• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Does this porting look legit??

  • Thread starter Thread starter Black331Stang
  • Start date Start date Dec 4, 2003

Black331Stang

Active Member
Apr 29, 2003
1,485
0
36
Long Island, NY
Dec 4, 2003
#1
  • Dec 4, 2003
  • #1
hey, found this on ebay and it looks sweet. i wantted to keep my cobra intake for my 331/347 but everyones telling me itll be too small even with fully ported lower..anyway does this intake and its porting seem ok? tmoss u should jump all over this lol...and do u guys think that this cobra would be good for a stroker or just go with the RPM/RPM II? only gonna be spinning to 6ish. heres teh link:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/e...tegory=36474&item=2446158727#ebayphotohosting

thanks in advance
 

Black331Stang

Active Member
Apr 29, 2003
1,485
0
36
Long Island, NY
Dec 5, 2003
#2
  • Dec 5, 2003
  • #2
anyone?
 

65ShelbyClone

Founding Member
Sep 9, 2000
4,675
38
119
Antelope Valley, SoCal
Dec 5, 2003
#3
  • Dec 5, 2003
  • #3
I think it will work on a stroker and probably pretty well to boot, but I still wouldnt get it. Edelbrock Performers usually go for less than $375 on Ebay and for a little over 400 you could get a new Trick Flow shipped from Summit.
 

rickmazurek

Founding Member
Feb 2, 2002
802
0
0
colorado
Dec 5, 2003
#4
  • Dec 5, 2003
  • #4
I would say no, it looks like someone was just having some fun with a dremel and really didnt know what they were doin. Its not smooth at all and the upper has only been done where you can reach. When you port an upper you have to cut the big part off at the back so you can get inside and do the whole thing, this was obviously not done to this piece. My inexperienced guess is he probabily spent about an hour in his basement doing that hack job.
 

nito88stang

Founding Member
May 23, 2002
2,012
0
46
Fullerton, California
Dec 5, 2003
#5
  • Dec 5, 2003
  • #5
The porting is VERY rough. It indeed looks like a hackjob. I dont know much about runner shape but it doesnt look uniform like in the pics i've seen of tmoss's. In one of the runner you can see the wall between runners is VERY thin, it looks more like he opened the mouth of the runners instead of reshaping them. Lots of flow? maybe, Lots of velocity, i doubt it.
 

Maryland Stang

Active Member
Aug 21, 2002
1,656
30
39
Greenville, NC
Dec 5, 2003
#6
  • Dec 5, 2003
  • #6
Even I can see that 2/6 doesn't even come close to matching between the upper and lower.
 

tmoss

Gettin Wired
Founding Member
Jun 28, 2001
7,153
32
128
Saint Louis, MO
Dec 5, 2003
#7
  • Dec 5, 2003
  • #7
Doesn't look very special to me either - and at $375 with 23 bidders and two days to go, the price is getting up there. Looks like a 1250 gasket port job but I can't see into the runners to see if they were re-shaped (where the boys are seperated fro the men). It will cost you way more than letting me do your lower.
 

BlackFox5.0

Founding Member
Aug 7, 2000
3,514
1
0
Massachusetts
Dec 5, 2003
#8
  • Dec 5, 2003
  • #8
the llower/heads ports don't look ported at all, the injector dip would be almost gone if it was ported...and the turns in the runners would be straighter, i can see the turns....
 

Michael Yount

Mustang Master
Apr 10, 2002
9,039
6
79
Charlotte, NC
Dec 5, 2003
#9
  • Dec 5, 2003
  • #9
Sure is shiny....
 

88STANGCONVERT

Founding Member
Aug 27, 2001
622
0
0
TRI-CITIES, WASHINGTON
Dec 5, 2003
#10
  • Dec 5, 2003
  • #10
I do not know, it looks to much like a semi-polished lower, not ported. If you want a great ported intake, take a look into TMOSS's ported lower. Now that is a port job done the correct way. This is the route that I am going and several have done before me with great results and the price is un-beatable if you ask me. Either way you go I wish you good luck.
 

Black331Stang

Active Member
Apr 29, 2003
1,485
0
36
Long Island, NY
Dec 5, 2003
#11
  • Dec 5, 2003
  • #11
yeah i definitely wasnt getting it, i know someone who was looking at it..thanks for teh help!
 

AxeGrinder30thZ

New Member
May 20, 2003
19
0
0
Pelzer, SC
Dec 5, 2003
#12
  • Dec 5, 2003
  • #12
Looks like it was polished a little bit, but poorly ported. Lots of un-even marks. Looks like he got a dremel and tried to do it best he could. Lower intake looks rough to me...you can see each individual marking.
 

Black331Stang

Active Member
Apr 29, 2003
1,485
0
36
Long Island, NY
Dec 8, 2003
#13
  • Dec 8, 2003
  • #13
damnnn who would pay over $600 (w/shipping) for that thing? that is crazy
 

tmoss

Gettin Wired
Founding Member
Jun 28, 2001
7,153
32
128
Saint Louis, MO
Dec 8, 2003
#14
  • Dec 8, 2003
  • #14
That is truely insane. Nothing like a bidding frenzy to take the logic out. I'll do a much better job for anyone who wants to pay me that much money.
 

Black331Stang

Active Member
Apr 29, 2003
1,485
0
36
Long Island, NY
Dec 8, 2003
#15
  • Dec 8, 2003
  • #15
absolutely stupid to go that high...ebay is all about the looks and the pics. lol
 

93 teal terror

Founding Member
Jul 13, 2001
971
62
69
Durham N.C.
Dec 8, 2003
#16
  • Dec 8, 2003
  • #16
Black331Stang said:
absolutely stupid to go that high...ebay is all about the looks and the pics. lol
Click to expand...
Dont forget they also arent making the cobra intake for the 87-93 anymore....ive seen prices going up lately
 

tmoss

Gettin Wired
Founding Member
Jun 28, 2001
7,153
32
128
Saint Louis, MO
Dec 8, 2003
#17
  • Dec 8, 2003
  • #17
Yeah, but I see them go for $250-300 often in unported condition.
 
M

matm347

Founding Member
Aug 29, 2000
2,056
0
0
Dec 8, 2003
#18
  • Dec 8, 2003
  • #18
I agree, this is probably a first attempt at "porting", if you notice the lower ports were not reshaped correctly, I can see several locations that will cause huge dead spots in velocity. Not worth it one bit!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Upgrading my 347 feedback
  • robo
  • Apr 8, 2018
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
982
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 8, 2018
robo
S
How Does This Combo Look? (fti Cam, By Ed Curtis)
  • stealth886
  • Oct 29, 2016
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
9
Views
6K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Nov 6, 2016
cleanLX
T
Fox No Boost And Stumped
  • TWEECD
  • Aug 12, 2017
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3 4
Replies
63
Views
12K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 31, 2017
TWEECD
T
  • Locked
New Edelbrock Performer RPM II, Mac 70 MM tb and spacer, and Pro M 77mm/30/lb injecor
  • giddyup306
  • Apr 11, 2011
  • Engine and Power Adder
Replies
3
Views
2K
Engine and Power Adder May 2, 2011
91fiveohnotch
9
B
  • Locked
SOLD 1992 Lx 5.0 Convertible - 347, 5-speed Tko500 - Jacksonville, Fl
  • bdg
  • Sep 9, 2012
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
2
Views
5K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Sep 22, 2012
bdg
B
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?