• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

drivability w/e303

  • Thread starter Thread starter huffy9550
  • Start date Start date Aug 14, 2018
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
H

huffy9550

New Member
Aug 14, 2018
10
0
1
21918
Aug 14, 2018
#1
  • Aug 14, 2018
  • #1
HELP! 95 5.0-installed e303 cam ,new springs, new chain and gears, typhoon intake. car now has radical idle, surges, acts like it just stops running while driving!!!! iv,e installed alot of cams and never had these kind of problems, but this is the first time i've done a EFI car, whats wrong??
 

a91what

SendMeUrDataLog
10 Year Member
Apr 6, 2011
10,739
6,720
214
Hillsborough county
Aug 14, 2018
#2
  • Aug 14, 2018
  • #2
Well alot could be wrong..... first off you chose a cam that is NOT EFI friendly, this is not the end of the world however.
Lets start with idle, have you done a base idle reset?
Have you checked for vacuum leaks?
 
H

huffy9550

New Member
Aug 14, 2018
10
0
1
21918
Aug 14, 2018
#3
  • Aug 14, 2018
  • #3
no vac leaks, base idle is 950, i called ford tech line and they said this cam was a good choice, not so huh, i was also told that 94 and 95 EECs can't learn?
 

a91what

SendMeUrDataLog
10 Year Member
Apr 6, 2011
10,739
6,720
214
Hillsborough county
Aug 14, 2018
#4
  • Aug 14, 2018
  • #4
You need a tune, if this were a 87-93 mass air car the ECU could deal with it... The 94-95 ECU strategy is a bit touchier and does not play well with cams without a tune.

there are literally TONS of better cams out there for your application but we were all there before with a letter cam.....
 
H

huffy9550

New Member
Aug 14, 2018
10
0
1
21918
Aug 14, 2018
#5
  • Aug 14, 2018
  • #5
i'm not familiar with tunes. are there specific companies that do these?
 

a91what

SendMeUrDataLog
10 Year Member
Apr 6, 2011
10,739
6,720
214
Hillsborough county
Aug 14, 2018
#6
  • Aug 14, 2018
  • #6
Now hang tight for a little bit and see what some other guys chime in with, they may have some insight that could help with the problem that i am not aware of.

Have you tried our no start check list?? a search in the bar up top will bring it up. Very comprehensive go through it step by step
 
H

huffy9550

New Member
Aug 14, 2018
10
0
1
21918
Aug 14, 2018
#7
  • Aug 14, 2018
  • #7
really don't want to do another cam, would love to just make this car drivable again
 
H

huffy9550

New Member
Aug 14, 2018
10
0
1
21918
Aug 14, 2018
#8
  • Aug 14, 2018
  • #8
where do i find the no start checklist?
 

a91what

SendMeUrDataLog
10 Year Member
Apr 6, 2011
10,739
6,720
214
Hillsborough county
Aug 14, 2018
#9
  • Aug 14, 2018
  • #9
http://forums.stangnet.com/showthread.php?t=698148
 

General karthief

wonder how much it would cost to ship you a pair
Mod Dude
Aug 25, 2016
27,826
10,506
203
polk county florida
Aug 14, 2018
#10
  • Aug 14, 2018
  • #10
This may work better for him
http://forums.stangnet.com/showthread.php?t=698148
94-5 specific info is highlighted,
Did it run good before the cam/intake install? Most times when changing intakes the gasket slips and causes a vacuum leak in the lifter valley, I think there is a intake install thread in the 5.0 tech/how to threads, you can find lots of help in there, the surging idle checklist and the cranks but no start checklist is in there, lots of members contributed to this forum, it's made me look like a genius several times.
 

TOOLOW91

If you're the village idiot what's that make me?
20+ Year Stangneter
Nov 29, 1999
8,481
8,677
234
S.I.NY
Aug 15, 2018
#11
  • Aug 15, 2018
  • #11
Every person I know has had to tune their 94-95 with a cam in it . The ecu in those cars just hate anything other then stock . I had a friend while not the best tuning company in the world had American muscle - bama burn him a chip and it fixed his issue .

I’m not sure who else would do a custom remote chip for the car but that is an option .
 

Dan02gt

mazing how much gas smell came from that tiny hole
20+ Year Stangneter
Mar 2, 2003
909
415
113
Greenville, NC
Aug 15, 2018
#12
  • Aug 15, 2018
  • #12
You should be running a cam with a lobe separation of 114* or better. The e cam is 110* and a 94-95 is going to HATE that. I've seen 94-95s with a Comp XE264HR-14 and a Steeda #19 that both drove like stock with no tune. Do all the stuff mentioned here to try to get it to run the best you can, but a E cam is probably never going to have good drivablity in your car.
 

mikestang63

SN Certified Technician
Aug 27, 2012
11,606
8,859
214
In the garage
Aug 15, 2018
#13
  • Aug 15, 2018
  • #13
if it were ME, I would put the stock cam back in and install a set of 1.7 rockers. You are going to spend a few hundred bucks on a tune to try and make a poor cam work. Please tell me you don't have stock heads, throttle body, exhaust, MAF., rear end gears.
 
