• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

Dynoed on motor, and 100 shot

  • Thread starter Thread starter 94gtslow
  • Start date Start date Feb 15, 2006
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
9

94gtslow

Founding Member
Jan 26, 2002
401
0
0
Temple,Texas
Feb 15, 2006
#1
  • Feb 15, 2006
  • #1
Dyno is on motor, then on 100 shot NX wet kit, can't wait to take it to the track then up it to the 150 shot.

http://i49.photobucket.com/albums/f298/94gtslow/johncar2.jpg

 

Attachments

  • johncar2.webp
    29.7 KB · Views: 145
9

94gtslow

Founding Member
Jan 26, 2002
401
0
0
Temple,Texas
Feb 15, 2006
#2
  • Feb 15, 2006
  • #2
Anyone know what times , mph to expect?
 

Swarzkopf

Member
Sep 23, 2004
973
0
16
Pittsburgh
Feb 15, 2006
#3
  • Feb 15, 2006
  • #3
WOW! Nice torque numbers!
 

legalize420

Active Member
May 21, 2005
1,541
1
37
South Florida
Feb 15, 2006
#4
  • Feb 15, 2006
  • #4
do you have 1.6 or 1.7 rockers?
 

v6v8swap

Member
Mar 20, 2004
113
0
16
Oklahoma
Feb 15, 2006
#5
  • Feb 15, 2006
  • #5
Good numbers!!

A couple of things I noticed from the dyno sheet.

1) Nice flat torque and hp curves (especially N/A). Looks like a really good combo.

2) The air/fuel looks pretty lean. Is it tuned to be that way? When the nitrous hit, it went to around 17:1. That sounds pretty lean to me (even when N/A). Maybe that's the way it's tuned? Be careful for the detonation bug. I would hate to see a good running combo hurt some valves and pistons.

Let us know how she does at the track. You already have posted some pretty respectable 60' times, so this thing ought to fly.

Phil
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Feb 15, 2006
#6
  • Feb 15, 2006
  • #6
WOW

That thing outta fly

Does look kinda lean

btw, did you ever get that pm I sent ya?

Grady
 
9

94gtslow

Founding Member
Jan 26, 2002
401
0
0
Temple,Texas
Feb 15, 2006
#7
  • Feb 15, 2006
  • #7
I think it is lean at first because I did not purge it enough
 
9

94gtslow

Founding Member
Jan 26, 2002
401
0
0
Temple,Texas
Feb 15, 2006
#8
  • Feb 15, 2006
  • #8
What should the A/F be on nitrous anyways, I have no clue?

I have it dyno tuned with a superchips chip for N/A, and I just spray over that tune, Or should I spray on the stock tune, it it s flip chip stock computer tunes N/A. theft etcc. 7 different settings.

Pluges are 103's gapped at 35 two steps colder.
 

VibrantRedGT

"STANGNET'S PENGUIN SMACKER"
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
14,679
424
154
Boca Raton, Florida
Feb 15, 2006
#9
  • Feb 15, 2006
  • #9
530TQ on a 100 shot? Wow.
 

Black95GTS

Active Member
Jan 8, 2004
1,644
3
38
Marlborough, MA
Feb 15, 2006
#10
  • Feb 15, 2006
  • #10
I can't WAIT to spray my car this spring, you just got me really fired up! Guess I know where that tax return is going...

As far as A/F goes, that is hugely dependent on the particular engine combo. You have to pull the plugs and check them out... if you are running too lean, then your plugs will have a bluish tinge to the entire plug.

Just right will have the strap showing a slightly bluish tinge, but the rest of spark plug should be normal.

A rich condition is a bit harder to tell, but you are obviously not running too rich!

Adam
 
R

rudeone707

New Member
May 17, 2003
1,829
0
0
Fairfield, Ca
Feb 15, 2006
#11
  • Feb 15, 2006
  • #11
wow, 530 rwtq, thats nice.
 
