• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Engine need balancing even with stock internals?

  • Thread starter Thread starter 95_5.0_stang
  • Start date Start date Dec 11, 2006
9

95_5.0_stang

New Member
Apr 16, 2005
172
0
0
Lansing, MI.
Dec 11, 2006
#1
  • Dec 11, 2006
  • #1
I'm rebuilding a motor and wondering if I need to have the rotating assembly balanced if I'm using stock internals? The cylinders have been honed and checked by a machine shop. He said there is no need to bore .030. The thing is, the crank will be a brand new (not stroker) 302 crank, pistons/rods will be the old ones cleaned up. Rod/main bearings will be STD. I will have it balanced if it's really needed but if not, then I don't see why I should waste the money. Also, I've searched but can't find an exact answer to this. Thanks.
 

DMAN302

My mom says thanks for the pearl necklace.
Nov 8, 2003
2,120
2
59
windsor, Canada
Dec 11, 2006
#2
  • Dec 11, 2006
  • #2
Since vibration can tear the mill apart I'd say the added expense to balance would be worth it just for peace of mind if nothing else.
 

dastang2

Active Member
Dec 11, 2003
2,020
0
46
tx
Dec 11, 2006
#3
  • Dec 11, 2006
  • #3
no it's not needed unless you wanted to turn higher rpms
 
9

95_5.0_stang

New Member
Apr 16, 2005
172
0
0
Lansing, MI.
Dec 11, 2006
#4
  • Dec 11, 2006
  • #4
Errr...one of you guys going each way. More opinions welcome.... Thanks so far guys!
 

1Bad88notch

New Member
Oct 4, 2005
62
0
0
Leesburg,FL
Dec 11, 2006
#5
  • Dec 11, 2006
  • #5
I would get it balanced to be safe since you are rebuilding it.
 

JChalfan

Member
Nov 27, 2002
551
0
16
Bellevue, WA
Dec 11, 2006
#6
  • Dec 11, 2006
  • #6
Personally I'd balance it. Like DMAN said, it's worth the $$$ for peace of mind if nothing else.

It certainly won't hurt.

Jeff
 
9

95_5.0_stang

New Member
Apr 16, 2005
172
0
0
Lansing, MI.
Dec 11, 2006
#7
  • Dec 11, 2006
  • #7
JChalfan said:
Personally I'd balance it. Like DMAN said, it's worth the $$$ for peace of mind if nothing else.

It certainly won't hurt.

Jeff
Click to expand...

Yea, I understand what ya mean, but I'm not into spending $150-200 just for peace of mind. Lol. Either it needs it or not...which I wouldn't know until it was done. I'm just looking for people who have done a stock rebuild like this to see what they've done.
 

ozanracing

New Member
Nov 28, 2006
172
0
0
Dec 11, 2006
#8
  • Dec 11, 2006
  • #8
As long as the piston and and rods are the same weight, and the crank is the same, you don't need to.
 

FSTRDNU

New Member
Aug 9, 2005
76
0
0
Dec 11, 2006
#9
  • Dec 11, 2006
  • #9
yes, get it done, you actually pick up hp, from balancing
 

JChalfan

Member
Nov 27, 2002
551
0
16
Bellevue, WA
Dec 11, 2006
#10
  • Dec 11, 2006
  • #10
ozanracing said:
As long as the piston and and rods are the same weight, and the crank is the same, you don't need to.
Click to expand...

I think he said it has a new crank, which is one of the reasons I recommended the balancing.

I agree if you're doing a budget rebuild on a stock motor, keeping the stock crank, rods, and pistons (in the correct locations), you could get away without balancing.

It just seems to me it's something you will probably use for years to come. The cost of balancing doesn't seem that bad in the long run...

95_5.0, is the car going to stay stock, or is it going to be modded at all?

