• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

efi intake for more low end torque

  • Thread starter Thread starter mred03gt
  • Start date Start date Aug 20, 2007

mred03gt

New Member
Dec 10, 2003
33
0
0
Aug 20, 2007
#1
  • Aug 20, 2007
  • #1
Hi Guys,

I am looking for an intake compromise for my 342 listed in my signature. I am shifting at 6500 and the top end is fine. But the thing is a dog down low with the TFS R. I don't want to totally choke the top end, but I have got to get some more get up and go back. Any ideas? I have tfs track heat and cobra, but I think those might be too small.

Thanks
Scott
 

ninety15.0

New Member
Mar 10, 2004
1,336
0
0
Aug 20, 2007
#2
  • Aug 20, 2007
  • #2
Well i dont know if there is a lot you can do in a situation like this. Perhaps you may be better off advancing the cam 4-6* to gain some of that low end grunt. I think that throwing a cobra intake on there is a bad idea. The street heat would be a decent option...but like you said you are probably going to drop that shift point back to about 6k by doing the swap! good luck man
 

cenok is family

15 Year Member
Jun 25, 2003
1,409
69
79
Norman, Ok
Aug 20, 2007
#3
  • Aug 20, 2007
  • #3
aint nothing a little 100 - 150 shot can't fix.
 

rj95svt

Member
Jan 11, 2007
422
0
16
Hayden, AL
Aug 20, 2007
#4
  • Aug 20, 2007
  • #4
What kind of torque converter are you running? If your running a stock converter it is going to feel like a dog in the lower rpm's. A combo like yours will need atleast a 3,000-3,500 stall to work well. Another option may be a 4R70W gear set. I am unsure of the ratios but if IIRC the 4R70W has a lower first and second gear ratios but I don't have a auto so I haven't looked that closely at them.
 

mred03gt

New Member
Dec 10, 2003
33
0
0
Aug 20, 2007
#5
  • Aug 20, 2007
  • #5
Thanks guys,

I am running a 3000 stall converter, but maybe it could use a little more. I did not want more than 3000 because I still drive the car on the street sometimes. I am looking at changing the gear set. 1st in the aode is 2.40 and 1st in the 4r70w is 2.84.
I should have changed the gears when I rebuilt the transmission in May, but as usual I did not think ahead. I was hoping there was a compromise that would beat the laws of physics.

Thanks again,

Scott
 

tmoss

Gettin Wired
Founding Member
Jun 28, 2001
7,153
32
128
Saint Louis, MO
Aug 20, 2007
#6
  • Aug 20, 2007
  • #6
Try the track heat - all it will cost is a set of gakets and some time.
 

rj95svt

Member
Jan 11, 2007
422
0
16
Hayden, AL
Aug 21, 2007
#7
  • Aug 21, 2007
  • #7
I didn't see it in the sig so I figured I would mention it but I didn't see anyone building a combo like that without a converter.

+1 on the track heat. If you got it'll only cost you a set of gaskets and if you don't like it it only cost about 20 dollars and a few hours. I don't know anything about the R series intake. How does it compare with the holley systemax?
 

enyawix

Member
Dec 18, 2005
507
0
19
127.0.0.1
Aug 21, 2007
#8
  • Aug 21, 2007
  • #8
the TFS R runners are very short. maybe too short. short runners make crap torque and power down low. like less than 3000 rpm
 

mred03gt

New Member
Dec 10, 2003
33
0
0
Aug 21, 2007
#9
  • Aug 21, 2007
  • #9
I am going to put the track heat on this weekend. It seems like the easiest thing at the moment to do. Hopefully, it will help. I don't want to change the gears or add more converter right now. It seems, I am doomed to always have a miss-matched combo. Thanks for the help.

Scott
 

rj95svt

Member
Jan 11, 2007
422
0
16
Hayden, AL
Aug 21, 2007
#10
  • Aug 21, 2007
  • #10
The track heat won't be a total mismatch but will not be optimum either. From everything I read the Holley is a great intake and works really well on stroker and blower applications. It has longer runners but they are pretty big and flow well. I'm not sure if it will be the best but I think it's a option. Check out this page on another site it has plenty of dyno comparisons between intakes. This page and page three of the same thread has some intresting info.

http://www.streetstangs.net/showthread.php?t=7625&page=2
 

ninety15.0

New Member
Mar 10, 2004
1,336
0
0
Aug 21, 2007
#11
  • Aug 21, 2007
  • #11
Thats a really interesting thread. I was amazed at how well the Gt-40 family performed. Especially in the more streetable rpms up to about 4000. Its no surprise that the track heat and performer rpm intakes made bigger power above 5k but up til that point they were pretty equal. Good stuff.
 

rj95svt

Member
Jan 11, 2007
422
0
16
Hayden, AL
Aug 21, 2007
#12
  • Aug 21, 2007
  • #12
Yeah tmoss has some dyno data on his website too that is very helpful on intakes.
 

tmoss

Gettin Wired
Founding Member
Jun 28, 2001
7,153
32
128
Saint Louis, MO
Aug 21, 2007
#13
  • Aug 21, 2007
  • #13
rj95svt said:
This page and page three of the same thread has some intresting info.

http://www.streetstangs.net/showthread.php?t=7625&page=2
Click to expand...

I got a chuckle, everyone of those graphics is from my site............
 

cenok is family

15 Year Member
Jun 25, 2003
1,409
69
79
Norman, Ok
Aug 21, 2007
#14
  • Aug 21, 2007
  • #14
after looking at those flow charts, i now have even more love for my cobra intake!
 
R

red95gtconvert

New Member
May 29, 2006
382
0
0
Ponca city, OK
Aug 21, 2007
#15
  • Aug 21, 2007
  • #15
cenok is family said:
after looking at those flow charts, i now have even more love for my cobra intake!
Click to expand...


Love mine too, it really woke my engine up
 
V

v8only

Active Member
Jul 3, 2003
2,378
22
49
Aug 22, 2007
#16
  • Aug 22, 2007
  • #16
just some interesting info here.

my friend runs a stock 5.0 bottom end, with afr 165's, custom cam, and an rpm2 intake.

He wanted to see what an explorer intake could do, so he fully ported an explorer intake, and swapped it on, and took off the rpm2. He gained torque, and brought the power band into a MUCH more useable form. This time he wasn't making all his power up top, it was much more spread out. He did lose a few hp (like 7) but that isn't till the very very top, and it may be able to be tuned out. He's convinced the ported explorer is a better intake for a combo like his.

However, you're definetly making more power than him, and a cobra intake is gonna kill you
 

rj95svt

Member
Jan 11, 2007
422
0
16
Hayden, AL
Aug 22, 2007
#17
  • Aug 22, 2007
  • #17
tmoss said:
I got a chuckle, everyone of those graphics is from my site............
Click to expand...

I knew I saw it all before. I just didn't realize it was all from your site..lol!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

351W/5.8 EFI intake manifolds fading away...
  • Ryno5150
  • Jan 13, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
506
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 7, 2026
nickyb
J
Lost low end torque
  • JJ's90fox
  • Jun 12, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
22
Views
735
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 5, 2025
Methodical
Fox Xtremely high fuel consumption
  • PonyGTrider
  • Apr 11, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 9 10 11
Replies
213
Views
3K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 9, 2026
PonyGTrider
351w turbo build.... Turbo guys teach me things...
  • Kid wita 5oh
  • Oct 22, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
13
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 23, 2025
General karthief
M
Engine Unexplainable Exhaust Pop and Gurgle
  • Mrnissen122
  • Feb 14, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
12
Views
514
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Feb 18, 2026
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?