- Sep 2, 2004
- 54
- 0
- 0
Has anyone else done an I6 to V8 swap in a 66 mustang? I am swapping the 6 cyl 200 with a 302 out of a 71 Torino - Any advice, trials, tribulations, warnings???? 


by the way - aquisition of car, aquisition of 302, 302 clean up and inspection, removal of I6, rhino-lined trunk and undercarriage, cleaned and repainted engine compartment, removal of exhaust, and line up of good, inspected replacement suspension parts were all completed in 6 weeks, and i have LESS THAN $1500.00 invested - it's called horse trading and doing it yourself for all those out there that think restoring or modifying a classic mustang is a time and money consuming process - IT IS ONLY IF YOU LET IT BE!!!!
ScreamingMimi said:I already have a V8 donor car - getting parts isn't an issue - just any tips and tricks or warnings would be appreciated since I am doing the labor myself.by the way - aquisition of car, aquisition of 302, 302 clean up and inspection, removal of I6, rhino-lined trunk and undercarriage, cleaned and repainted engine compartment, removal of exhaust, and line up of good, inspected replacement suspension parts were all completed in 6 weeks, and i have LESS THAN $1500.00 invested - it's called horse trading and doing it yourself for all those out there that think restoring or modifying a classic mustang is a time and money consuming process - IT IS ONLY IF YOU LET IT BE!!!!
, If you have a donor car, everything will be pretty obvious. The rear swap is easy, front end is all bolt on stuff, and the engine swap is a piece of cake. No real words of wisdom, just buya case of beer and have at it 

ScreamingMimi said:I already have a V8 donor car - getting parts isn't an issue - just any tips and tricks or warnings would be appreciated since I am doing the labor myself.by the way - aquisition of car, aquisition of 302, 302 clean up and inspection, removal of I6, rhino-lined trunk and undercarriage, cleaned and repainted engine compartment, removal of exhaust, and line up of good, inspected replacement suspension parts were all completed in 6 weeks, and i have LESS THAN $1500.00 invested - it's called horse trading and doing it yourself for all those out there that think restoring or modifying a classic mustang is a time and money consuming process - IT IS ONLY IF YOU LET IT BE!!!!

WORTH said:The definition of restoring is taking back to original, specifically, the way it rolled off the assembly line, and yes, even with horse trading, it is time consuming and can be expensive. .-1320
__________________
For some yes, not for all, some of us like to build a car the way we want them, not the way Ford wanted them.

Pakrat said:While I agree with that, I do not consider it restoring by definition, it is converting or restomodding, but to restore means to bring back to like new. If you had an antique piece of furniture but think the original cherry finish is undesirable and white paint looks better, try convincing a collector it has merely been restored and see if he'll pay the full price. My guess is no, even if the paint is perfect.
, Oh and I agree with your definition, but I still like it MY WAY 
) but I have also let go of reffering to my car as restored or original in any sense of the word. I do throw around refreshed and refurbished once in a while though.
- second of all - no the donor isn't the 71 torino
the donor is a 66 mustang that had a 289 at one time and is missing most body panels, that thankfully i don't need - I am a member of a Classic car club based out of Michigan and South Carolina. my husband sandblasts car parts and panels for trade, but we are in a network of people who trade parts and services for classic vehicles that they are restoring that stretches from coast to coast. AND the car is going to be show quality - anybody can invest $500 in a classic car and drive a rust bucket - you get what you pay for - but you can still drive a beautiful show ready classic mustang without breaking the bank. i know. this isn't my first restoration, only my first CONVERSION TO A V8. so enough of the vicious and snide remarks - i thought this forum was for possible good advice, not insults -

allcarfan said:Unless you want to pull the axles out of the v8 car and put them in your 6 car.

It does have a C4 but I found out today that the C4 came in 3 different sizes
another reason my hubby thinks I'm nuts. so this weekend will be spent under my stang trying not to drop the tran on my head and polishing my pretty engine while it sits on the engine stand and not in my mustang 
1320stang said:Ain't gonna happen, the I6 rearend is a different animal than the 8" for a V8. It has a removable rear cover like a 7.5 or 8.8 (I think it is a 7.5, but not like a late model 7.5).
). A '64-'65 Falcon should be the same width as its the same underpinnings as the '65-'66 Stang. I think a Mavrick might be a bit narrower, check Mustang Steve's site out. You haven't said where you're located, you might find someone on here that has an extra 8". I have gotten a '57 Ranchero 9" for my '65 coupe, but I'm saving the 8" for a future front engine dragster project (flathead powered) I have another 8" housing in my '63 Fairlane drag car project and I think a set of axles for it. (I have a big web 9" out of an F-150 for that project)