moneypit94 said:i showed some people your dyno results and mixed reviews, but someone pointed out that the barometric pressure was reading 27.72" and that it should normally be around 30". With a correction factor it would add around 6% being off that much. I don't know i just took the guys word for it.
Anyways, i forgot to ask, what type of fuel were you running?
His words were, either they are dynoing the car on everest or in the middle of a massive hurricane.
All i know is that we were having some really freakish weather this weekend. Check the weather results. It was snowing and raining....then it was sunny....then back to snow and rain.
There were no dyno tricks involved in my dyno. I know all the tricks and didn't use a one of them. If i had i wouldn't post up the sheet with everything showing.
My gas was a 1/2 tank of 91 octane and 4 gallons of 100 unleaded pump gas. If i used straight 91 i would've pulled a few degrees of timing out which might've cost me a little power but nothing crazy. I ran it on the dyno exactly how i run it on the street. I've always mixed my gas a little just to be on the safe side. I could've made up for any loss easy with just letting the car cool down and ice the intake but again i wanted it to reflect the street.
I always thought that the correction factor is what helps keep things on a level playing field for comparing #'s. If i really wanted to impress with #'s i could've done a couple things and it would have easily been closer to 600. I didn't read off of speed which adds quite a bit and i didn't mess with the weather station which can add ALOT depending on how you do it.