• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

Engine builds

  • Thread starter Thread starter bluestang65
  • Start date Start date Feb 12, 2008

bluestang65

New Member
Jan 11, 2004
22
0
0
Feb 12, 2008
#1
  • Feb 12, 2008
  • #1
Isn't there a thread where you guys talked about your builds, what worked and what didn't? I've been looking for it and for some reason I can't find it. Please point me in that direction if it exists. Thanks.
 

bluestang65

New Member
Jan 11, 2004
22
0
0
Feb 12, 2008
#2
  • Feb 12, 2008
  • #2
I am looking for a good build involving Heads, cam, intake, upgraded ignition and injection components. I don't want to break the bank, but I want something that's reliable and quick enough to get out of its own way. I really enjoyed the Edelbrock combo on my '65 351W.
 

95CobraMike

Active Member
Apr 12, 2004
1,046
0
36
Lima OH
Feb 12, 2008
#3
  • Feb 12, 2008
  • #3
is this engine for your 65 or for a 94-95?
 

bluestang65

New Member
Jan 11, 2004
22
0
0
Feb 12, 2008
#4
  • Feb 12, 2008
  • #4
95CobraMike said:
is this engine for your 65 or for a 94-95?
Click to expand...

This is in the '95 GT Convertible with an AOD.
Thanks,
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Feb 12, 2008
#5
  • Feb 12, 2008
  • #5
bluestang65 said:
This is in the '95 GT Convertible with an AOD.
Thanks,
Click to expand...

At this time you are talking in a very general kind of range

The more specific you get ... the more specific we can answer

How much rwhp are you looking for

Do you wanna be NA or use some kind of PA

If NA you can go ..........

low budget OEM heads/intake & mild cam for 260 to 280 rwhp
or
More pricey after market stuff for 280 to 320 rwhp

You can go blown with KB or Vortech

You can go turbo or use juice

What are your expectations or long term plans

Everybody here is just great at spending your money

Grady
 

bluestang65

New Member
Jan 11, 2004
22
0
0
Feb 12, 2008
#6
  • Feb 12, 2008
  • #6
Gotcha. I thought there already existed a sticky thread where the best builds where spelled out. Although everyone has his own idea of what makes the best build. In the past, I used a prepackaged deal like Edelbrock's RPM setup. It is a little more complicated in my opinion with EFI on a late model car. My target is 375-400 RWHP. I am also very strongly considering a Kenne Bell.
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Feb 13, 2008
#7
  • Feb 13, 2008
  • #7
bluestang65 said:
Gotcha. I thought there already existed a sticky thread where the best builds where spelled out. Although everyone has his own idea of what makes the best build. In the past, I used a prepackaged deal like Edelbrock's RPM setup. It is a little more complicated in my opinion with EFI on a late model car. My target is 375-400 RWHP. I am also very strongly considering a Kenne Bell.
Click to expand...

You will not be able to obtain that goal with an NA OEM short block combo with
an application of street use being considered.

Yes ... you could put something together that would give you those peak
numbers but ... it is gonna be more like a race car application and you would
have no street manners to speak of.

If you wanna keep the focus on NA and obtain that goal ..........

I'd do a 347 with appropriate aftermarket parts and a fairly aggressive cam

A really sharp tune would most likely allow you reasonable street manners

Of course ... This would be nowhere near a ... budget build

The KB would certainly allow you to reach your goal with an OEM sb

IF ... you structure the rest of the combo to support it as needed

Don 95Vert is a fellow who has had success with KB's
so
You might search for his name or go to his site for more details

Grady
 

bluestang65

New Member
Jan 11, 2004
22
0
0
Feb 15, 2008
#8
  • Feb 15, 2008
  • #8
I'll look up some of his threads...I am not looking for a budget build, but which is the best bang for the buck: tuning a 347 built right, or running the KB on the 302 tuned right?
 

ProKiller

Founding Member
Apr 26, 2002
3,064
15
78
PA
Feb 15, 2008
#9
  • Feb 15, 2008
  • #9
both? 347 KB blown would be the easiest way to reach your power level.

if it was me doing it over again, i'd start with a 347 built to handle whatever you want to throw at it. if your not satisfied with the N/A, toss on a KB.
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Feb 15, 2008
#10
  • Feb 15, 2008
  • #10
bluestang65 said:
I'll look up some of his threads...I am not looking for a budget build, but which is the best bang for the buck: tuning a 347 built right, or running the KB on the 302 tuned right?
Click to expand...

A few more general things to consider

The aode will hold down the numbers a bit so if you really wanna hit 400 to the
wheels ... you are gonna have to step it up a bit

You talk about the tune ... and rightfully so ... cause at that level .................
ANY of your choices of build is gonna need a tune

You can expect a chip to be around $500 or if you go self tune I'd say you are
looking at laying out around $1000

I always cringe when advising someone to go blown

NOT ... because it doesn't make good power
or
NOT because I don't like blowers
but
BECAUSE ... I feel a blown combo can be less forgiving than NA

With blowers ... You have to be more thoughtful about grade of gas, heat,
spark, and more of those little things that can get out of hand which then
can pop a hg in a heart beat

Then again .......
a NA combo at that level is not just ... plug and play as well

Just saying the cost and compromise to build and maintain a combo at
that power level needs to be considered and you need to understand
all you can about such a combo.

If your current sb is in good shape ..........
I'd lean toward the KB

Grady
 
P

pacesco

New Member
Jan 21, 2004
24
0
1
Feb 15, 2008
#11
  • Feb 15, 2008
  • #11
I'm going through this right now... I built a 347 from my stock block. i had the mains splayed and the rotating assembly is a scat forged steel. i used RHS cast heads and i still ended up having around $6k in it.

after buying the intake set up along with all the other things that go with it, throw in another $2k.

then the exhaust will be another $1k..

and i did the anderson ford pms unit so throw another $1500 with the wide band meter....

oh yeah don't forget about the juice kit, $700.


so i am almost at $12k just for an engine upgrade....

i'm still doing the final tune but the 100 miles that i have run it so far seems to be some what streetable...

just thought i would let you know what i have done to put some numbers to it..

i am also doing a suspension kit, brakes, and a saleen body kit.. agh!!!!!

it's starting to depress me at the money i am wasting at this thing...
 
I

irish

New Member
Oct 18, 2006
168
0
0
Florida
Feb 15, 2008
#12
  • Feb 15, 2008
  • #12
How about a NA 351W in your vert? Yeah a little more trouble but to make your hp levels, you could keep it NA and fuel injected.

Matt
 
P

pacesco

New Member
Jan 21, 2004
24
0
1
Feb 15, 2008
#13
  • Feb 15, 2008
  • #13
and i forgot about the aode rebuild with converter $2k
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Big Posi and Neg wire from Starter to Battery and Alt wires..........
  • from6to8
  • Feb 9, 2026
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
1
Views
224
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Feb 9, 2026
AeroCoupe
5
Foxbody Intro
  • 5.0Sucio
  • May 26, 2026
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
1
Views
117
The Welcome Wagon May 26, 2026
Noobz347
G
Fox Tire Size for 16" Pony Wheels on 1984 LX Convertible
  • gw7
  • Jun 24, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
119
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 25, 2026
Qtrhrse23
Q
B
Where to go from here on my build…
  • B0udreaux
  • Jul 14, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
216
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 18, 2026
AeroCoupe
S
Fox '87 GT can't get to stay running
  • spilly
  • Mar 29, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
27
Views
842
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
spilly
S
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?