• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

early 4.6l B-series head question???

  • Thread starter Thread starter putnam88
  • Start date Start date Dec 8, 2012

putnam88

Member
Aug 2, 2006
102
0
17
tavares
Dec 8, 2012
#1
  • Dec 8, 2012
  • #1
I have a 93' Lincoln mark VIII 4.6L with the B-series heads. My question is this, do you need to run the intake manifold runner control, used to separate the primary and secondary runners. can you eliminate it or will it affect performance in any way. reason being intakes for this motor i have found to insanely priced. and am going to give making my own a shot. and for calculation reasons need to know if i need the imrc plates.

any info would be greatly appreciated

-steven-
 

putnam88

Member
Aug 2, 2006
102
0
17
tavares
Dec 8, 2012
#2
  • Dec 8, 2012
  • #2
i have also made stainless steel plates for the valve covers to convert it to coil on plug and ideas on what would be the best coil to run
 

bhuff30

Founding Member
Dec 11, 2001
6,037
35
129
Olathe KS
Dec 9, 2012
#3
  • Dec 9, 2012
  • #3
I would say yes, you need to keep the plate. The idea of the different runners is to better tune the intake for a wider operating range. This allows the engine to operate on one runner during low speed operation for better low rpm torque and around town manners, and still allows another runner to open up and feed the engine more air the upper rpm range. Often, the runners are a different diameter or length to tune for a certain operating band. Shorter and fatter primaries favor the high revs, while skinnier and longer primaries favor the lower rpm range.

Looks like the B heads have two intake ports for each cylinder cast into the head itself. Sure, you could build a manifold to eliminate the plates and dual runners, but this would likely hurt the low and mid range torque quite a bit.
 

putnam88

Member
Aug 2, 2006
102
0
17
tavares
Dec 9, 2012
#4
  • Dec 9, 2012
  • #4
yeah that's what i was wondering. to give an idea the car is going to be turbo-ed. know i don't how much that changes the factor due to the turbo forcing the air and the engine not being n/a. i had also in my searches found that ford racing makes a delete plate. it is the same width so on and so forth just says removes the shaft and blades. cause i am trying to gain all the info to compile into one basic design for the intake.

thanks for all the help
-steven
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

1
Engine Motor swap from a 2003 Explorer
  • 1996mustang new
  • Oct 9, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
586
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Oct 16, 2025
squeak93
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
848
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
A9L on 94 engine, no priming injector pulse?
  • Wallyman
  • Jun 17, 2024
  • Other Auto Tech
Replies
11
Views
1K
Other Auto Tech Jun 24, 2024
Wallyman
SN Mustang Magnum T56 swap
  • revhead347
  • May 24, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
15
Views
6K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jun 28, 2026
GearHeadGuy
B
For Sale 1986 Capstang (Part Capri & part Mustang) $12,000 Galena, Ohio
  • BubbaG
  • Aug 7, 2022
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
1
Views
2K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Aug 7, 2022
General karthief
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?