• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Does anyone else have a combo close to this

  • Thread starter Thread starter 90Stanger302
  • Start date Start date Dec 10, 2025
9

90Stanger302

New Member
Apr 12, 2020
4
1
1
Maryland
Dec 10, 2025
#1
  • Dec 10, 2025
  • #1
I have 1994 5.0 motor, putting on AFR Renegade 165 heads, don't know if I should put new pistons in because the hydraulic roller cam is probably going to have .540 lift and roughly 227 and 240 duration at .050( it's going to be a custom grind. Should I just go with the stop pistons in motor with 4 valve reliefs or get new pistons (worried about piston to valve clearance) if you recommend new pistons, what should I get then , can you give me brand and part number would help
 

rednotch

I'd like to remain having one chocolate starfish
Founding Member
Aug 14, 2000
1,383
619
143
south jersey
Dec 10, 2025
#2
  • Dec 10, 2025
  • #2
The duration and overlap maybe be an issue for clearance on stock pistons, would have to check it. you can cut the relief in stock pistons If need be. Had similar combo years ago with first gen afr 165's, more lift but way less duration on a stock shortblock with no clearance issues, made over 400 only time it was dynoed on an engine dyno.. Most grinds for that combo with the stock releif 302 pistons you will notice are kept around or under 225 at .050 numbers. Best to talk with who evers doing the cam for it. Lift has little to do with clearance, its the timing of the lift in relation to where the piston is.
 
9

90Stanger302

New Member
Apr 12, 2020
4
1
1
Maryland
Dec 10, 2025
#3
  • Dec 10, 2025
  • #3
Ok thanks
 

AeroCoupe

lube between the nut and the face. I know my lubes
Founding Member
Oct 28, 2001
5,816
3,951
183
Claremore, OK
Dec 10, 2025
#4
  • Dec 10, 2025
  • #4
Great advice above. Kind of an assumption but do you know how to clay the pistons and check for clearance?
 
Q

Qtrhrse23

Member
Jul 2, 2024
18
7
13
Texas
Dec 25, 2025
#5
  • Dec 25, 2025
  • #5
Don't the 165s have 1.90 valves? If so stock pistons should have plenty of clearance with 227/540. Yea you should check, but I know I'm right. UNLESS IM wrong about the 1.90s.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

1
Clearance
  • 1993mustang50
  • Apr 3, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
134
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 4, 2026
2000xp8
9
Will I feel a difference
  • 90Stanger302
  • Mar 12, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
230
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Apr 13, 2026
Noobz347
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
728
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
SBF Head Flow Table - Work in Progress
  • Noobz347
  • Sep 29, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
17
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 30, 2025
Noobz347
C
Valve stem tip tap?
  • Coolen
  • Apr 6, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
843
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 14, 2025
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?