Jeff
 

Modular2v

Founding Member
Jun 30, 2002
3,222
23
99
oklahoma
Dec 11, 2006
#11
  • Dec 11, 2006
  • #11
if it is a 50oz 302 crank and the pistons and rods are from a 50oz motor (should have an e7 number on them) Then i would not balance it as it is not needed
 

Rick 91GT

Mustang Master
Nov 29, 1999
9,692
95
99
PA
Dec 12, 2006
#12
  • Dec 12, 2006
  • #12
IT NEEDS TO BE CHECKED AND MY BET RE-BALANCED, due to all the production variances you will need to have the bob weight checked (piston/rod/ring/rod bearing) and the crank spun. You would be surprised how different the bob weights are on some of the stock motors I have pulled apart...
 

2000xp8

SN Certified Technician
Aug 8, 2003
8,016
1,613
194
NJ
Dec 12, 2006
#13
  • Dec 12, 2006
  • #13
95_5.0_stang said:
Yea, I understand what ya mean, but I'm not into spending $150-200 just for peace of mind. Lol. Either it needs it or not...which I wouldn't know until it was done. I'm just looking for people who have done a stock rebuild like this to see what they've done.
Click to expand...

You're not into spending $150-$200 for peace of mind?

It will cost you that much in new gaskets if it's messed up.
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Dec 12, 2006
#14
  • Dec 12, 2006
  • #14
I did a stock rebuild (.030 pistons), used stock crank, stock rods...

$150 well spent...

Get it done, the engine will rev smoother (more hp?) and last longer...

With a new crank and reusing the older parts, the mixing and matching tells me to have it balanced...

Good Luck with it!
 

ninety15.0

New Member
Mar 10, 2004
1,336
0
0
Dec 12, 2006
#15
  • Dec 12, 2006
  • #15
I was in a similar position to yours and i decided the money was well worth it. A couple hundred bucks up front is well worth a smooth revving, more powerful engine, along with the 'peace of mind'. I dont spin my motor past 5500 but i like knowing that 6k wouldnt hurt it if i mess up and over-rev. Lots of good advice from competent stangners who are saying the balancing is in needed and worth it. I would heed their advice.
 

Red88 RICK

Member
Sep 2, 2006
101
0
17
Connecticut
Dec 12, 2006
#16
  • Dec 12, 2006
  • #16
OK i just got a new STOCK crank from ford racing and im using the old connecting rods but new .030 speedpro pistons. the whole motor is pretty much stock just everything new except for the connecting rods i put the whole bottom end togeather then i remembered to have it balanced should i bother taking it apart just to balance? or with all the stock stuff except for the .030 over will it still be all screwy
 

Rick 91GT

Mustang Master
Nov 29, 1999
9,692
95
99
PA
Dec 13, 2006
#17
  • Dec 13, 2006
  • #17
Red88 RICK said:
OK i just got a new STOCK crank from ford racing and im using the old connecting rods but new .030 speedpro pistons. the whole motor is pretty much stock just everything new except for the connecting rods i put the whole bottom end togeather then i remembered to have it balanced should i bother taking it apart just to balance? or with all the stock stuff except for the .030 over will it still be all screwy
Click to expand...

With the addition of the .030" pistons it will need to be balanced, any change it rotational weight will throw it off.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Engine Suggestions on an engine rebuild. Stock cam/GT40Ps or aftermarket on both for a fun weekend driver?
  • MadSquirrelTech
  • Apr 28, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
614
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 7, 2026
MadSquirrelTech
H
1966 mustang starter and pulley troubles
  • Hotrods4ray
  • Sep 24, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
6
Views
344
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jan 10, 2026
Realmongo
P
2002 T5 transmission vibration issue
  • puffoo
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • SN95 V6 Mustang Tech
Replies
0
Views
143
SN95 V6 Mustang Tech Feb 22, 2026
puffoo
P
N
New Edge 3.8L Forged Internals
  • NtheGAME
  • Jun 1, 2025
  • SN95 V6 Mustang Tech
Replies
1
Views
731
SN95 V6 Mustang Tech Jun 3, 2025
Noobz347
H
Forced Induction On3 Turbo Kit- Parts list NEEDED - 302 Stock Motor
  • Hirothecool1
  • Feb 27, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
881
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 7, 2026
slow84lx
S
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?