• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

Eibach vs H&R

  • Thread starter Thread starter Virgil
  • Start date Start date Jul 11, 2004
V

Virgil

New Member
Apr 29, 2004
10
0
0
Jul 11, 2004
#1
  • Jul 11, 2004
  • #1
I am going to order a set of new springs for my 2004 GT, but I'm not sure which set to go with. I heard a lot of people on this forum perfer the Eibach, but the Super Sport H&R lower more than the Eibach Pro-Kit and not as extreme as the Sportline. And what about the Drag-Launch springs by Eibach has anyone used these. Thanks for your comments....
 

TrueBlue03

Member
Dec 9, 2003
372
3
18
Bay Area, CA
Jul 11, 2004
#2
  • Jul 11, 2004
  • #2
In the next week or 2, I'm ordering some sportlines. I like the super sports (how they're in between pro kit and sportline) but the raked look doesnt look too appealing to me. There are 2 GT's around where i live with the H&R SS springs and they look alright, but IMO, the back end doesn't look too good up in the air like that, especially with stock wheels (bullets). I prefer the slammed look a lot more (with the sportlines). There will definately be some bottoming out problems, though.
 

AirWolf87

New Member
Mar 14, 2004
382
0
0
L I, NY
Jul 11, 2004
#3
  • Jul 11, 2004
  • #3
eibachs are a big name but i have heard from a lot of people that the pro-kit tend to sag a bit in the back on mustangs for some reason. Most of the people i know that have them on mustangs use the convertible springs on coupes because the back one are stiffer. i would go with h&r
 
K

Kevin2811

New Member
May 10, 2004
93
0
0
Panama City FL
Jul 11, 2004
#4
  • Jul 11, 2004
  • #4
I had the Eibach drag kit on my 99 GT and the didn't lower the car at all. In fact they all most looked like it sat even higher
 
6

68 & 00 GT

New Member
May 14, 2003
2,407
1
0
HOUSTON TEXAS
Jul 11, 2004
#5
  • Jul 11, 2004
  • #5
Kevin2811 said:
I had the Eibach drag kit on my 99 GT and the didn't lower the car at all. In fact they all most looked like it sat even higher
Click to expand...
lol they're not supposed to lower the car

those springs are only designed specifically for making better weight transfer to the back tires for drag launching

My pro kit hasn't sagged in the rear and have been on for ~3 years. Still sits perfect to me. I may like just a tad bit lower, but it's not worth it. I already have a hard time w/ speed bumps etc.. Not to mention the lower you go the worse you acceleration traction gets (less spring travel). W/ my intercooler, and longtube headers forget ever going lower. My car sits pretty damn good as is anyway -
see here --> http://www.modularmustangs.net/vbgarage.php?do=view&id=469
 

twogts4us

15 Year Member
Apr 1, 2004
4,188
12
79
Dunedin, FL
Jul 11, 2004
#6
  • Jul 11, 2004
  • #6
I'd really recommend swapping struts and shocks while you've got it all apart. A lot of people say you just need springs, but I want to retain ride quality (or enhance it) as well. I am planning to go this route...Tokico Illumina 5 way adjustables for me.
 
3

3.8L_of_Pain

New Member
Jul 4, 2004
123
0
0
Southern California -- Orange County
Jul 11, 2004
#7
  • Jul 11, 2004
  • #7
The local performance shop said a lot of his customers brought their cars back to replace the Eibach drag launch springs with H&R. They said they were unhappy with the cornering and ride on the street. But I am sure this bothers some less than others.

However, as far as weight transfer to the rear goes, they do their thing.

A side note, I am now getting such outstanding launching traction with the Nitto 555R drag radials, I am no longer considering suspension mods.
 

nickthegenius

Active Member
Dec 23, 2002
1,631
1
38
Elwood, IN
Jul 11, 2004
#8
  • Jul 11, 2004
  • #8
I vote H&R Super Sports.


 
K

Kevin2811

New Member
May 10, 2004
93
0
0
Panama City FL
Jul 12, 2004
#9
  • Jul 12, 2004
  • #9
Kind of figured the car wouldn't lower do to the nature of the springs...but dumbass at Summit told me how much I would enjoy the look and perfomance of the drag springs after the 1 1/2 drop.
 

nickthegenius

Active Member
Dec 23, 2002
1,631
1
38
Elwood, IN
Jul 12, 2004
#10
  • Jul 12, 2004
  • #10
Kevin2811 said:
Kind of figured the car wouldn't lower do to the nature of the springs...but dumbass at Summit told me how much I would enjoy the look and perfomance of the drag springs after the 1 1/2 drop.
Click to expand...

