• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

dyno numbers - 95GT

  • Thread starter Thread starter CopMagnet5oh
  • Start date Start date Jun 26, 2004
C

CopMagnet5oh

New Member
Apr 15, 2004
64
0
0
Jun 26, 2004
#1
  • Jun 26, 2004
  • #1
dynoed my car today - 264rwhp/280rwtq, and with that i ran 12.8@106mph a month ago

95 gt with 3.73s.

also, before HCI upgrade i had 222rwhp/278rwtq, and ran 14.0@96mph.

so after all these upgrades i only got 2 pounds of torque more than before ? i was told to use 89 computer and get a kit from pro-m to use it in mine, does it work ? i was told it should be much better that way.

btw - i have gt-40 alum heads/E303/1.72rr/TFS track heat intakes. 70mmtb/75mm mass/cai - long tubes/h with cats/mac catback.
190lph /w adj reg using stock 19lbs.

tell me what u guys think ? healthy or not ?

i honestly want to squeeze out just a little more out of this thing without major mods, i want about 300 at the wheels and i'd be happy.

thanks
- Kons
 

Joe 5.0

Founding Member
Feb 1, 2002
1,184
2
38
Macomb, MI (metro detroit)
Jun 27, 2004
#2
  • Jun 27, 2004
  • #2
Thats a VERY decent mph for only 264rwhp. What kind of dyno was it?

And I wouldnt worry so much about the tq. A 302 naturally aspirated is only going to make so much torque. Noone ever complains about it being low on torque, even stock. Its just that the the torque curve falls off a cliff at 4000 rpm. By making 40rwhp more you are basically extending the tq curve higher in the rpm range, thus allowing for more power and more work to be done (which is what hp is). I'd worry more about your track times & trap speed than the dyno numbers, which are peak only. Compare the hp & tq curves to someone making 300rwhp and see if yours is stronger down low. That could be why its so quick but doesnt make the magical 300.
 

mo_dingo

20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 26, 2003
3,031
2
58
Tucson, AZ
Jun 27, 2004
#3
  • Jun 27, 2004
  • #3
Yep, I completely agree. You basically bumped your shift point from 5000 to 5600 rpm's (Complete guess, but should be close). That extra range means you can stay in each gear longer, which is why you did well at the track.

That q/m time is extremely good for your hp/tq. Can you post a dyno graph? I would love to see it!
Scott
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Jun 27, 2004
#4
  • Jun 27, 2004
  • #4
CopMagnet5oh said:
i honestly want to squeeze out just a little more out of this thing - Kons
Click to expand...

That is exactly what I want from my car too

Later
Grady
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

car wont make the power or run the number, whats wrong?
  • Foxfan88
  • Mar 10, 2007
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
28
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 12, 2007
BlooDReigN
Finally Got Dyno numbers on my combo if anyones interested.
  • go-stang5.0
  • Aug 10, 2005
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
12
Views
1K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Aug 11, 2005
go-stang5.0
Dyno numbers finally!
  • Sleepy McNastee
  • Jul 31, 2004
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
  • 2
Replies
26
Views
1K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Aug 7, 2004
Sleepy McNastee
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?