• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

dyno results

  • Thread starter Thread starter Paul619
  • Start date Start date Nov 23, 2004
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
P

Paul619

New Member
Aug 19, 2004
83
0
0
Nov 23, 2004
#1
  • Nov 23, 2004
  • #1
Well I just got my car back from the dyno shop.... 255hp and 290tq at the wheels out of a lil 289 not bad right? runs soo much better now and feels smoother. I will post up the graphs later on tonight if I get a chance
 

Stang_1973

Founding Member
Jul 13, 2001
565
9
38
San Antonio, Tx.
Nov 23, 2004
#2
  • Nov 23, 2004
  • #2
Nice numbers. Sweet for a 289.

Whats your setup? Mods, gears, tranny?
 
P

Paul619

New Member
Aug 19, 2004
83
0
0
Nov 23, 2004
#3
  • Nov 23, 2004
  • #3
-Weiand Stealth Intake
-Holly 650 carb
-Doug Thorley Headers
-Flowmaster dual exhaust with crossover pipe
-MSD Digital 6 box w/coil
-MSD Pro Billet distributor
-Electric fan/removed original
-Taylor plug wires
-High performance cam .540 lift .260 duration
-Trick flow roller rockers 1.7to1
-Trick flow twisted wedge heads
-Auburn posi rear end with 3.25 gears


they guys at the shop were telling me that my car is waaay too small it is pulling like 2.5 in of vac. from like 3500 rpm and almost 3 at 5500rpm. and yeah it is a stock bore and stroke on the thing and a stock tranny
 

12sec67

Active Member
Oct 6, 2003
1,301
1
36
San Diego, Ca
Nov 23, 2004
#4
  • Nov 23, 2004
  • #4
hey paul ... sorry man, no go on the rims. my brother buying them off me.

good #'s though
 
P

Paul619

New Member
Aug 19, 2004
83
0
0
Nov 23, 2004
#5
  • Nov 23, 2004
  • #5
rich you know of anyone else here in town that has some wheels? i need to get some the ones i have are hideous...

well the stang is back in the shop something is up with the tranny. just got stuckon the freeway and had it towed up there grrrrrrrrrrrrrrr This car is really starting to piss me off
 

Mizel

New Member
Apr 20, 2003
47
0
0
Colorado
Nov 23, 2004
#6
  • Nov 23, 2004
  • #6
Hey Paul,

You got stock heads or are they alum? I just built my 289 and got it running. Im really curious what itll put down.
 
R

Rumble

New Member
Nov 15, 2004
21
0
0
Ontario, Canada
Nov 23, 2004
#7
  • Nov 23, 2004
  • #7
Paul619 said:
-Trick flow roller rockers 1.7to1
-Trick flow twisted wedge heads
Click to expand...

He said he has Twisted Wedge heads... which is why his little 289 makes SERIOUS power! It's all about the heads. That should easily be a 13-second car.
 
P

Paul619

New Member
Aug 19, 2004
83
0
0
Nov 23, 2004
#8
  • Nov 23, 2004
  • #8
Rumble said:
He said he has Twisted Wedge heads... which is why his little 289 makes SERIOUS power! It's all about the heads. That should easily be a 13-second car.
Click to expand...
yeah the heads help..... I know this from vw racing, but ring seal is the concern with me right now. What kind of numbers have you seen from other 289s? just wondering. what do you thin this is at the flywheel?
 

Edbert

Founding Member
Jul 13, 2002
3,548
32
109
Austin TX
Nov 24, 2004
#9
  • Nov 24, 2004
  • #9
Rumble said:
It's all about the heads. That should easily be a 13-second car.
Click to expand...
Heads make the package alright, put a big arse cam in there without em and it'll fall on its face. With 255rwhpalmost 300rwtq low 13s should be no problem at all assuming he can get it hooked up.

Paul, what tranny and rear-end you running? Those figures are really impressive if you've got a 9 under there. Was the torque curve flat?
 

allcarfan

The Answer Man
Founding Member
Apr 8, 2001
2,458
1
56
North Atlanta
Nov 24, 2004
#10
  • Nov 24, 2004
  • #10
cool numbers. i think your engine has more potential too! I know you wouldnt want to do this, but comp cams would suggest a little better cam and rocker ratio. I think you might be a little overcammed...especially with the big rockers.

I know you are please with those numbers though! I know I would be!
 

Mizel

New Member
Apr 20, 2003
47
0
0
Colorado
Nov 24, 2004
#11
  • Nov 24, 2004
  • #11
Sorry about that stupid question Paul......to many hours in front of the computer makes the vision blur.

Well I also decided to see what kind of power I could pull out of a 289. Im not sure on some of the specifics about the short block because I had it machined and assembled by a shop that went under. But heres what I do know:

289 bored 40 over
Comp cam (not sure which model, but equivalent to the one that comes with the Edelbrock Perf. RPM package)
Crane roller rockers
Edelbrock performer RPM heads
Edelbrock air gap intake
Edelbrock 650 carb
Hooker comp headers
MSD Pro Billet Distributor
MSD wires
posi with 3.88 gears

Is all this stuff about equivalent to what youve got? Just looking to see what mine might put down.

thanks
 

12sec67

Active Member
Oct 6, 2003
1,301
1
36
San Diego, Ca
Nov 24, 2004
#12
  • Nov 24, 2004
  • #12
Paul619 said:
rich you know of anyone else here in town that has some wheels? i need to get some the ones i have are hideous...

well the stang is back in the shop something is up with the tranny. just got stuckon the freeway and had it towed up there grrrrrrrrrrrrrrr This car is really starting to piss me off
Click to expand...