9

94gtslow

Founding Member
Jan 26, 2002
401
0
0
Temple,Texas
Feb 15, 2006
#12
  • Feb 15, 2006
  • #12
The plugs look new, I dunno.

What times and mph can I expect any guesses?
 

legalize420

Active Member
May 21, 2005
1,541
1
37
South Florida
Feb 15, 2006
#13
  • Feb 15, 2006
  • #13
should be good for 11's. just a guess, somewhere between 115-120
 

Swarzkopf

Member
Sep 23, 2004
973
0
16
Pittsburgh
Feb 15, 2006
#14
  • Feb 15, 2006
  • #14
You should be able to get ~120mph...

Should be good for low-mid 11s with traction.
 

95snoozer

Active Member
Dec 14, 2002
2,572
1
48
RCR
Feb 15, 2006
#15
  • Feb 15, 2006
  • #15
you are going to pop your motor

12.2 at 116

if you are leaving on slicks on the bottle 11.7-8 probably
 
9

94gtslow

Founding Member
Jan 26, 2002
401
0
0
Temple,Texas
Feb 15, 2006
#16
  • Feb 15, 2006
  • #16
pop my motor? what do you mean by that?
 

95snoozer

Active Member
Dec 14, 2002
2,572
1
48
RCR
Feb 15, 2006
#17
  • Feb 15, 2006
  • #17
your car is rediculously lean for the bottle and it will probably be worse on the street when the full load of the car is placed on the motor, a dynojet only loads the car to the weight of the drum.

you need to pull some timing and or maybe go with a bigger fuel jet. Your motor will probably pick up even more power by adding fuel and dropping some timing.

my gt40 setup was around your a/f when I put it on with 16 degrees of timing. I backed it to 14 and raised FP, brought the a/f as close to 13.0 as I could with the 3 dyno passes I had. I picked up 13 hp and 11 foot pounds

I would want my bottle a/f at least at 12.5:1 even if it cost me power.
 

Stangfreak95

add a 4
Founding Member
Nov 4, 2002
3,571
0
0
In your sister. If none, your mom
Feb 15, 2006
#18
  • Feb 15, 2006
  • #18
Yeah 530pds/tq sounds about right. A 100shot pretty much always give you 200pds of torque.

Good numbers. I was a little over yours I'd say, but I blew my engine before I was able to really make a nitrous pass. Anyway long story.

Happy for you. If you stick, you'll be in the 11.5-11.7's I'd say.
 

Yobi1Kanobi

Member
Apr 9, 2003
559
0
16
Feb 15, 2006
#19
  • Feb 15, 2006
  • #19
what fuel pump are you runnin? do you have a booster pump? what inj size?

I ran a 125 dry shot and 30# and i was runnin fat with a dry shot.

I would increase your fuel jet but make sure you can supply it. You might lose a few horses becuz the lean conditions is causing more horsepower but its better to give up a couple and run safer.
 

SWYZ721

Member
Aug 24, 2004
208
0
16
Ann Arbor, MI
Feb 15, 2006
#20
  • Feb 15, 2006
  • #20
Dude, you don't even touch 13.0 afr and you don't even hit 14.0 until ~5200RPM, I'm surprised you didn't blow your motor (or gasket) on the dyno. There is also more power if you add more fuel. It's a win-win.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

TTSaleen's Foxbody Project
  • TTSaleen
  • Apr 28, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
22
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 17, 2026
TTSaleen
Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
46
Views
2K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Thursday at 9:44 PM
Noobz347
3
Eight inches is enough for me...
  • 351MooseStang
  • Nov 27, 2025
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Replies
5
Views
566
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech Mar 2, 2026
Bullitt347
SN Mustang Magnum T56 swap
  • revhead347
  • May 24, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
15
Views
6K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jun 28, 2026
GearHeadGuy
M
Progress Thread mnky99 2001 V6 evap core, ac compressor, heater core replacement
  • mnky99
  • Sep 5, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
496
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Sep 5, 2025
mnky99
M
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?