• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Engine woes

  • Thread starter Thread starter 69gmachine
  • Start date Start date Oct 15, 2006

69gmachine

Member
Dec 2, 2004
576
2
19
Southern Maryland
Oct 15, 2006
#1
  • Oct 15, 2006
  • #1
I've built several SBFs in my life, but this is not one of them. Everything I had built before was a mild performance hop up with a stock bottom end. This was a high dolllar, high performance engine I didn't trust myself to do. My mistake. I only made two runs on a road course and bent 6 of the intake pushrods when making a pass and revving the engine well over my intended 6k limit. Now here is the kicker: there is absolutley no evidence of any valve hitting any piston! I used a custom grind reduced base circle Comp cam, OEM used hyd roller lifters, the stock springs on the AFR 205 heads, 1.6 Comp magnum roller rockers, and what was supposed to be hardend pushrods. They are stock small Chevy lengths. They are cheap 5/16s tubes with pressed in balls. Most of the balls came out of the ones that bent. Since there is no evidence of physical contact, my question is this; is it possible that the pushrods were simply not strong enough to handle the revs? Has anyone else ever had this happen to them? My engine revved like crazy for a big 4" stroke, due to the aluminum flywheel.
 
M

MitchGT

Member
Apr 1, 2005
204
0
17
Oct 16, 2006
#2
  • Oct 16, 2006
  • #2
I know the oem lifters don't like to rev all that high. They might have compressed with all that rpm, leaving too much lash so that the pressed in ends got pounded out. It's interesting that it only happened on the intakes. It could be that the intake valves are heavier and pounded the valvetrain harder, or that the valves have more diameter and did end up tapping the pistons a little.
 

rbohm

Founding Member
Apr 12, 2002
6,698
550
204
tucson,az
Oct 16, 2006
#3
  • Oct 16, 2006
  • #3
two things to check, coil bind and rocker arm to stud interference. you may have too much lift causing the springs to bind fully. it is interesting that only the intakes suffered bent pushrods though. perhaps the installed height of the springs on those valves was enough to allow coil bind. remember that the stock springs dont like valve lifts much over .460".

also even though the cam companies make the rocker arm slots longer to allow for more clearance between the rocker arm and the stud, it is possible that the rockers on those valve may have slots that were not properly machined.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

F
Ford 460 swap
  • Ford460
  • Sep 13, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
6
Views
427
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Sep 14, 2026
Ford460
F
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
1K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Oct 19, 2026
mattcrp1
M
9
Forced Induction Prepping for supercharger on non-stock build
  • 91fox427
  • Nov 25, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
550
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jan 5, 2026
Qtrhrse23
J
Help Figuring Motor Choice(Possible future turbo)?
  • jaygee15
  • Dec 14, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
13
Views
886
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 3, 2026
Jarhead67
J
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?