec 9, 2004
583
1
18
Oct 14, 2005
#4
  • Oct 14, 2005
  • #4
i have a '73 mach with a 351C and i put on hooker super comp long tubes and no bracket was required. the headers are a pain to put in but there are no clearance problems under the hood. they fit, just barely, but they fit. my front end also has the 1" drop and so far i haven't scraped on anything.
 
1

10secgoal

Active Member
Dec 1, 2003
2,801
3
49
San Diego
Oct 14, 2005
#5
  • Oct 14, 2005
  • #5
I had a set of Heddman on my 67. The car was setup for P/S, but know pump. But that shouldn't matter as far as I can think. It still had the slave and what not. They were nice as far as ground clearance. Some of the better ones I have had/seen. But no bracket for me.
 
6

66StangFastback

New Member
Jun 6, 2005
181
0
0
norman, oklahoma
Oct 14, 2005
#6
  • Oct 14, 2005
  • #6
I have some hedman long tubes. The drivers side was a bitch to get in and had clearance problems with the power steering booster underneath, but we moved it just enough to solve that problem. Putting the power steering pump on tomorrow. Looks like there won't be any problems with clearance.
 
X

x73mach1x

New Member
Jul 3, 2005
65
0
0
maine
Oct 15, 2005
#7
  • Oct 15, 2005
  • #7
push rod how do you like your hooker super comps?? im still trying to figure out what to get for my 73 mach this spring when my engine is done???
 
F

ForceFed70

That's why they call it "dope"
Founding Member
Dec 6, 1999
4,818
1
69
BC Canada
Oct 15, 2005
#8
  • Oct 15, 2005
  • #8
I have headman longtubes on my '70.

They are a real pain to install. You have to pull the engine to get them in... And even then, when you put the engine back in you can't have the headers bolted to the engine or the exhaust... you sorta have to place them in the right spot as you drop in the engine.

A real PITA... I'll never do longtubes again..it's not worth the few HP over shorty's or Tri-y's.

Anyways... there is no powersteering clearance problems...BUT they are close enough to the ram that I have to replace my dust boot on the ram every few years. The heat kills the rubber...
 
G

Gud T.B. Blown

Member
Dec 9, 2004
583
1
18
Oct 15, 2005
#9
  • Oct 15, 2005
  • #9
x73mach1x said:
push rod how do you like your hooker super comps?? im still trying to figure out what to get for my 73 mach this spring when my engine is done???
Click to expand...

i'm real happy with them, they look and sound great and the quality is first rate. installation was pretty straightforward. the passenger side went in fairly easily, the drivers side was a bit more challenging. hooker tells you the car needs to be 3' above the ground for installation but you don't need to. on the passenger side 1' is plenty and on the drivers side if you can't get it 3' in the air you will have to remover your pitman arm.
like i said earlier i've lowered my car 1" in the front and i've had no scraping problems at all.
 
J

jbuening

Member
Apr 28, 2005
399
0
17
Oct 15, 2005
#10
  • Oct 15, 2005
  • #10
10secgoal said:
I had a set of Heddman on my 67. The car was setup for P/S, but know pump. But that shouldn't matter as far as I can think. It still had the slave and what not. They were nice as far as ground clearance. Some of the better ones I have had/seen. But no bracket for me.
Click to expand...

I bet your steering components wore out real quick without the power steering pump hooked up. The control valve and steering ram need fluid running through them for lubrication and without that leads to shortened life of the components and a sloppy steering wheel.

The 71-73 has integral power steering (think thats what it's called). Anyways, you don't have the steering ram or the control valve to get in the way. The hoses go straight from the pump to the steering box. I there was a way to convert the 69/70 steering systems to this type. The only thing that i would think may get in the way is the pitman arm or the drag link.
 
C

C0V3R

Member
Feb 14, 2003
524
0
16
Australia
Oct 15, 2005
#11
  • Oct 15, 2005
  • #11
IMO Avoid anything with a drop bracket OR prepare for your frame rails to be torn in a few months by the additional leverage applied by the bracket
 
6

66StangFastback

New Member
Jun 6, 2005
181
0
0
norman, oklahoma
Oct 15, 2005
#12
  • Oct 15, 2005
  • #12
70_Nitrous_Eater said:
I have headman longtubes on my '70.

They are a real pain to install. You have to pull the engine to get them in... And even then, when you put the engine back in you can't have the headers bolted to the engine or the exhaust... you sorta have to place them in the right spot as you drop in the engine.

A real PITA... I'll never do longtubes again..it's not worth the few HP over shorty's or Tri-y's.

Anyways... there is no powersteering clearance problems...BUT they are close enough to the ram that I have to replace my dust boot on the ram every few years. The heat kills the rubber...
Click to expand...

Exactly like mine on the 66. We didnt have to pull the engine, but we did use a 2x4 to..."maneuver" them into place. They were touching the dust boot and we figure it would melt the rubber in no time so we drilled new holes and moved the mounting bracket about 1/2" further up on the frame, and no problems with steering even with move. IF we ever replace the longtubes, I'll go with shorties because they ARE an amazing pain in the ass to get to fit. I'll just cut em out when they need to be replaced. We havent lowered the car back down to see clearance, but they are the lowest hanging part when you look underneath. Only good thing is they dont need a drop bracket on mine.
 
1

10secgoal

Active Member
Dec 1, 2003
2,801
3
49
San Diego
Oct 16, 2005
#13
  • Oct 16, 2005
  • #13
jbuening said:
I bet your steering components wore out real quick without the power steering pump hooked up. The control valve and steering ram need fluid running through them for lubrication and without that leads to shortened life of the components and a sloppy steering wheel.
Click to expand...

Didn't care. Didn't want the power steering to begine with. I removed it before it wore out.
 

Stang_1973

Founding Member
Jul 13, 2001
565
9
38
San Antonio, Tx.
Oct 20, 2005
#14
  • Oct 20, 2005
  • #14
Well we didnt need the bracket after all. On the jegs website it doesnt specify which cars dont need the bracket. It just says that some do need it. Once you actually get the headers it tells you on the instructions which cars dont need the bracket.

Oh yea i went ahead and got Dynomax standard series headers. They dont hang all that low and since I thought the job was tougher I went ahead and got our mechanic to do the install. He said it was relatively easy. We even went ahead and got all new tubing from the header back. Sounds better now. it sounds alot clearer and more distinct.

I havent gotten a chance to drive it yet so i am not sure how much of an improvement they make as far as the seat of the pants meter goes.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

S
1965 Mustang with 80s 5.0 engine in it Power Steering hose or connection ID?
  • spearce
  • May 19, 2026
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Replies
2
Views
119
Classic Mustang Specific Tech Jun 8, 2026
AeroCoupe
D
Power steering pump bracket with A/C
  • Dczookster
  • Apr 1, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
6
Views
863
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 2, 2025
rednotch
Exhaust 1 3/4” Long Tubes on a Fox Body AOD – Easiest route?
  • 5.0 Mike
  • Mar 19, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
6
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 21, 2025
5.0 Mike
X
Free VE Table Corrections — Drop Your MSQ and a Datalog, I'll Do the Rest
  • X-cam34
  • Apr 12, 2026
  • Digital Self-tuning Forum
  • 2 3
Replies
44
Views
1K
Digital Self-tuning Forum Monday at 1:31 AM
X-cam34
X
A
Engine 99 V6 Steering Pump Replacement
  • abs68206
  • May 23, 2025
  • SN95 V6 Mustang Tech
Replies
0
Views
203
SN95 V6 Mustang Tech May 23, 2025
abs68206
A
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?