• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Ebay CAI

  • Thread starter Thread starter bsk116
  • Start date Start date Sep 5, 2011

bsk116

New Member
Mar 29, 2011
19
0
1
Sep 5, 2011
#1
  • Sep 5, 2011
  • #1
Have any members purchased and installed one of these intakes? http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/e...id=p1702440.m1253&item=130570840298&viewitem=
The price is right, $60, or is it junk?
A new BBK CAI with non mass air adapter for my 1987 GT is about $200.
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,164
17,860
224
Massachusetts
Sep 5, 2011
#2
  • Sep 5, 2011
  • #2
Stock with stock setup, ditch the silencer, install a drop in panel K&N filter and call it a day.
 

bsk116

New Member
Mar 29, 2011
19
0
1
Sep 5, 2011
#3
  • Sep 5, 2011
  • #3
The GT I bought is completely stock EXCEPT wheels and the "March" brand CAI. I do not have the stock intake or I would heed your advice.
 

wythors

Get off my lawn!!!
Founding Member
May 17, 2000
2,277
35
69
C Addle
Sep 5, 2011
#4
  • Sep 5, 2011
  • #4
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/1986...r_Truck_Parts_Accessories&hash=item19c14e002a

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/1986...r_Truck_Parts_Accessories&hash=item2eb3f950d8

Here ya go. Ask them if they'll combine shipping.
 

zookeeper

Founding Member
Aug 25, 2001
3,415
63
109
Rogue River, Oregon
Sep 5, 2011
#5
  • Sep 5, 2011
  • #5
I always wondered how something that allows the engine to breathe hot, underhood air could possibly be called a "cold air intake". I've seen several tests proving they don't work and actually reduce power, yet still people buy them. I'd shop ebay for a used stocker if I were you.
 

bsk116

New Member
Mar 29, 2011
19
0
1
Sep 6, 2011
#6
  • Sep 6, 2011
  • #6
Thanks, I'll try my local junk yard.
I can see why an under hood CAI would be less effective but the fender well intake should perform as well, if not better, than the stock intake and it looks better.
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,164
17,860
224
Massachusetts
Sep 6, 2011
#7
  • Sep 6, 2011
  • #7
bsk116 said:
but the fender well intake should perform as well, if not better, than the stock intake and it looks better.
Click to expand...

That's the common misconception right there.

There are plenty of other areas of restriction that are tighter than the intake box....ie throttle body, heads, MAF, intake, etc.

If you had a modified 347 with a very free flowing intake setup, a modified intake tube setup would be necessary.

But on a stock 5.0...the intake box is the least of your concerns at this point.
 

VibrantRedGT

"STANGNET'S PENGUIN SMACKER"
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
14,679
424
154
Boca Raton, Florida
Sep 6, 2011
#8
  • Sep 6, 2011
  • #8
This is an Ebay cold air kit. It was cheaper to buy the red hose CAI on Ebay then buy individually at the time. I think I paid $59 plus shipping. It has the fender bend portion but I chucked that. I just want the color hoses and chrome pipe.

This is a 347 Stroker motor.

 

Attachments

  • Motor12-29-05.webp
    47.6 KB · Views: 163

Noobz347

Stangnet Facilities Maint Tech... Er... Janitor
Admin Dude
Jan 4, 1985
42,893
21,073
234
Box behind Walmart
Sep 6, 2011
#9
  • Sep 6, 2011
  • #9
This:



For This:



 

Flavadave4

Active Member
Nov 28, 2003
1,044
21
49
Utica, NY
Sep 6, 2011
#10
  • Sep 6, 2011
  • #10
I would suggest doing what Mustang5L5 said, the stock intake tube is pulls air out of the fender and will work just fine.
 

Maryland Stang

Active Member
Aug 21, 2002
1,656
30
39
Greenville, NC
Sep 7, 2011
#11
  • Sep 7, 2011
  • #11
Even without the snorkel hose and front scoop the March is still a cold air intake. Why are you removing it?
 

bsk116

New Member
Mar 29, 2011
19
0
1
Sep 9, 2011
#12
  • Sep 9, 2011
  • #12
Maryland Stang said:
Even without the snorkel hose and front scoop the March is still a cold air intake. Why are you removing it?
Click to expand...

Your right. Call me crazy but it sounds and feels like the March is restricting air flow. I have not checked to see if the filter is dirty as a possible culprit.
The reason for removing is because it looks cheap. I realize a CAI will net very modest hp gains, but eventually over time I would like to dress up the engine bay.
At this point in time my only performance additions are the CAI and cat back exhaust.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

G
2006 Mustang GT o2 Sensor Wiring Issue Car Bogging/Choking
  • GCantero93
  • Sep 5, 2025
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech
Replies
4
Views
799
2005 - 2009 Specific Tech Sep 6, 2025
Noobz347
Engine BBK Cold Air Kit Rework
  • AeroCoupe
  • Apr 18, 2023
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Apr 30, 2023
AeroCoupe
For Sale 3-owner 1987 Mustang GT, $18K obro, Lancaster CA
  • Bill Cool
  • Oct 6, 2024
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
4
Views
2K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Oct 13, 2024
nickyb
E
Finished my Fox Hydroboost Install - Tips
  • Engineer Duane
  • Apr 9, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 5, 2025
Engineer Duane
E
For Sale 94 Cobra 408w AOD Project For Sale
  • Labora
  • Oct 11, 2024
  • SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04)
Replies
1
Views
1K
SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04) Apr 7, 2025
Labora
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?