• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Edelbrock Pro Flo XT What Are Your Thoughts?

  • Thread starter Thread starter armand67Fstback
  • Start date Start date Jul 16, 2009

armand67Fstback

Member
Oct 30, 2007
146
1
19
Jul 16, 2009
#1
  • Jul 16, 2009
  • #1
Hello everyone, I wanted to get some input on the Edelbrock Pro Flo XT PN 35273 from the EFI experts on here. Is it worth the $3400 to go Edelbrock EFI or are there other EFI systems in that price range that are less $ and just as good? Thanks for your input.
 

coolblue65

Founding Member
Jul 26, 1999
1,224
2
39
Algonquin, IL
Jul 16, 2009
#2
  • Jul 16, 2009
  • #2
I have seen this and have been interested too, it kind of reminds me of a Chevy LT4 intake, and seems to be a much better design then any of the other ford 5.0 style intakes. Plus I think it just looks cool and different.

I suppose from what I always read on here is that Edelbrock software is probably going to be the weakness, but then again I really don't know. But if that is the case you could just buy the intake and run a FAST system or something along those lines.

Try it and let us know how it is!
 

tx65coupe

Active Member
Nov 29, 1999
1,551
1
37
Jul 17, 2009
#3
  • Jul 17, 2009
  • #3
I don't think it is worth 3500 bucks. I would just put a 5.0 EFI setup on it if you want to convert to EFI. Thats just my thoughts on it.
 

Tubo(2-bo)

Member
Mar 25, 2004
279
0
16
Ft Walton Beach FL.
Jul 18, 2009
#4
  • Jul 18, 2009
  • #4
I'd think unless you want a"old school" look for a show car or have an engine not readily adaptable to EECIV, you'll be much better off sticking to ECCIV. Buy a harness from fordfuelinjection.com, using hardware like I have is easy to find. All the foxbody guy's have already tested every part you can think of, no need to re-invent the wheel.
$3400 can buy lotsa other stuff, less ya just want to be different.
 

blown65

Founding Member
Jul 7, 1999
1,938
4
39
Queen Creek Arizona
Jul 18, 2009
#5
  • Jul 18, 2009
  • #5
I like the massflo and the one other that looks like a demon carb with injectors. Keeps that old look without a modern intake. Its the one thing I dont like is the 5.0 intakes on a classic, unless its a sheetmetal one or something.

For the life of me I cant remember the carb/EFI setup.


I love this, just wish it wasnt so much money.
Dynaformance Fuel Injection
 

tx65coupe

Active Member
Nov 29, 1999
1,551
1
37
Jul 19, 2009
#6
  • Jul 19, 2009
  • #6
That Dynaformance setup does look cool.
 
6

68EFIvert

Member
Jan 13, 2007
639
0
17
Camas, Washington
Jul 19, 2009
#7
  • Jul 19, 2009
  • #7
blown65 said:
I love this, just wish it wasnt so much money.
Dynaformance Fuel Injection
Click to expand...

I have been thinking that intake would look great with a turbo setup. Fabricate an inlet pipe that would feed into the individual throttle bodies. I don't know if it would work any better but it sure would look cool!
 

armand67Fstback

Member
Oct 30, 2007
146
1
19
Jul 19, 2009
#8
  • Jul 19, 2009
  • #8
blown65 said:
I like the massflo and the one other that looks like a demon carb with injectors. Keeps that old look without a modern intake. Its the one thing I dont like is the 5.0 intakes on a classic, unless its a sheetmetal one or something.

For the life of me I cant remember the carb/EFI setup.


I love this, just wish it wasnt so much money.
Dynaformance Fuel Injection
Click to expand...

I agree with you on this one, I am not a fan of the Fox EFI intakes in a Classic Mustang Engine Bay. The Performer RPM II in Black is not too bad looking though.

I have a 91 Fox GT that I can get EFI parts from, but depending on unexpected expenses, I may end up using them since parts are plentiful and moderately priced for those cars.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
851
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
P
rear Impact absorbers.
  • Praetorious
  • May 4, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
142
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 5, 2026
Praetorious
P
5
Foxbody Intro
  • 5.0Sucio
  • May 26, 2026
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
1
Views
108
The Welcome Wagon May 26, 2026
Noobz347
T
Service Fluid Recommendations for 2015 Paxton Supercharged GT
  • ThotTrap
  • Aug 25, 2025
  • 2015 - 2023 (S550) Mustang -General/Talk
Replies
0
Views
131
2015 - 2023 (S550) Mustang -General/Talk Aug 25, 2025
ThotTrap
T
M
Resolved 1988 Foxbody - Overheating Summer
  • MDrisc
  • Oct 26, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
16
Views
652
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Friday at 12:37 PM
fasterthangas
F
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?