• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Electric Fan Questions:

  • Thread starter Thread starter BAD67FUN
  • Start date Start date Sep 9, 2004
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
Next
First Prev 3 of 4 Next Last

cardude

Founding Member
Apr 20, 2000
221
0
0
Portland, OR
Sep 10, 2004
#41
  • Sep 10, 2004
  • #41
WORTH said:
If your temp guage is acurate, 200 is not a problem, I run a 195 t-stat, mine is always around 200. with a 13 lb cap you can run about 240-250 without overheating.
Click to expand...

good point, I am running a 160, I remember reading in a long past post that if I go to a higher thermostat (say 190ish) that it may reduce the heating problem???
 
G

gjz30075

Member
Aug 30, 2004
250
0
17
Roswell, Ga
Sep 10, 2004
#42
  • Sep 10, 2004
  • #42
Straight blade is more efficient than curved. Take a look at www.streetortrack.com site and compare the cfm of the curved and straight bladed fans. Curved blades are quieter, however.
 

Mike98GT

New Member
Feb 21, 2004
107
0
0
Temecula, CA
Sep 10, 2004
#43
  • Sep 10, 2004
  • #43
puller fans are best. I highly reccommend an electric fan. and mounting through the radiator is fine, but if you make your own brakets it is VERY IMPORTANT that you mount the fan dirctly on the ratiator so that there is no gap between the radiator and the fan.
 

WORTH

20+ Year Stangneter
Nov 18, 2002
2,166
44
98
Cape Cod, Ma.
Sep 10, 2004
#44
  • Sep 10, 2004
  • #44
Mike98GT said:
puller fans are best. I highly reccommend an electric fan. and mounting through the radiator is fine, but if you make your own brakets it is VERY IMPORTANT that you mount the fan dirctly on the ratiator so that there is no gap between the radiator and the fan.
Click to expand...

I don't know where you get your info, but pushing air is much more effecient than pulling, and as for tieing to the radiator, I've repaired many many radiators that morons tied fans to and the ties cut slots threw the tubes. And if you use a pusher it doesn't have to be touching the rad because it IS more effecient.
 
O

Ozsum2

New Member
Jul 28, 2004
695
1
0
Sep 10, 2004
#45
  • Sep 10, 2004
  • #45
WORTH said:
I don't know where you get your info, but pushing air is much more effecient than pulling, and as for tieing to the radiator, I've repaired many many radiators that morons tied fans to and the ties cut slots threw the tubes. And if you use a pusher it doesn't have to be touching the rad because it IS more effecient.
Click to expand...


You remind me of.......well, ME.
 

WORTH

20+ Year Stangneter
Nov 18, 2002
2,166
44
98
Cape Cod, Ma.
Sep 10, 2004
#46
  • Sep 10, 2004
  • #46
Ozsum2 said:
You remind me of.......well, ME.
Click to expand...

OH Crap, now I'm ascared , Ya know, I just realized sitting here sipping my Morgan n' Coke, I had a very relaxing week No wonder I'm having so much fun here
 

LMan

Founding Member
Aug 10, 2002
1,246
0
0
Mom's basement
Sep 10, 2004
#47
  • Sep 10, 2004
  • #47
theres nothing wrong with 200*. If you couldnt go to 200*, then a pressurized system wouldnt be needed, since you still have 12 degrees to go




Who started the urban legend that 200* was hot?
 
O

Ozsum2

New Member
Jul 28, 2004
695
1
0
Sep 10, 2004
#48
  • Sep 10, 2004
  • #48
LMan said:
theres nothing wrong with 200*. If you couldnt go to 200*, then a pressurized system wouldnt be needed, since you still have 12 degrees to go




Who started the urban legend that 200* was hot?
Click to expand...



Not me. Boiling point drops for every 500' you go up. Try 192* Or is it the other way around?
 

WORTH

20+ Year Stangneter
Nov 18, 2002
2,166
44
98
Cape Cod, Ma.
Sep 10, 2004
#49
  • Sep 10, 2004
  • #49
Ozsum2 said:
Not me. Boiling point drops for every 500' you go up. Try 192* Or is it the other way around?
Click to expand...

the less the pressure the lower the boiling point, at 29 inches of vacuum water will boil at room temp. You are correct. Forgot about you naturally High Guys
 

Mike98GT

New Member
Feb 21, 2004
107
0
0
Temecula, CA
Sep 10, 2004
#50
  • Sep 10, 2004
  • #50
WORTH said:
I don't know where you get your info, but pushing air is much more effecient than pulling, and as for tieing to the radiator, I've repaired many many radiators that morons tied fans to and the ties cut slots threw the tubes. And if you use a pusher it doesn't have to be touching the rad because it IS more effecient.
Click to expand...

Then tell me why almost all new cars have puller fans.
 
O

Ozsum2

New Member
Jul 28, 2004
695
1
0
Sep 10, 2004
#51
  • Sep 10, 2004
  • #51
Mike98GT said:
Then tell me why almost all new cars have puller fans.
Click to expand...


I don't know, but in my case, it is so it won't get packed with freakin snow if it pushed.
 

Hack

15 Year Member
Mar 23, 2004
1,945
13
69
Minneapolis
Sep 11, 2004
#52
  • Sep 11, 2004
  • #52
WORTH said:
I don't know where you get your info, but pushing air is much more effecient than pulling, and as for tieing to the radiator, I've repaired many many radiators that morons tied fans to and the ties cut slots threw the tubes. And if you use a pusher it doesn't have to be touching the rad because it IS more effecient.
Click to expand...
Do you have any links or reference sources explaining why pushing is more efficient than pulling?

