• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

E7 woes

  • Thread starter Thread starter mustangmods
  • Start date Start date Dec 9, 2005
M

mustangmods

Member
Oct 25, 2005
49
1
8
Dec 9, 2005
#1
  • Dec 9, 2005
  • #1
I'm trying to make a 5.0 HO out of a 1987 5.0 that has the "high swirl" heads, which suc. So my question is: Are they any other heads out there,besides aftermarket, that will compete with the E7? I have a pair of E5CA's and what I believe are E8 truck heads, Will any of these work well a stock HO cam? And one more thing.. What possible harm would be done by using A maf conversion kit with stock heads, stock pistons,HO cam, 70mm TB and egr spacer with matching typhoon intake? would updating to better heads round out the engine more. Kinda got stuck with the 70mm Thottle body.
 

TomCat

New Member
Apr 19, 2005
412
0
0
Utah
Dec 10, 2005
#2
  • Dec 10, 2005
  • #2
Can't you just get ahold of some E7s? They seem to be really cheap.
 
8

86bluecobra

Advanced Member
Dec 20, 2004
4,265
12
69
B.C. Canada
Dec 10, 2005
#3
  • Dec 10, 2005
  • #3
i think guys on budgets get gt-40 explorer heads.
 

Euphoric306

New Member
Apr 5, 2004
905
0
0
Dec 10, 2005
#4
  • Dec 10, 2005
  • #4
86bluecobra said:
i think guys on budgets get gt-40 explorer heads.
Click to expand...


+1 for the explorer heads, ported they can compete fairly well with some of the aftermarkets, at a much lower cost
 
V

v8only

Active Member
Jul 3, 2003
2,378
22
49
Dec 10, 2005
#5
  • Dec 10, 2005
  • #5
70 is way too big. stick with the stock 60 for a stock motor.

the e5 heads are nearly identical to e7 heads.
 
M

mustangmods

Member
Oct 25, 2005
49
1
8
Dec 10, 2005
#6
  • Dec 10, 2005
  • #6
The stock 5.0 motor in 1987 came with a 50mm throttle body with an engine compression of 8:5:1. I've been told the difference is in the heads and the cam and of course the larger TB. So the E5CE should work well. Will it raise the compression?
 
V

v8only

Active Member
Jul 3, 2003
2,378
22
49
Dec 12, 2005
#7
  • Dec 12, 2005
  • #7
mustangmods said:
The stock 5.0 motor in 1987 came with a 50mm throttle body with an engine compression of 8:5:1. I've been told the difference is in the heads and the cam and of course the larger TB. So the E5CE should work well. Will it raise the compression?
Click to expand...


smaller non ho throttle bodies were 58 mm, same as the 86gt engine with the e6 heads. All other 5.0 ho's 87+ got 60mm from the factory. NON 5.0 ho engines likely got the 60, but at a minimum recieved the 58. there was no 50 mm throttle body for the 5.0 engine. the e5 head simply designates the 85 year. the 85 year HO mustang head (possibly the cfi head too? not sure on that) is near identical to the 87 head. it'll have virtually no hp differences.
 
M

mustangmods

Member
Oct 25, 2005
49
1
8
Dec 12, 2005
#8
  • Dec 12, 2005
  • #8
You guys are thinking mustang.. this is 5.0 tech remember. The engine is out of a lincoln, so its pretty much a couger engine. It has a small TB with 14lb/hr injectors. Ford books list it as having a 50mm tb. Not that it matters cause now I have a 65mm. The heads look nothing alike. Set a e5 next to a e7 and look at the chamber style and volume. The e7 has 64cc the e5 looks to have much more volume hence lower comppression.
 
V

v8only

Active Member
Jul 3, 2003
2,378
22
49
Dec 12, 2005
#9
  • Dec 12, 2005
  • #9
very interesting, i was under the impression otherwise. Good info to have.
 
2

2002BLGT

Well-Known Member
Dec 18, 2003
2,945
4
59
Bedford VA
Dec 12, 2005
#10
  • Dec 12, 2005
  • #10
E5s have 69cc chambers E7TEs are 62.1cc E7AE are 64.4cc
 
M

mustangmods

Member
Oct 25, 2005
49
1
8
Dec 12, 2005
#11
  • Dec 12, 2005
  • #11
the exact number on my heads are e7te-pa. I measured the chamber volume using a hypodermic needle once the heads was on a level surface. So at best it was a ball park figure at 64 cc but thanks for the info.
 

Bad92GT

The 5 Minute Plan Man
Jun 10, 2004
492
0
0
SC
Dec 12, 2005
#12
  • Dec 12, 2005
  • #12
i have a set of fully build E7's.. 1.84 valves and hugely ported to no end.. they compete.. compete really well with a high compression motor lol
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

M
Engine Unexplainable Exhaust Pop and Gurgle
  • Mrnissen122
  • Feb 14, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
12
Views
459
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Feb 18, 2026
Noobz347
Engine Catch Can or not?
  • R82148V
  • Mar 4, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
9
Views
308
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 6, 2026
ctandc
C
Engine HCI Upgrade
  • foxbodyclark
  • Jan 21, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
9
Views
472
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jan 26, 2025
Mustang5L5
Resolved Fixing a GT40P Valvetrain nightmare
  • foxbodyclark
  • May 21, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
942
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 24, 2025
limp
J
MEED HELP!! 86 mustang
  • Jacob0121
  • Jan 23, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
6
Views
293
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 25, 2026
CAMTWO1070
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?