timk Founding Member Jan 8, 2002 156 0 16 st.louis, mo Dec 22, 2003 #21 Dec 22, 2003 #21 andy, are you using a pro-m, too? a 75mm bullet?
RIO5.0 15 Year Member Feb 16, 2001 6,892 8 128 N.H. Dec 22, 2003 #22 Dec 22, 2003 #22 timk said: andy, are you using a pro-m, too? a 75mm bullet? Click to expand... Nope...I have the long Pro-M 77
timk said: andy, are you using a pro-m, too? a 75mm bullet? Click to expand... Nope...I have the long Pro-M 77
final5-0 Mustang Master Apr 6, 2003 6,817 12 79 DFW Texas Dec 26, 2003 #23 Dec 26, 2003 #23 Tim If you really are that rich I would suspect the maf. Is it caled for sc? Most 94-95's start to go lean at about mid rpm range and yours takes off for the rich side so I I think a call to Pro-M is in order. Later Grady
Tim If you really are that rich I would suspect the maf. Is it caled for sc? Most 94-95's start to go lean at about mid rpm range and yours takes off for the rich side so I I think a call to Pro-M is in order. Later Grady
timk Founding Member Jan 8, 2002 156 0 16 st.louis, mo Dec 26, 2003 #24 Dec 26, 2003 #24 "Most 94-95's start to go lean at about mid rpm range and yours takes off for the rich side so I I think a call to Pro-M is in order. Later Grady" grady, that is an interesting idea. i have the calibration sheet that came with the meter. maybe it's the wrong one? maybe a call would help. thanks.
"Most 94-95's start to go lean at about mid rpm range and yours takes off for the rich side so I I think a call to Pro-M is in order. Later Grady" grady, that is an interesting idea. i have the calibration sheet that came with the meter. maybe it's the wrong one? maybe a call would help. thanks.
timk Founding Member Jan 8, 2002 156 0 16 st.louis, mo Dec 26, 2003 #25 Dec 26, 2003 #25 uuuummm....ok, no hate mail. i checked my fuel pressure today with a snap-on gauge, and it was a little higher than i thought. ok, a LOT higher. it was FIFTY TWO pounds without vacuum. do ya think that could be the cause of my ultra-rich dyno results??????
uuuummm....ok, no hate mail. i checked my fuel pressure today with a snap-on gauge, and it was a little higher than i thought. ok, a LOT higher. it was FIFTY TWO pounds without vacuum. do ya think that could be the cause of my ultra-rich dyno results??????
Rootus Officially Addicted Feb 8, 2003 6,659 1 0 Portland, Oregon Dec 26, 2003 #27 Dec 26, 2003 #27 Yeah, that could cause a rich condition, though the EEC should eventually adjust for it some. 39 psi is stock.
Yeah, that could cause a rich condition, though the EEC should eventually adjust for it some. 39 psi is stock.
tmoss Gettin Wired Founding Member Jun 28, 2001 7,153 32 128 Saint Louis, MO Dec 26, 2003 #28 Dec 26, 2003 #28 LOL - ya think?