mr.b said:i have only owned the car about a year. i am the 3rd owner. it is bone stock. intake, headers, cats, all stock stuff. i am curious to see what becomes of this, i know they will be trying to figure it out come monday. i will let you know what the prob. is when i, and they, figure out what it is. the mustang dyno is usually lower and i know it lets a lot of their customers down when they show up expect high numbers. just like the last guy wanting to put down 600 rwhp and only put down 480, with his 408 procharged mustang. everybody is use to dynojet numbers, which i feel are a little high.
GroverDill said:messed up calibration on the dyno.
JBA here in San Diego has a overly friendly dyno as well.
RacEoHolic330 said:And that's at the flywheel too. So it's around 195 stock at the wheels
I'll be the first to throw the flag![]()
mr.b said:yes, it was reading the rpm correctly. also, the mustang dyno website said that with a big gear change you would still only see about a 5% difference.
Speeds8erM-1, if the mustang dyno is easy to get false numbers from, how do you do it? tell me everything so i can match it to what we did.
mr.b said:i have only owned the car about a year. i am the 3rd owner. it is bone stock. intake, headers, cats, all stock stuff. i am curious to see what becomes of this, i know they will be trying to figure it out come monday. i will let you know what the prob. is when i, and they, figure out what it is. the mustang dyno is usually lower and i know it lets a lot of their customers down when they show up expect high numbers. just like the last guy wanting to put down 600 rwhp and only put down 480, with his 408 procharged mustang. everybody is use to dynojet numbers, which i feel are a little high.