STILL LOOKIN FOR YA
 
P

Paul619

New Member
Aug 19, 2004
83
0
0
Nov 24, 2004
#13
  • Nov 24, 2004
  • #13
I have stock bore on my block. if you are 40 over i dont have a clue....

I dont know if I am over cammed i still need to post the graphs, but they are in the car and it isnt at my house..... If i had a bigger carb i would get another 20 hp out of in no questions. they told me to run a 700-725 with the amount of vaccum that i was pulling from 3500 on


Mizel said:
Sorry about that stupid question Paul......to many hours in front of the computer makes the vision blur.

Well I also decided to see what kind of power I could pull out of a 289. Im not sure on some of the specifics about the short block because I had it machined and assembled by a shop that went under. But heres what I do know:

289 bored 40 over
Comp cam (not sure which model, but equivalent to the one that comes with the Edelbrock Perf. RPM package)
Crane roller rockers
Edelbrock performer RPM heads
Edelbrock air gap intake
Edelbrock 650 carb
Hooker comp headers
MSD Pro Billet Distributor
MSD wires
posi with 3.88 gears

Is all this stuff about equivalent to what youve got? Just looking to see what mine might put down.

thanks
Click to expand...




 

allcarfan

The Answer Man
Founding Member
Apr 8, 2001
2,458
1
56
North Atlanta
Nov 24, 2004
#14
  • Nov 24, 2004
  • #14
im surprised they advised you to get a bigger carb, but I guess the vacuum numbers dont lie.

What rear and trans are you running?
We can better estimate your flywheel hp if we knew that.
 
P

Paul619

New Member
Aug 19, 2004
83
0
0
Nov 24, 2004
#15
  • Nov 24, 2004
  • #15
I have a c4 and 3.25 gears

allcarfan said:
im surprised they advised you to get a bigger carb, but I guess the vacuum numbers dont lie.

What rear and trans are you running?
We can better estimate your flywheel hp if we knew that.
Click to expand...
 

TrickStang37

New Member
Oct 17, 2004
292
0
0
Nov 25, 2004
#16
  • Nov 25, 2004
  • #16
what cam are you running? is the .540 lift with the 1.7's or 1.6's? Whats the duration #'s at .05? Either way I dont think your over cammed. your motor needs ALOT more air if your pulling vacuum at WOT, the heads are asking for more air. I could see you makin upwards of 280+rwhp/310+rwtq, most likely more still.
 
P

Paul619

New Member
Aug 19, 2004
83
0
0
Nov 25, 2004
#17
  • Nov 25, 2004
  • #17
the .540 lift is with the 1.7 rockers and the duration is like 260

TrickStang37 said:
what cam are you running? is the .540 lift with the 1.7's or 1.6's? Whats the duration #'s at .05? Either way I dont think your over cammed. your motor needs ALOT more air if your pulling vacuum at WOT, the heads are asking for more air. I could see you makin upwards of 280+rwhp/310+rwtq, most likely more still.
Click to expand...
 

SadbutTrue

Founding Member
May 1, 2002
2,391
4
49
Thousand Oaks, California
Nov 25, 2004
#18
  • Nov 25, 2004
  • #18
like has been said, i dont think your overcammed. There is definitely another 20 horses at the wheels left in that combo, and more torque to boot
 

TrickStang37

New Member
Oct 17, 2004
292
0
0
Nov 25, 2004
#19
  • Nov 25, 2004
  • #19
260 duration @ .05 is an awful lot. are you sure that was @ .05?
 
P

Paul619

New Member
Aug 19, 2004
83
0
0
Nov 25, 2004
#20
  • Nov 25, 2004
  • #20
I didnt build the bottom end so that is what i was told prolly not 050 though not too sure.. might be like a 240 or so still is pretty damn big. starts making power around 3500-4 grand

TrickStang37 said:
260 duration @ .05 is an awful lot. are you sure that was @ .05?
Click to expand...
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

J
Engine 4.6 Running rough at half throttle
  • jake411
  • Aug 3, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
183
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Aug 4, 2026
jake411
J
Suspension Is somethig Wrong Here?
  • Icemanxxxv
  • Jul 11, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
5
Views
169
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 11, 2026
AeroCoupe
D
66 Coupe Progress Thread
  • DTCRAWLEY
  • Apr 19, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
43
Views
1K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 17, 2026
DTCRAWLEY
D
Resolved Three way cat converters..?
  • PonyGTrider
  • Nov 2, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
307
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Nov 2, 2025
PonyGTrider
S
Car shakes when taking off help???
  • STANKYstangs
  • May 10, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
12
Views
416
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- May 27, 2026
LILCBRA
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?