Dyno Results

D

Drews02

New Member

Nov 21, 2004

24

0

0

Dec 10, 2004

#1

• Dec 10, 2004

• #1

2002 Mustang GT

Mods: Accufab 75mm TB, C&L Plenum, MAC CAI Fenderwell Kit, Hooker LT, Diablo Predator, 4:10, U/D Pulleys.

 

Attachments

• HP Run.gif

  66.6 KB · Views: 206

boomshack

New Member

Jun 4, 2004

274

0

0

Southern Cali

Dec 10, 2004

#2

• Dec 10, 2004

• #2

Looking good..all those mods probably netted you 20-25 rwhp. So now you're ready for a centrifugal blower and you'll see some real power...hell forge your internals and you can take this baby to 450 rwhp...some suspension mods may be needed though.

 

M

Mike00GT

Founding Member

Apr 25, 2001

615

0

0

Stoughton, MA

Dec 10, 2004

#3

• Dec 10, 2004

• #3

Is it an automatic? Look at my sig and the #'s I got. I tought your #'s would be a little higher.

 

D

Drews02

New Member

Nov 21, 2004

24

0

0

Dec 10, 2004

#4

• Dec 10, 2004

• #4

Results were from a Dyno Dynamics load bearing dyno. I was told the rwhp numbers would be about 17% less than on a DynoJet....does 17% sound correct.

 

D

Drews02

New Member

Nov 21, 2004

24

0

0

Dec 10, 2004

#5

• Dec 10, 2004

• #5

Mike00GT said:

Is it an automatic? Look at my sig and the #'s I got. I tought your #'s would be a little higher.

Click to expand...

What type of dyno did you dyno it on?

 

Jesus

Banned

May 13, 2003

267

0

0

Woodland Hills, CA

Dec 10, 2004

#6

• Dec 10, 2004

• #6

Sounds right. The guy near hear who has one of those dynos dynoed his bone stock 04 GT and it put down 197 HP.

 

B

billyfe390

New Member

Aug 18, 2003

573

0

0

Dec 10, 2004

#7

• Dec 10, 2004

• #7

Drews02 said:

2002 Mustang GT

Mods: Accufab 75mm TB, C&L Plenum, MAC CAI Fenderwell Kit, Hooker LT, Diablo Predator, 4:10, U/D Pulleys.

Click to expand...

Looks good man. What was the A/F ratio?

 

GTsleeper

New Member

Nov 26, 2003

179

0

0

St.Louis, Missouri

Dec 10, 2004

#8

• Dec 10, 2004

• #8

Makes sense cause I dynoe'd at 255 rwhp on a wideband. Try to see if he will let you do some extra runs and tweak you car with the Diablo. It took 11 runs for me to gain 255 we started with 240 rwhp. After a few adjustments with the fuel and timing I started to push 255rwhp.

 

D

Drews02

New Member

Nov 21, 2004

24

0

0

Dec 10, 2004

#9

• Dec 10, 2004

• #9

GTsleeper said:

Makes sense cause I dynoe'd at 255 rwhp on a wideband. Try to see if he will let you do some extra runs and tweak you car with the Diablo. It took 11 runs for me to gain 255 we started with 240 rwhp. After a few adjustments with the fuel and timing I started to push 255rwhp.

Click to expand...

whats your timing set at?

 

D

Drews02

New Member

Nov 21, 2004

24

0

0

Dec 10, 2004

#10

• Dec 10, 2004

• #10

so if the 17% decrease in rwhp is correct due to the load bearing....246.1 x 1.17= 287.9 then i should see around 287.9 on a dynojet. is this correct?

 

1

1786

New Member

Jan 27, 2004

5

0

0

ESVA

Dec 10, 2004

#11

• Dec 10, 2004

• #11

Your mods are similar to mine.....performance mods: Mac O/R, flowmaster 3ch CB, Steeda pullies & T.A, Mac CAI, Accufab 75mm tb, C&L plenum, Spec stage 1 and aluminum flywheel...Just got rid of the T.A and bought a predator...driveabilty is much better, and its getting better gas mileage

 

GTsleeper

New Member

Nov 26, 2003

179

0

0

St.Louis, Missouri

Dec 10, 2004

#12

• Dec 10, 2004

• #12

Drews02 said:

whats your timing set at?

Click to expand...

I will have to double check at the house I have it all written down. The only problem I am having is my a/f ratio due to the 85mm MAF. As soon as I find one I am going back to the stock size. From 2k to 4k my a/f is high 4k to 7k is perfact.

 

Zinc03GT

New Member

Apr 21, 2004

241

0

0

Mass

Dec 10, 2004

#13

• Dec 10, 2004

• #13

Drews02 said:

so if the 17% decrease in rwhp is correct due to the load bearing....246.1 x 1.17= 287.9 then i should see around 287.9 on a dynojet. is this correct?

Click to expand...

Actually, divide by .87. 246.1/.87 = 282.9. Not sure if it really is an accurate way to figure out your numbers on a dyno-jet, but it would be the correct math formula.

 

M

Mike00GT

Founding Member

Apr 25, 2001

615

0

0

Stoughton, MA

Dec 10, 2004

#14

• Dec 10, 2004

• #14

Drews02 said:

What type of dyno did you dyno it on?

Click to expand...

Dynojet

 

D

Drews02

New Member

Nov 21, 2004

24

0

0

Dec 10, 2004

#15

• Dec 10, 2004

• #15

GTsleeper said:

I will have to double check at the house I have it all written down. The only problem I am having is my a/f ratio due to the 85mm MAF. As soon as I find one I am going back to the stock size. From 2k to 4k my a/f is high 4k to 7k is perfact.

Click to expand...

alright well let me know about the timing b/c id like to see what your running it at between 2k-4k and from 4k-7k on the predator.

 

D

Darkhorse845

Banned

Nov 17, 2004

101

0

0

Las Vegas,Nevada

Dec 11, 2004

#16

• Dec 11, 2004

• #16

Good numbers!

 

GTsleeper

New Member

Nov 26, 2003

179

0

0

St.Louis, Missouri

Dec 11, 2004

#17

• Dec 11, 2004

• #17

Drews02 said:

alright well let me know about the timing b/c id like to see what your running it at between 2k-4k and from 4k-7k on the predator.

Click to expand...

I am still at work so I will PM sometime tomorrow! What a long ass day!