where did you get that info from I would love to see that
The first link does not show any info that it is an m112 on that site. I have done a ton of research on this matter before and came up with nothing. I see a lot of "talk" on these forums, but i never see any proof of this. Half of the internet says that blow is a m90 and the other half says its a m112. I check up on eatons history and they say the first ford used eaton m112 was made for the ford lighting, then the 2003 cobra. Nothing in there says anything about the svo blower. If you have like a parts number or something of ford saying its an m112 and not some forum thread I really believe its a m90.
Sigh.....
.....and in closing i'll state there (for the record), is your "definative answer"
Yes they did Roush made a kit fot the 99 with pi heads. Unless you got that kit before 99Sigh.....
And the only reason I didn't run it at the time was because Ford Hadn't finalized a kit for the PI heads yet.
By the looks of things, you may just get your wish yet.Stop clouding the issue with facts, I want to see a good pissing match.
Well....if you’ll read my post, I said “FORD” hadn't finalized a kit yet and the last time I checked, Roush wasn’t Ford. They're an aftermarket company that have joint ventures with the Ford and build parts and performance cars based on their platforms, much in the same respect that Saleen has done over the years. Roush has only recently climbed further into bed with Ford over the last couple of years with the retirement of John Coletti in late-2004 and the disbanded of SVT (Special Vehicle Team) in mid-2006. Oh....and I don’t consider paying $8,200 for a 2V Roush supercharger kit a very cost effective alternative, do you?Yes they did Roush made a kit fot the 99 with pi heads. Unless you got that kit before 99
I'm not trying to be an ass about this, but I dont believe 50% of the crap on any forums. Who knows maybe ford made there own blower. Hey if 5.0 mag said it was a m90 and did not correct them selfs later doesnt that mean that they were right? Theres still no real proof from places like ford or eaton about this..
Of course not, why would you....I just shattered your initial theory all to hell. But I have to say, for someone who doesn’t car, you sure like to argue the point!If your, right your. If i'm wrong what ever I dont care at this point.
Thankfully, the original poster wasn't looking to make huge amounts of power with a blower. He wanted a nice entry level system that would put him in the 300-350rwhp range....and what do you know, that's about where the FRPP/SVO kit will put you.The svo blower sucks next to the other types of power adders out there TURBOS, KB, ProCharger, vortec, and No2. That svo doesnt even come close to anyone of these.
Well, that wasn't the "main" question, but since I've already answered your previous question, you may feel free to change your wording around to make it look that way.Anyways back to the main question. It would be great if some one made a kit for the 03-04 Cobra m112 blower for the 2v.
The only advantage a custom M112 kit utilizing a blower based from a Lightning/Cobra based M112 might have over the FRPP/SVO kit would be the addition of an inercooler. There's physically no way to adapt any sort of air/air or air/water cooler to the kit, like could be done with a "custom" set up. That being said, what a lot of users are doing is adding water/methanol injection to their existing FRPP/SVO kits and pulling better numbers out of them. The blowers themselves can also be ported, the same as a stand alone M112 and the runners and inlet can be ported and/or extrude honed to improve flow levels as well.There all over the place on ebay, craigslist ect... for very cheap prices. Also you would able to add an intercooler, bigger and better plenum/ throttle body, and also you would be able to port the damn thing. Doing the m112 this way would be a greater setup over the svo right??
By the looks of things, you may just get your wish yet.
You are partially correct. There is an instal kit for the blower as picutred in the photographs in the link http://briefcase.yahoo.com/bc/bramrs...ase.yahoo.com/ What they failed to initially was create one for the returnless fuel system I believe. This was easily remedied, but it can be a PITA for someone looking for a "complete" bolt on application. I do believe they're fully available now though.Please correct me if I am wrong.
I have read the other threads about the FRRP and as of right now, the FRRP blower will fit a 99+ stang (the one made for 99+) but Ford never came out with their "install kit". However the blower will still work if you do a few minor things like (please add to list):
new injectors (what size?)
new fuel pump (what size, can KB's boost a pump work?)
new plugs (what kind)
tune
new alt bracket
redoing fuel rails
does the returnless fuel system have to be changed to a return style
other?
Thanks
The way to tell the difference between the M112 and M90 is the size/depth...the M90 isn't as deep as the M112.
My FRPP Supercharger is a M112...i've had it next to a M90 and its longer.
There is a company who makes a kit to fit the Cobra blower to a 2V but its expensive.
THE FRPP/SVO Positive Displacement Supercharger utilizes 112 cubic inches of displacement.....PERIOD!!! Not 90....not 111....not 113, but 112
I wasn't trying to make you look like an ass, but you just didn't seem like you were getting it....so I broke it down in step, by step terms for all to understand. Don't take offence, I wasn't singling you out. All of my tech posts are always long winded and usually very thorough....ask anybody here who's ever had to read through one.THANKS FOR PUTTING IT THAT SIMPLE FOR ALL TO UNDER STAND.
I wasnt calling anyone out! I just wanted a simple answer thats it. Wow no more long ass post to make me look like an ass please!thanks for all the info.
All of my tech posts are always long winded and usually very thorough....ask anybody here who's ever had to read through one.
wow...the fighting continues over this blowerPeople put down something they know nothing about. Why Instant boost, reliablity, cheap, so far great for me
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?