H

huffy9550

New Member
Aug 14, 2018
10
0
1
21918
Aug 16, 2018
#14
  • Aug 16, 2018
  • #14
Stock heads,BBK 70mm throttle boby, 120gal fuel pump, BBK cold air, stock MAF pypes h pipe no cats,flowmaster h pipe back. typhoon intake, 410 gears, ran great before the cam change. I've had the car since 1997, only has 68000 miles. I had American Muscle make a bama chip I can tell a slight difference with the chip but still runs like crap.smells really rich. Like i said i've not worked on an efi car before, I was a Ford dealer master tech back in the day. all set out to do was to get it into the 14's at the local drag strip. wish id never touched it!!!!
 
H

huffy9550

New Member
Aug 14, 2018
10
0
1
21918
Aug 16, 2018
#15
  • Aug 16, 2018
  • #15
Do you guys think if i get rid of the e303 it would cure these problems?
 

a91what

SendMeUrDataLog
10 Year Member
Apr 6, 2011
10,739
6,720
214
Hillsborough county
Aug 16, 2018
#16
  • Aug 16, 2018
  • #16
do you have a check engine light on? have you attepted to pull the codes? a bad sensor can cause all types of issues
 
H

huffy9550

New Member
Aug 14, 2018
10
0
1
21918
Aug 16, 2018
#17
  • Aug 16, 2018
  • #17
Wouldn't that be a bi**h, if it was that simple. No can't pull the codes my ODB2 says it can't connect , i thought that was because of the BAMA chip. Yes check engine light comes and goes
 

VibrantRedGT

"STANGNET'S PENGUIN SMACKER"
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
14,679
424
154
Boca Raton, Florida
Aug 16, 2018
#18
  • Aug 16, 2018
  • #18
Not the best cam for a 94-95 ECC idle. These cars need a cam with a lobe of 113+ and it like split duration not same / same.

Like mentioned you'll have to go through the steps of the Surging Idle Checklist. Too many factors to choose from so we'd be just guessing.
 

Noobz347

Stangnet Facilities Maint Tech... Er... Janitor
Admin Dude
Jan 4, 1985
42,878
21,057
234
Box behind Walmart
Aug 16, 2018
#19
  • Aug 16, 2018
  • #19
huffy9550 said:
Do you guys think if i get rid of the e303 it would cure these problems?
Click to expand...

Asked and answered:

mikestang63 said:
if it were ME, I would put the stock cam back in and install a set of 1.7 rockers. You are going to spend a few hundred bucks on a tune to try and make a poor cam work. Please tell me you don't have stock heads, throttle body, exhaust, MAF., rear end gears.
Click to expand...

huffy9550 said:
Stock heads,BBK 70mm throttle boby, 120gal fuel pump, BBK cold air, stock MAF pypes h pipe no cats,flowmaster h pipe back. typhoon intake, 410 gears, ran great before the cam change.
Click to expand...


There is no planet in which this combo is going to make more power than with the stock cam. With those heads, you have effectively reduced your bottom end grunt and then failed to provide enough air to make use of the top. You now have an un-happy EEC as the cherry on the top.

I would also put it back to stock and then plan my next move more carefully.

Let's break this down:


Stock heads - Arguably the most restrictive piece from the factory
BBK 70mm throttle boby - Dammit boby, you worsened throttle body resolution but still aren't pulling anymore air because of the heads
120gal fuel pump - Um... what?
BBK cold air - Gimmick. Adds exactly ZERO HP
stock MAF - but a 70mm throttle body
pypes h pipe no cats - Zero HP and probably lost some torque due to mish-mash of parts in a tuned exhaust system
flowmaster h pipe back - Zero HP
typhoon intake - Way too big. Minus HP
410 gears - And no top end HP to make use of it

ran great before the cam change - Your mods are slowly killing performance. I would bet you money that you make less power now than it did when it was new... Less than a factory car.

You need a really good plan that includes a package of components that are designed to work together.
 
Reactions: mikestang63

Boostedpimp

20+ Year Stangneter
May 8, 2003
1,451
493
154
NJ
Aug 16, 2018
#20
  • Aug 16, 2018
  • #20
In my opinion a mail tune is going to be ok at best. If it were me in this situation I would just bite the bullet and swap the cam back, upgrade the maf and practice my launches with drag radials to chase those 14s
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

J
MEED HELP!! 86 mustang
  • Jacob0121
  • Jan 23, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
6
Views
292
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 25, 2026
CAMTWO1070
S
Idles great, but stumbles when driving
  • Stang9050
  • Oct 15, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
27
Views
536
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Nov 8, 2025
Mcmahst
A
Engine 04 GT timing chain issue
  • AwesomeX1103
  • Sep 3, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
342
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Nov 5, 2025
Noobz347
R
Engine Fox body doesn’t run hot until I start driving
  • Rose5oh
  • Mar 17, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
947
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jun 7, 2025
limp
D
66 Coupe Progress Thread
  • DTCRAWLEY
  • Apr 19, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
38
Views
636
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Wednesday at 10:27 PM
General karthief
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?