• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 V6 Mustang Tech

Does the weight of the rim or size affect the performance?

  • Thread starter Thread starter RicoSuave
  • Start date Start date Oct 15, 2004
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
R

RicoSuave

New Member
Oct 13, 2004
1
0
0
Oct 15, 2004
#1
  • Oct 15, 2004
  • #1
I'm thinking about putting Mac ones on my car. Depending on the company who makes these as well as knock offs, the weight of the rims vary. Does this affect the performance of my vehicle? Also, does it really matter if I get my rims used or new- taking into consideration that the used rims are not bent or damaged.
 

Ernad

celibate sans pants
Apr 2, 2004
0
1
0
Grand Rapids, MI
Oct 15, 2004
#2
  • Oct 15, 2004
  • #2
Rim size and weight matter. In simple terms the more mass you have, the more mass needs to be pushed, the lower your power to weight ratio.
Never heard of MAC wheels.
Used are fine as long as they are in good condition.
 
L

LCGimp

Founding Member
Jan 10, 2002
68
0
0
44
Oregon City, OR
Oct 15, 2004
#3
  • Oct 15, 2004
  • #3
For as far as weight goes, wheels probably have the most affect per pound, since they are both unsprung and rotating. I dont know how much of a difference it actually makes in feel though, as I've never driven the same car with a variety of wheels on it.
 

Ghostalker

Member
Jul 5, 2003
184
0
16
Danbury, CT
Oct 15, 2004
#4
  • Oct 15, 2004
  • #4
hmm, still doesnt make me question my choice of wheels, the huge bulky Bullit wheels in charcoal, muahahah... i think he meant Mach 1... maybe?
those seem to be pretty small... and... stuff... now i am going to go put some spoon rims on!? w00t
 

marvinmycat

Founding Member
Feb 13, 2002
1,179
0
0
60
Buffalo, NY
Oct 16, 2004
#5
  • Oct 16, 2004
  • #5
Also keep in mind that the size of the rim will affect the weight as well. That's why I won't go any bigger than 16".

You also want to ensure that the rim you are getting isn't billed as a light weight rim made of crappy material as a 17" or 18" rim more likely can be much more easily damaged from nice sized pot holes and curb jumping.

If you want some decent rims that are light weight, look into the Steeda Ultra-Lite series.
 

Ernad

celibate sans pants
Apr 2, 2004
0
1
0
Grand Rapids, MI
Oct 16, 2004
#6
  • Oct 16, 2004
  • #6
MarvinMyCat said:
Also keep in mind that the size of the rim will affect the weight as well. That's why I won't go any bigger than 16".

You also want to ensure that the rim you are getting isn't billed as a light weight rim made of crappy material as a 17" or 18" rim more likely can be much more easily damaged from nice sized pot holes and curb jumping.

If you want some decent rims that are light weight, look into the Steeda Ultra-Lite series.
Click to expand...
16 inchers rock
 

Ghostalker

Member
Jul 5, 2003
184
0
16
Danbury, CT
Oct 16, 2004
#7
  • Oct 16, 2004
  • #7
16s rock!



in my attic! lol Along with my brothers old exhaust (full) from his 01' GT conv...

funny story about his car, he has these giant cobra rotors (i think there cobra, there huge and have red calipers, with a running pony on them) on the front, they nearly fill inside of the wheel... we came to the conclusion that if he ever had a flat, he wouldnt be able to fit his spare over these giant rotors... so he would have to switch his rear wheel up to the front, and put the spare on the back. what makes it even funnier is he still has my offset rims, so now he would have 1 regular wheel on the front, one offset in the front, one offset in the back, and one spare in the back... this is why we make him carry a bottle of 'fix a flat' in his trunk... X_X
 
J

Jamez

Founding Member
Mar 2, 2000
2,609
0
0
41
Tulsa, Ok
stangdejames.stangnet.com
Oct 17, 2004
#8
  • Oct 17, 2004
  • #8
I'm just gonna reply to this thread to see my neat red Founding Member thing under my red name. Go red!
 

Ghostalker

Member
Jul 5, 2003
184
0
16
Danbury, CT
Oct 17, 2004
#9
  • Oct 17, 2004
  • #9
w00t! red! i like being a senior member... makes me feel all happy inside...
 

CManT1914

New Member
Feb 5, 2004
3,172
2
0
39
Killeen, Texas
Oct 26, 2004
#10
  • Oct 26, 2004
  • #10
Ghostalker said:
w00t! red! i like being a senior member... makes me feel all happy inside...
Click to expand...

amateur... j/k

I've heard that every 10 lbs of rotating weight is worth a 1/10th in the 1/4 mile, somebody back me up on this. I'm pretty sure it's acurate. That's why aluminum driveshafts are so popular.
 

232_slowness

New Member
Jul 23, 2004
74
0
0
Barksdale AFB
www.airforce.com
Oct 27, 2004
#11
  • Oct 27, 2004
  • #11
the bigger the rim the more torque the vehicle needs to apply in order to get these wheels moving, however depending on the tire type and the type of driving you do, bigger wheels can give you better faster turns on the track, however if you plan to do some drag racing, it can hamper your 1/8 to 1/4 mile time. I'd give more explanation on this but i don't wanna go into physics right now cause it's 1:43 am
 

marvinmycat

Founding Member
Feb 13, 2002
1,179
0
0
60
Buffalo, NY
Oct 27, 2004
#12
  • Oct 27, 2004
  • #12
Both of you are correctin this area. I'm not sure of the exact numbers, but when I hear that something screws up performance, I don't need to know the exact numbers, just that I don't want it!