It's counter intuitive to me.
 
O

Ozsum2

New Member
Jul 28, 2004
695
1
0
Sep 11, 2004
#53
  • Sep 11, 2004
  • #53
Hack said:
Do you have any links or reference sources explaining why pushing is more efficient than pulling?

It's counter intuitive to me.
Click to expand...


It's just the natural flow of things. The air is going into the radiator and the fan just helps it alone. With it being in front of the radiator, the air hits the radiator at the fastest speed after it leaves the fan, whereas, if it were a puller, the air hits the radiator and is slowed down for a spell until the puller fan pulls it on through.
 

Mike98GT

New Member
Feb 21, 2004
107
0
0
Temecula, CA
Sep 11, 2004
#54
  • Sep 11, 2004
  • #54
Ozsum2 said:
It's just the natural flow of things. The air is going into the radiator and the fan just helps it alone. With it being in front of the radiator, the air hits the radiator at the fastest speed after it leaves the fan, whereas, if it were a puller, the air hits the radiator and is slowed down for a spell until the puller fan pulls it on through.
Click to expand...

I'll try to explain it the best way I can: With a puller there is no resistance such as the fan in the way, also the air speed is constant thoughout the depth on the radiator. With a pusher the air will slow down as it enters the radiator. That's the best I can explain it.
 
O

Ozsum2

New Member
Jul 28, 2004
695
1
0
Sep 11, 2004
#55
  • Sep 11, 2004
  • #55
Mike98GT said:
I'll try to explain it the best way I can: With a puller there is no resistance such as the fan in the way, also the air speed is constant thoughout the depth on the radiator. With a pusher the air will slow down as it enters the radiator. That's the best I can explain it.
Click to expand...


There is still resistance because the radiator slows it down. I want the air hitting the radiator as fast as posible, not the fan on the other side.
 

Hack

15 Year Member
Mar 23, 2004
1,945
13
69
Minneapolis
Sep 11, 2004
#56
  • Sep 11, 2004
  • #56
Ozsum2 said:
There is still resistance because the radiator slows it down. I want the air hitting the radiator as fast as posible, not the fan on the other side.
Click to expand...
I see what you're saying, and I get the logic there. Have you seen any web sites or books, etc that back up what you're saying? I would think that if there's an appreciable difference, companies would explain the difference and try to sell pushers. Theoretically you could run a smaller fan or radiator with the more efficient set up - meaning less $$.
 
O

Ozsum2

New Member
Jul 28, 2004
695
1
0
Sep 11, 2004
#57
  • Sep 11, 2004
  • #57
Hack said:
I see what you're saying, and I get the logic there. Have you seen any web sites or books, etc that back up what you're saying? I would think that if there's an appreciable difference, companies would explain the difference and try to sell pushers. Theoretically you could run a smaller fan or radiator with the more efficient set up - meaning less $$.
Click to expand...


No, I haven't looked. But, the manufacturers probably found out that a puller is adequate, only not as good as a pusher. Then, there is the design problems with it being in front of the radiator and with it being less protected up there. They probably wanted it more protected in the engine bay. Probably a trade off, but if a puller is good enough, what difference does it make.
 

one2gamble

Founding Member
Feb 27, 2001
902
1
0
Monterey
Sep 11, 2004
#58
  • Sep 11, 2004
  • #58
Ozsum2 said:
There is still resistance because the radiator slows it down. I want the air hitting the radiator as fast as posible, not the fan on the other side.
Click to expand...

It seems to me that the air is going to naturally flow into the radiator and that sucking the air through it would just increase that flow. If the air hits the fan it already passed through the radiator. Placing the fan on the other side would do the same but it seems almost as though it could potentially create an area of resistance in front of the radiator even if its spinning. I understand what your saying because the air could be flowing faster on the backside of the fan than on the front side in which case the pusher would have the advantage. I have no idea if this is the case but it would be rather easy to test.
 
G

gp001

Founding Member
Jun 30, 2001
4,401
0
66
So. Cal.
Sep 11, 2004
#59
  • Sep 11, 2004
  • #59
A puller fan is more efficient
 

Hack

15 Year Member
Mar 23, 2004
1,945
13
69
Minneapolis
Sep 11, 2004
#60
  • Sep 11, 2004
  • #60
Ozsum2 said:
No, I haven't looked. But, the manufacturers probably found out that a puller is adequate, only not as good as a pusher. Then, there is the design problems with it being in front of the radiator and with it being less protected up there. They probably wanted it more protected in the engine bay. Probably a trade off, but if a puller is good enough, what difference does it make.
Click to expand...
Good point about protection. On my step daughter's 92 Buick the fan mounting bracket got crushed when she rear ended someone.

The thought about the fan blocking incoming air at higher speeds is a good one. I'm thinking that a pusher is better sitting still, and a puller is better at anything over 15 mph or so.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
Next
First Prev 3 of 4 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

S
Preparation for Holley Terminator X install – Foxbody 306 (electrical fan, alternator, MSD Ignition, etc)
  • So_Flo
  • Mar 1, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
22
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 4, 2026
General karthief
cooling fan questions
  • stackz
  • Jun 5, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
2
Views
908
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jun 6, 2024
stackz
M
Let's talk electric fans.
  • Monkeybutt2000
  • Mar 12, 2023
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
26
Views
7K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 8, 2023
nickyb
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
887
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
For Sale 94 Cobra 408w AOD Project For Sale
  • Labora
  • Oct 11, 2024
  • SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04)
Replies
1
Views
1K
SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04) Apr 7, 2025
Labora
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?