• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

eibach lowering or frpp lowering springs

  • Thread starter Thread starter icemetalstang
  • Start date Start date May 10, 2009

icemetalstang

New Member
Nov 7, 2007
77
1
0
May 10, 2009
#1
  • May 10, 2009
  • #1
I like the look of Eibach sportline lowering springs but i am concerned with car bottoming out on frame,bump steer, and fender rub.
The FRPP lowering springs only lower back 3/4 inch.
Which is better?
I will be running 17-10.5 rims in rear and 17x9 in front. 245 front - 275 rear

For street applications which is better constant rate or variable rate.
 

Adam95GT

New Member
Aug 14, 2006
2,564
3
0
Burlington, NJ
May 10, 2009
#2
  • May 10, 2009
  • #2
Sport lines... scraped the x brace a bit... no problems with the fenders... i ran camber caster plates


 

ProKiller

Founding Member
Apr 26, 2002
3,064
15
78
PA
May 11, 2009
#3
  • May 11, 2009
  • #3
i'd say the pro-kit more so than the sportlines if you concerned about rubbing and bottoming out. the prokit lowers it 1.5 or so rather than 2+ with the sportlines.
 

icemetalstang

New Member
Nov 7, 2007
77
1
0
May 11, 2009
#4
  • May 11, 2009
  • #4
Will I need camber caster plates with the pro kit and a bump steer kit.
 

earleys94gt

Active Member
Aug 31, 2003
1,223
16
49
Ashley, Ohio
May 11, 2009
#5
  • May 11, 2009
  • #5
With the ProKit, I have heard you do not need caster/camber plates or bump-steer kits.

But, if I were doing an install, I would atleast do the caster/camber plates if money was an issue.

I agree with the ProKit over the Sportlines if you are concerned about bottoming out.

On a side note, progressive rate springs will be better for a smoother, street ride vs. the linear rate springs.
 
I

inphiniti

Active Member
Mar 15, 2003
412
3
28
Providence, RI
May 11, 2009
#6
  • May 11, 2009
  • #6
i have sportlines on my 95 and i must say im doing ok with them. i run 275/35/18s up front and run 315/30/18s outback... the 315s rub every now and then, but the fronts are golden. i will be adding a set of x2 ball joints, 04 cobra a-arms, steeda bumpsteer kit and m/m caster camber plates so i think ill be covered on all bases... as for the rear, im running a set of mega bite jrs and will be running a set of steeda double adjustable uppers...
 

ProKiller

Founding Member
Apr 26, 2002
3,064
15
78
PA
May 12, 2009
#7
  • May 12, 2009
  • #7
i had wearing issues with my pro kit after a year with the stock c/c plates. ended up selling the car before i replaced them but i would still recommend doing the c/c plates. not that expensive for cheapy ones, not to mention used ones.
 

SublimeRT

Member
Jan 25, 2003
230
1
16
Clarksville, TN
May 12, 2009
#8
  • May 12, 2009
  • #8
I bought the FRPP B springs for my car. They're okay. They ride about like stock and didn't lower it so much that I needed caster/camber plates, but on the other hand it's not low enough for me. If I were to do it again I probably would have bought some H&R Super Sports from the get go.
 

Husky44

10 Year Member
Sep 27, 2006
865
104
74
Tacoma, WA
May 12, 2009
#9
  • May 12, 2009
  • #9
I'd be hesitant to do the Sportlines. Sig pic below was an off-brand, but lowered about the same as the sportlines do. I had to replace them because I was dragging getting out of my driveway. I'm running Pro-kits now, and like them, although I still have to be careful going over speed bumps, etc. I can't imagine running anything lower.

Oh, yeah--I did the MM c/c kit, and wouldn't do any drop at all without adding a c/c kit. FWIW, I don't have a bumpsteer kit, and haven't felt like I need one.

Can't help you on the FRPP springs.
 

juiced_94gt

Active Member
Mar 30, 2005
1,143
0
36
Southern California
May 12, 2009
#10
  • May 12, 2009
  • #10
I will sell you my pro-kit, PM me
 

juiced_94gt

Active Member
Mar 30, 2005
1,143
0
36
Southern California
May 12, 2009
#11
  • May 12, 2009
  • #11
and progressive rate for the street
 

icemetalstang

New Member
Nov 7, 2007
77
1
0
May 12, 2009
#12
  • May 12, 2009
  • #12
Thanks these posts have set a direction to move forward in.
 

Husky44

10 Year Member
Sep 27, 2006
865
104
74
Tacoma, WA
May 13, 2009
#13
  • May 13, 2009
  • #13
icemetalstang said:
Thanks these posts have set a direction to move forward in.
Click to expand...

Which is???
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Suspension Harsh Ride
  • PonyGTrider
  • Mar 20, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3 4
Replies
62
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Apr 11, 2026
Noobz347
Fox Alignment Suggestions
  • PonyGTrider
  • Jul 12, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
451
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 13, 2025
PonyGTrider
M
Progress Thread mkk50's Progress Thread
  • mkk50
  • Aug 4, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
19
Views
721
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 22, 2025
Noobz347
SOLD SOLD!!!! 1993 Notchback Roadracer For Sale. She's a beast!
  • Boydster
  • Apr 25, 2025
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
0
Views
1K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Apr 25, 2025
Boydster
Wheels-Tires LS mii swap and rear rim size/axle questions....
  • 78mIIman
  • Feb 2, 2025
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Replies
6
Views
713
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech May 6, 2025
78 Mach1
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?