I'll never go bigger than my 16" rims just because of the performance issue on rotational mass. I need every little bit of performance edge I can get!
 

RowdyRed94

Founding Member
Mar 9, 2000
1,140
0
36
St. Cloud, MN
Oct 28, 2004
#13
  • Oct 28, 2004
  • #13
If you're all about e/t's, stick with smaller rims. I've driven identical cars with both stock 16's and my 17's on the street, and I can tell you the difference in handling is remarkable. I could feel the flex and bounce in the 16's, whereas the 17's grip and turn the car much more aggressively. I don't do 1/4 miles, though.
 

marvinmycat

Founding Member
Feb 13, 2002
1,179
0
0
60
Buffalo, NY
Oct 28, 2004
#14
  • Oct 28, 2004
  • #14
I'm going to chime in here and say that a lot of the handling does depend on the tire manufacturer as well as the proper size tire for the application. I'm sure a top of the line 16" tire would out perform the 17" Sears special of the week tire.

But using identical tires on different sized rims would make a difference (properly sized).

That's just my two cents.
 
9

98V6

New Member
Oct 28, 2004
43
0
0
45
Baltimore, MD
Nov 1, 2004
#15
  • Nov 1, 2004
  • #15
I read a study I forget who did it, I think it was Steeda or Rousch. Pretty much they had car and put about 5 different wheel tire combos on it and dyno-ed it every time. They kept the over all height of the tire the same and increased the wheel size while decreasing the tire size. They found that the first and second sizes of aftermarket wheels worked the best even though they were taller then the stock wheels the stock wheels were steel and heavier. I think the stock wheels were 15 inch steel wheels, and 16 and 17 inch aluminum wheels worked best and when they got up to the taller sizes they saw a loss in horsepower on the dyno.

I might be off on the numbers because its been a while now and I can't remember but the point is if you put a rediculus 24 inch wheel on your car you will see less horsepower at the rear wheels. Me personally I want the lightest wheels I can get.
 

marvinmycat

Founding Member
Feb 13, 2002
1,179
0
0
60
Buffalo, NY
Nov 1, 2004
#16
  • Nov 1, 2004
  • #16
You have to use some amount of common sense when comparing 15, 16" steel rims to light weight 17", 18" rims. When comparing same manufactured materials in regard to circumference, the smaller rim wins in the rotational mass department.
 
9

98V6

New Member
Oct 28, 2004
43
0
0
45
Baltimore, MD
Nov 2, 2004
#17
  • Nov 2, 2004
  • #17
MarvinMyCat said:
You have to use some amount of common sense when comparing 15, 16" steel rims to light weight 17", 18" rims. When comparing same manufactured materials in regard to circumference, the smaller rim wins in the rotational mass department.
Click to expand...

I agree ! Like I said I might be off with the numbers but but you missed my point all together. My point was diamater means nothing it is rotating mass that matters. Read the entire post before you imply I have a lack of common sense please.

The study I read showed that even though the stock wheel was shorter that because it was heavier it hurt performance more so then the light weight wheel that was a hair taller. It also showed that as the wheels of the same material got larger (thus adding more weight) that the larger and heavier they got the more they hurt performance. The lightest wheel is the best wheel for performance.

Like I said before I want the lightest wheels I can get.
 

marvinmycat

Founding Member
Feb 13, 2002
1,179
0
0
60
Buffalo, NY
Nov 2, 2004
#18
  • Nov 2, 2004
  • #18
OK, but I guess you missed the point of my post wherein maybe I should have said, "One would have to use some amount of common sense..." Not specifically aimed at you. It all comes down to grammar.
 

Ghostalker

Member
Jul 5, 2003
184
0
16
Danbury, CT
Nov 2, 2004
#19
  • Nov 2, 2004
  • #19
yay english language!
 

marvinmycat

Founding Member
Feb 13, 2002
1,179
0
0
60
Buffalo, NY
Nov 2, 2004
#20
  • Nov 2, 2004
  • #20
Yu sade it. Engrish iz da bom!
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Considering widening my rear wheels, would like to verify my thoughts on fitment
  • 2000xp8
  • Jul 9, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
421
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 15, 2026
FastDriver
J
2004 Mustang 3.8L V6 vibrations above 65 MPH and differential leaks
  • joeybuddy96
  • Mar 16, 2026
  • SN95 V6 Mustang Tech
Replies
16
Views
596
SN95 V6 Mustang Tech Jul 14, 2026
joeybuddy96
J
A
Rough idle - cylinder 1 and 6 misfire HELP
  • austindavies935
  • Jul 24, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
12
Views
726
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Jul 24, 2025
gkomo
B
Where to go from here on my build…
  • B0udreaux
  • Jul 14, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
201
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 18, 2026
AeroCoupe
What's your tow rig?
  • LILCBRA
  • May 31, 2026
  • Other Auto Tech
Replies
3
Views
139
Other Auto Tech May 31, 2026
LILCBRA
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 V6 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?