The best advice I can give you is that if the part doesn't fit a small-block Chevy, the people at Summit probably don't know WTF they are talking about. It was even worse when I was a Mopar guy. They really don't know crap about Dodges/Plymouths.

But if you call needing an HEI for a 350 or some wheels for that '78 Camaro thats been sitting on blocks in front of your trailer for 5 years, chances are they can probably hook you up with any info you want. Just don't ask them about Fords, Mopars, or AMCs.
 
X

XStanger

Founding Member
Sep 1, 2002
383
0
16
Jul 12, 2004
#11
  • Jul 12, 2004
  • #11
Here is a pic of mine with sportlines, but I left all spring isolators in.

 

Ryan02Stang

Active Member
Jun 17, 2003
1,181
0
36
Arlington Heights, Illinois
Jul 12, 2004
#12
  • Jul 12, 2004
  • #12
Fox body springs!
 

Ghostface

Member
Jan 11, 2004
226
0
17
Jul 12, 2004
#13
  • Jul 12, 2004
  • #13
very clean drop Xstanger. Looks very nice, how's the ride?


Anyone heard of Vogtland springs? They're supposed to have the smoothest ride with a drop somewhere in between the Pro-kits and Supersports. I could only find pics online for a convertible, but would like to see pics for a coupe.
 

rcn4him

New Member
Feb 4, 2003
153
0
0
Milwaukee
Jul 12, 2004
#14
  • Jul 12, 2004
  • #14
I've had sportlines for a year and a half and never bottomed out once!

I got new 5 way Tokico Luminas from the big brown truck but won't have
time for a few days to install
 

Attachments

  • mustang garage.webp
    59.7 KB · Views: 211

GDawg

Founding Member
Mar 22, 2002
1,469
19
68
Nevada
Jul 12, 2004
#15
  • Jul 12, 2004
  • #15
H&R Supersports are the way to go.
 

tygr1

New Member
Jun 16, 2004
318
0
0
SoCal
Jul 12, 2004
#16
  • Jul 12, 2004
  • #16
The Eibachs came nowhere close to dropping the front of my 98 by 1-1/2" as advertised...more like 3/4-1" front and a good 1-1/4" in the rear...maybe that's what people call 'sag'.

I think it looks just fine myself.
 
X

XStanger

Founding Member
Sep 1, 2002
383
0
16
Jul 13, 2004
#17
  • Jul 13, 2004
  • #17
Ghostface said:
very clean drop Xstanger. Looks very nice, how's the ride?


Anyone heard of Vogtland springs? They're supposed to have the smoothest ride with a drop somewhere in between the Pro-kits and Supersports. I could only find pics online for a convertible, but would like to see pics for a coupe.
Click to expand...


Ride is fine. Not to stiff, not bouncy and just about perfect in my opinion.
 

Ryan02Stang

Active Member
Jun 17, 2003
1,181
0
36
Arlington Heights, Illinois
Jul 13, 2004
#18
  • Jul 13, 2004
  • #18
rcn4him said:
I've had sportlines for a year and a half and never bottomed out once!

I got new 5 way Tokico Luminas from the big brown truck but won't have
time for a few days to install
Click to expand...
We have matching cars!!!



BTW...my car has fox body springs...
 

Ruckus46Gt

Member
Nov 26, 2003
385
0
16
Long Island
Jul 13, 2004
#19
  • Jul 13, 2004
  • #19
i dont know about the h&rs having a raked look mine doesnt look that way at all...here is a pic of the ss
 

cap42

New Member
Jul 23, 2003
398
0
0
Bolingbrook IL
Jul 13, 2004
#20
  • Jul 13, 2004
  • #20
Ride looks good now Ryan glad you got them installed I'll have to see it in person in a week or two at the CS show
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Bilstein shocks
  • cnorman31
  • Dec 21, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
516
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Dec 24, 2024
limp
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
1K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
B
Where to go from here on my build…
  • B0udreaux
  • Jul 14, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
238
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 18, 2026
AeroCoupe
Progress Thread "Alter Ego" White 1993 LX 5.0 5spd
  • idareu
  • Sep 9, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
42
Views
3K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 19, 2025
idareu
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?